亡之道,用之以卜筮,毫发无差。虽然,全贤谆谆教诲,必使尽人事以副天意,则凶者化吉,亡者得存,未尝令人委之
于天命也。传曰∶修身以俟命而已矣。是故医者可以通神明而权造化,能使夭者寿而寿者仙,医道其可废乎。
或问∶先哲谓诸痛为实,诸痒为虚。丹溪亦曰∶诸痛不可用参 ,盖补其气,气旺不通而痛愈甚。然则凡病痛者,
例不可用参 等药乎?曰;以上所论诸痛,特指其气实者为言耳,如暴伤风寒,在表作痛,或因七情九气怫郁不得宣通
而作痛者,固不可用补气药也。若夫劳役伤形,致身体解 而作痛者,或大便后及大泻痢后气血虚弱,身体疼痛及四肢
麻痹而痛,或妇人产后气血俱虚,致身体百节疼痛等病,其可不用参 等补气药乎,学人毋执一也。
或问∶寸、关、尺三脉部位,既得闻命矣。外有人迎、气口、神门三脉,其位安在?请明以告我。曰∶按《活人书》
谓左手关前一分,人迎是也。右手关前一分,气口是也。又按经脉谓左手人迎以前寸口脉,即知人迎在病患左手关前寸
后之位,诊者右手食指与中指两岐之间是也。又谓右手气口以前寸口脉,即知气口在病患右手关前寸后之位,诊者左手
食指与中指两岐之间是也。经又曰∶两手神门以后尺中脉,即知神门各在病患两手关后寸前之位,诊者中指与无名指两
岐之间是也。今人多不识此,或指人迎于左关,或指人迎于左寸,或指气口于右关,或指气口于右寸,或指神门于两
关相对者,皆非也,学人可不审乎。
或问∶药性有相畏相恶相反,而古方多有同为一剂而用者,其理何如?曰∶若夫彼畏我者,我必恶之,我所恶者,
彼必畏我,盖我能制其毒而不得以自纵也。且如一剂之中,彼虽畏我,而主治之能在彼,故其分两,当彼重我轻,略将
以杀其毒耳;设我重彼轻,制之太过,则尽夺其权而治病之功劣矣。然药性各有能毒,其所畏者畏其能,所恶者恶其毒
耳。如仲景制小柴胡汤,用半夏、黄芩、生姜三物同剂,其半夏、黄芩畏生姜,而生姜恶黄芩、半夏,因其分两适中,
故但制其 悍之毒,而不减其退寒热之能也。其为性相反者,各怀酷毒,如两军相敌,决不与之同队也。虽然,外有大
毒之疾,必用大毒之药以攻之,又不可以常理论也。如古方感应丸用巴豆、牵牛同剂,以为攻坚积药。四物汤加人参、
五灵脂辈,以治血块。丹溪治尸瘵二十四味莲心散,以甘草芫花同剂,而谓妙处在此。是盖贤者真知灼见方可用之,昧
者固不可妄试以杀人也。夫用药如用兵,善用者置之死地而后存,若韩信行背水阵也,不善者徒取灭亡之祸耳,可不慎
哉!
或问∶当归一物,雷公谓头破血,身和血,尾止血。东垣又云头止血,身养血,尾破血。二说不同,岂无归一之论
乎?请明以告我。曰∶东垣曰∶当归者,使气血各有所归之功之号也。盖其能逐瘀血,生新血,使血脉通畅,与气并行,
周流不息,故云然。又曰∶中半以上,气脉上行,天气主之,中半以下,气脉下行,地气主之,身则独守乎中而不行也,
故人身之法象亦犹是焉。予谓瘀血在上焦与上焦之血少,则用去芦上截;瘀血在下焦与下焦之血虚,则用下截之尾;若
欲行中焦之瘀与补中焦之血,则用中一段之身。非独当归,他如黄芩,用上截之虚者以降肺火,用下截之实者以泻大肠
之火,防风、桔梗之类亦然,此千古不易之定论也,学人详之。
或问∶黄柏、地黄之类,俱忌铁器蒸捣,何欤?曰∶夫地黄、黄柏之类,皆肾经药也。钱仲阳谓肾有补而无泻。又
曰虚者补其母,实者泻其子。盖肾乃阴中之少阴,为涵养真元之水脏,其所以忌铁器者,防其伐木泻肝,恐子能令母虚
也。竟无他说。
或问∶本草所载竹茹、竹叶及烹竹沥,皆云用淡竹。夫竹类颇多,未审何竹名为淡竹耶?曰∶东坡苏公之方有云∶
淡竹者,对苦竹为文,除苦竹之外,皆淡竹也。我丹溪先生常用早 ,俗名雷竹,此淡中之淡者也。此竹又名甜竹,以
其笋之味甜也。别有一种水竹,其笋味纯淡。故以上二竹皆可入药用,缘二笋俱无 辣之味,故知其无毒故也。如无二
竹,晚 竹亦可代用,余竹皆不可用也。
或问∶岭表烟瘴之地,其俗平居无病之人,朝夕常噬槟榔,云可辟除山岚瘴气之疾。吾儒有仕于彼地者,亦随其俗
而噬之,果有益乎?否乎?曰∶按本草槟榔味辛气温,为纯阳之物,善驱逐滞气,散邪气,泄胸中至高之气,除痰癖下
行,以治后重脱 之证。如果有以上诸疾,用之以佐木香、芩、术等药,无不应验。若无病冲和之胃气,而无故朝夕常
噬,吾恐反泄真气,非徒无益而又害之是也。呜呼!因习之弊,死而无悔者焉。罗谦甫曰∶无病服药,如壁里添柱。诚
哉是言也。尝闻用药如用兵,朝廷不得已而行之,以御寇耳;若无寇可平而无故发兵,不惟空废粮饷,抑且害及于无辜
之
良民也,戒之戒之!
或问∶妇人产后诸疾,古方多用四物汤加减调治。我丹溪先生独谓芍药酸寒,能伐发生之气,禁而不用,何欤?曰∶
新产之妇,血气俱虚之甚,如天地不交之否,有降无升,但存秋冬肃杀之令,而春夏生发之气未复,故产后诸证,多不
利乎寒凉之药,大宜温热之剂,以助其资始资生之化源也。盖先哲制四物汤方,以川芎、当归之温,佐以芍药地黄之寒,
是以寒温适中,为妇人诸疾之妙剂也。若或用于产后,必取白芍药以酒重复制炒,去其酸寒之毒,但存生血活血之能,
胡为其不可也。后人传写既久,脱去制炒注文,丹溪虑夫俗医卤莽,不制而用之,特举其为害之由以戒之耳。若能根据法
制炒为用,何害之有哉,学人其可不知此乎。
致败亡之道,若用于占卜预测,也能做到毫发不差。虽然如此,先贤谆谆教诲,必定要求人们尽力做好人事以顺应天意,这样凶险可以转化为吉祥,濒临死亡的人得以存活,从未让人完全听凭天命摆布。古书说:“修养自身以等待天命罢了。”因此,医生可以通达神明而掌握造化,能使夭折者长寿,使长寿者成仙,医道怎么可以废弃呢?
有人问:先哲曾说各种疼痛属于实证,各种瘙痒属于虚证。朱丹溪也说:各种疼痛不可用人参,因为补益了气,气旺盛但运行不通畅,疼痛反而更加严重。那么,凡是患有疼痛病症的人,一律都不能用人参等药物吗?回答说:以上所论述的各种疼痛,特指那些气机实盛的病症而言。例如突然受风寒侵袭,邪气在体表引起疼痛,或者因为七情、九气郁结不得宣通而引起疼痛的,固然不能使用补气药。至于因过度劳累损伤形体,导致身体懈怠酸痛;或者在大便后及严重腹泻痢疾后,气血虚弱,出现身体疼痛及四肢麻木疼痛;或者妇女产后气血俱虚,导致全身关节疼痛等病症,这些难道可以不使用人参等补气药吗?学习者不要拘泥固执于一种观点。
有人问:寸、关、尺三部脉的部位,我已经听明白了。另外有人迎、气口、神门三处脉位,它们的位置在哪里?请明确告诉我。回答说:按照《活人书》的说法,左手关前一分处,是人迎脉。右手关前一分处,是气口脉。又按照经脉理论,左手人迎之前的寸口脉,由此可知人迎位于患者左手关前、寸后的位置,即诊者右手食指与中指两歧之间的位置。又说右手气口之前的寸口脉,由此可知气口位于患者右手关前、寸后的位置,即诊者左手食指与中指两歧之间的位置。经书又说:两手神门以后的尺中脉,由此可知神门各位于患者两手关后、寸前的位置,即诊者中指与无名指两歧之间的位置。现在很多人不认识这些部位,有的将人迎指在左关,有的将人迎指在左寸,有的将气口指在右关,有的将气口指在右寸,有的将神门指在两关相对的位置,这些都是错误的,学习者能不仔细审察吗?
有人问:药物的性质有相畏、相恶、相反,而古方中多有将这类药物同用在一剂中的情况,其中的道理是什么?回答说:如果彼药畏我药,我药必恶之;我药所恶的,彼药必畏我药。大概是因为我能制约它的毒性,而不能让它放纵无忌。况且在一剂药中,虽然彼药畏我药,但主治的功效在于彼药,所以它们的分量,应当让彼药重而我药轻,略微用来消除它的毒性罢了;如果我药重而彼药轻,制约太过,就会完全剥夺它的主治权能,导致治疗疾病的功效变差。然而药物性质各有其能毒,它所畏惧的是对方的“能”(功效),所厌恶的是对方的“毒”(毒性)。例如张仲景制作小柴胡汤,使用半夏、黄芩、生姜三味药同用,其中半夏、黄芩畏生姜,而生姜恶黄芩、半夏,因为它们的分量适中,所以只是制约了它们辛悍的毒性,而不减少它们退寒热的功效。至于那些性质相反的药物,各自怀有剧烈的毒性,如同两军对敌,决不会让它们同队共处。虽然如此,对于外有大毒的疾病,必须用大毒的药物来攻伐,这又不可以用常理来衡量了。例如古方感应丸使用巴豆、牵牛子同用,作为攻坚积滞的药物。四物汤加入人参、五灵脂等,用来治疗血块。朱丹溪治疗尸瘵(肺结核)的二十四味莲心散,使用甘草与芫花同用,并认为妙处就在这里。这大概是贤者真知灼见才可以使用的,愚昧之人绝不可妄加尝试以免杀人。用药如同用兵,善于用药的人将其置于死地而后求生路,就像韩信行背水阵一样;不善于用药的人只会招致灭亡的祸患,能不谨慎吗!
有人问:关于当归这一味药,雷公说头破血,身和血,尾止血。李东垣又说头止血,身养血,尾破血。两种说法不同,难道没有统一的结论吗?请明确告诉我。回答说:李东垣说:当归,具有使气血各有所归的功效,所以得名。因为它能祛除瘀血,生成新血,使血脉通畅,与气并行,周流不息,所以说它是这样的。他又说:药材的中半以上,气脉上行,由天气主导;中半以下,气脉下行,由地气主导;中间部分则独守其中而不偏行。所以人身的法象也是如此。我认为:瘀血在上焦以及上焦血少时,使用去芦的上截;瘀血在下焦以及下焦血虚时,使用下截的尾部;如果想要行中焦之瘀或补中焦之血,则使用中间的一段茎身。不仅仅是当归,其他如黄芩,用上截的虚者以降肺火,用下截的实者以泻大肠之火,防风、桔梗等也是这样,这是千古不变的定论,学习者要详细研究。
有人问:本草所载的竹茹、竹叶及烹制的竹沥,都说要用淡竹。竹子种类很多,不知什么竹子叫淡竹?回答说:东坡苏公的方书中说:淡竹是相对于苦竹而言的,除了苦竹之外,都是淡竹。我的丹溪先生常用早生的竹,俗名雷竹,这是淡中之淡的竹子。这种竹子又名甜竹,因为它的笋味道甜美。另外有一种水竹,它的笋味道纯淡。所以以上两种竹子都可以入药,因为这两种笋都没有辛辣的味道,所以知道它们无毒。如果没有这两种竹子,晚生的竹也可以代用,其余的竹子都不可用。
有人问:岭南烟瘴之地,那里的习俗是平时没有病的人,早晚常常咀嚼槟榔,说可以辟除山岚瘴气引起的疾病。我们儒家中有在那里做官的人,也随顺当地习俗咀嚼它,果然有益吗?还是有害?回答说:按本草记载,槟榔味辛性温,属于纯阳之物,善于驱逐滞气,散发邪气,泄降胸中至高之气,使痰癖下行,用来治疗里急后重、脱肛等证候。如果有以上各种疾病,用它配合木香、黄芩、白术等药物,没有不应验的。如果没有病而冲和的胃气正常,却无故早晚常嚼槟榔,我恐怕反而会泄露真气,不仅无益反而有害。唉!因循习以为弊,至死都不后悔的情况太多了。罗谦甫说:无病服药,就像墙壁里添柱子。这话真是正确啊。曾经听说用药如同用兵,朝廷不得已才使用它,用来抵御敌人;如果没有敌人可平定却无故发兵,不仅白白浪费粮饷,而且会伤害无辜的良民,一定要警惕啊!
有人问:妇人产后的各种疾病,古方多用四物汤加减调治。我的丹溪先生唯独认为芍药酸寒,能伐伤发生之气,禁止使用而不采用,为什么呢?回答说:刚生产完的妇女,气血极度虚弱,就像天地不交的否卦,只有下降没有上升,只存有秋冬肃杀的景象,而春夏生发的气机尚未恢复,所以产后各种证候,大多不利于寒凉药物,非常适宜温热药剂,以资助其始生和化生的源头。先哲制定四物汤方,以川芎、当归的温性,佐以芍药、地黄的寒性,因此寒温适中,成为治疗妇人各种疾病的妙剂。如果用于产后,必定取白芍药用酒反复蒸制炒熟,去除其酸寒的毒性,只保留生血活血的功效,有什么不可以的呢?后人传写时间久了,脱去了蒸制炒熟的注文,丹溪担心世俗医生鲁莽,不经过炮制就使用,特意列举其危害的原因来告诫他们罢了。如果能根据法制成炮制品使用,有什么害处呢?学习者怎么能不知道这一点呢?
The path to ruin, if applied to divination and fortune-telling, can be executed with not a hair's breadth of error. Nevertheless, the sages earnestly teach that one must exhaust human effort to align with Heaven's will, so that misfortune transforms into auspiciousness, and the dying are preserved; they never advocate leaving everything to fate. The classics say: "Cultivate oneself and await destiny." Therefore, physicians can communicate with the divine and manipulate creation, enabling those destined for premature death to live long, and the long-lived to attain immortality. How could the Way of Medicine be abolished?
A question was raised: Ancient philosophers stated that all pain belongs to Excess (Shi), while all itching belongs to Deficiency (Xu). Zhu Danxi also said: "All pain should not be treated with Ginseng," because tonifying Qi causes it to become vigorous but stagnant, thereby worsening the pain. Then, is it true that for all painful conditions, Ginseng and similar herbs must generally be avoided? The answer is: The aforementioned discussion on various pains specifically refers to cases where Qi is Excess. For instance, sudden invasion of Wind-Cold causing pain in the exterior, or pain arising from the stagnation of the Seven Emotions and Nine Qi which fails to circulate freely, certainly cannot be treated with Qi-tonifying herbs. However, regarding conditions such as body ache due to overexertion damaging the form, or body pain following defecation or severe dysentery due to Qi and Blood deficiency, or limb numbness and pain, or postpartum general joint pain due to dual deficiency of Qi and Blood in women—can these possibly be treated without Ginseng and other Qi-tonifying herbs? Students must not adhere rigidly to a single viewpoint.
Another question: I have heard of the positions of the Cun, Guan, and Chi pulse locations. Additionally, there are three pulse sites: Renying, Qikou, and Shenmen. Where are their positions? Please inform me clearly. The answer is: According to the *Huoren Shu* (Book of Living People), the Renying pulse is located at the one-fen position anterior to the Guan on the left wrist. The Qikou pulse is located at the one-fen position anterior to the Guan on the right wrist. Furthermore, according to the Meridian theory, the Cun Kou pulse anterior to the Renying on the left hand indicates that Renying is situated between the Guan and Cun on the patient's left wrist, corresponding to the bifurcation between the index and middle fingers of the examiner's right hand. Similarly, the Cun Kou pulse anterior to the Qikou on the right hand indicates that Qikou is situated between the Guan and Cun on the patient's right wrist, corresponding to the bifurcation between the index and middle fingers of the examiner's left hand. The classics further state: The Chi pulse posterior to the Shenmen on both hands indicates that Shenmen is located between the Guan and Cun on both wrists of the patient, corresponding to the bifurcation between the middle and ring fingers of the examiner. Nowadays, many people do not recognize these positions. Some locate Renying at the Left Guan, others at the Left Cun; some locate Qikou at the Right Guan, others at the Right Cun; some locate Shenmen opposite the two Guans. All these are incorrect. Can students fail to examine this carefully?
Another question: Drug properties include Mutual Fear (Xiangwei), Mutual Aversion (Xiang'e), and Mutual Opposition (Xiangfan). Yet ancient prescriptions often combine such drugs in a single formula. What is the rationale? The answer is: If Drug B fears Drug A, then Drug A avers Drug B; what Drug A avers, Drug B fears. This is because Drug A can control the toxicity of Drug B, preventing it from acting recklessly. Moreover, within a single prescription, although Drug B may fear Drug A, its therapeutic efficacy is primary. Therefore, the dosage should be heavier for Drug B and lighter for Drug A, merely to mitigate its toxicity. If Drug A were heavier and Drug B lighter, the control would be excessive, completely stripping Drug B of its authority and diminishing its therapeutic effect. However, each drug has its own potency and toxicity. The "fear" relates to controlling the opponent's potency, while "aversion" relates to countering its toxicity. For example, Zhang Zhongjing's Xiao Chai Hu Tang (Minor Bupleurum Decoction) combines Banxia (Pinelliae Rhizoma), Huangqin (Scutellariae Radix), and Shengjiang (Zingiberis Rhizoma Recens). Banxia and Huangqin fear Shengjiang, while Shengjiang avers Huangqin and Banxia. Because the dosages are balanced, Shengjiang only restrains the harsh toxicity of the others without reducing their ability to resolve alternating chills and fever. As for drugs with Mutual Opposition, each harbors severe toxicity, like two armies facing each other; they absolutely do not share the same formation. Nevertheless, for external diseases caused by great toxins, great toxic drugs must be used to attack them; this cannot be judged by ordinary rules. For instance, the ancient Ganying Wan uses Badou (Crotonis Fructus) and Qianniuzi (Pharbitidis Semen) together to break down accumulations. Si Wu Tang (Four Substance Decoction) combined with Renshen (Ginseng Radix et Rhizoma) and Wulingzhi (Trogopterori Faeces) treats blood masses. Zhu Danxi's Ershisi Wei Lianxin San for Corpse Consumption (Lao/Consumption disease) combines Gancao (Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma) and Yuanhua (Genkwa Flos), claiming the brilliance lies here. Only sages with true insight can use such combinations; fools must not rashly try them, lest they kill. Using medicine is like using troops: the skilled place themselves in desperate situations to survive, like Han Xin's Back-to-the-River formation; the unskilled invite only destruction. Must one not be cautious!
Another question: Regarding Danggui (Angelicae Sinensis Radix), Lei Gong stated that the head breaks blood, the body harmonizes blood, and the tail stops bleeding. Li Dongyuan stated that the head stops bleeding, the body nourishes blood, and the tail breaks blood. These two theories differ. Is there no unified conclusion? Please clarify. The answer is: Li Dongyuan said: "Danggui" signifies the merit of making Qi and Blood return to their proper places. It can expel stasis and generate new blood, ensuring smooth meridians, allowing Qi and Blood to move together continuously. He further explained: The upper half of the root corresponds to ascending Qi governed by Heaven; the lower half corresponds to descending Qi governed by Earth; the middle part remains central. Thus, the analogy to the human body holds. I propose: For stasis in the Upper Jiao or deficiency of blood in the Upper Jiao, use the upper section (head); for stasis in the Lower Jiao or deficiency of blood in the Lower Jiao, use the lower section (tail); for stasis or deficiency in the Middle Jiao, use the middle section (body). This applies to other herbs as well: for Huangqin (Scutellariae Radix), use the upper section for empty heat to descend Lung fire, and the lower section for excess heat to drain Large Intestine fire. Fangfeng (Saposhnikoviae Radix) and Jiegeng (Platycodonis Radix) follow similar principles. This is an unchangeable principle since antiquity; students should study it carefully.
Another question: The Materia Medica states that Zhuru (Bambusa Textilis Caulis), Zhuye (Bambusa Leaf), and Zhuli (Bambusa Sap) must avoid iron vessels during steaming and pounding. Why? The answer is: Dihuang (Rehmanniae Radix Praeparata) and Huangbai (Phellodendri Cortex) are Kidney channel herbs. Qian Zhongyang stated: "The Kidney has tonification but no purgation." He also said: "Tonify the Mother for Deficiency, Purge the Child for Excess." The Kidney is the Shaoyin of Yin, the water organ that nurtures True Yuan. The reason for avoiding iron is to prevent the depletion of Wood (Liver) via Metal (Iron), fearing that the Child (Water/Kidney) being drained might cause the Mother (Wood/Liver) to become deficient. There is no other explanation.
Another question: The Materia Medica specifies using Danshu (Light Bamboo) for Zhuru, Zhuye, and Zhuli. There are many bamboo species. Which one is called Danshu? The answer is: Su Dongpo's formulas state: "Danshu" is defined in contrast to Kushu (Bitter Bamboo); except for Kushu, all others are Danshu. My master, Mr. Danxi, often used early-shoot bamboo, commonly known as Leizhu (Thunder Bamboo), which is the lightest of the light. This bamboo is also called Tiantu (Sweet Bamboo) because its shoots are sweet. Another variety, Shuishu (Water Bamboo), has shoots with a pure mild taste. Therefore, these two bamboos can be used medicinally because their shoots lack pungent/spicy flavors, indicating non-toxicity. If these two are unavailable, Wanzhu (Late Bamboo) can substitute; other bamboos are unusable.
Another question: In the miasma-prone regions of Lingnan, locals who are otherwise healthy chew Binglang (Arecae Semen) morning and night, claiming it wards off mountain miasma diseases. Confucian scholars serving there adopt this custom. Is it beneficial or harmful? The answer is: According to the Materia Medica, Binglang is Pungent and Warm, a Pure Yang substance. It effectively disperses stagnant Qi, scatters pathogenic Qi, descends excessive Qi in the chest, moves phlegm downwards, and treats tenesmus and rectal prolapse. If such symptoms exist, combining it with Muxiang (Aucklandiae Radix), Huangqin, and Baizhu yields effective results. However, if one has a harmonious Stomach Qi and is healthy, chewing it daily out of habit likely leaks True Qi, doing more harm than good. Alas! The弊端 (drawback) of habit leads to regret even unto death. Luo Qianfu said: "Taking medicine when healthy is like adding pillars inside a wall." This is truly correct. I have heard that using medicine is like deploying troops; the court does so reluctantly to repel invaders. If there are no invaders yet troops are sent, grain is wasted, and innocent civilians are harmed. Beware! Beware!
Another question: Ancient formulas for postpartum disorders often use Si Wu Tang (Four Substance Decoction) with modifications. However, my master Danxi exclusively prohibited Shaoyao (Paeoniae Radix Alba) because its Sour and Cold nature damages the generating Qi. Why? The answer is: Women after childbirth suffer extreme Qi and Blood deficiency, akin to the hexagram Pi (Standstill), where descent occurs without ascent. Only the austere energy of Autumn/Winter exists, while the generating energy of Spring/Summer has not returned. Therefore, postpartum conditions generally contraindicate Cold/Cooling herbs and strongly favor Warm/Hot agents to support the source of generation. The ancients formulated Si Wu Tang using the Warmth of Chuanxiong (Chuanxiong Rhizoma) and Danggui to balance the Coldness of Shaoyao and Dihuang, making it an excellent formula for gynecological disorders. If used postpartum, one must take Baishaoyao (White Peony Root), repeatedly stir-fry it with wine to remove its Sour/Cold toxicity, retaining only its blood-generating and blood-invigorating properties. Why would this be unacceptable? Later copies omitted the processing instructions. Danxi feared ignorant doctors would use it raw and thus warned of the dangers. If processed correctly according to method, what harm is there? Should students not know this?