温热之屡变而乱其真也，由于伤寒之一变而失其传。风寒诸病由太阳入阳明者，有《伤寒论》在，尚且各自为说。
至温热而漫以为仲景所未言，更不妨别出己见，每先将温病移入他经，或且移作他证，如弈棋然，直无一局之同者。若
喻嘉言移其病于少阴肾；周禹载移其病于少阳胆；舒驰远移其病于太阴脾；顾景文移其病于太阴肺；遂移其病于厥阴心
包；秦皇士移其病于南方；吴鞠通移其病于上焦；陈素中、杨栗山移其病为杂气；章虚谷、王孟英移其病为外感；尤其
甚者，则张介宾、张石顽以及戴天章辈，皆移其病为瘟疫；而石顽又移其病为夹阴。娓娓动听，亦若各有一理也者，而
不知阳明为成温之薮，古来皆无异说，皆以《伤寒论》阳明方为治。自夫人欲废阳明方，故必先将阳明病移出阳明外。
非余之故为訾议也，苟其不然，则东扯西拽者，何以必将千古相传之定法，弁髦弃之哉？禹谟曰∶宥过无大，刑故无小。
不知而移之，出于无心也，过也，犹可恕也；知而移之，出于有心也，故也，不可言也。潜窥其隐，恐尚不仅为明昧之
分，后有作者，或更别有移法，总欲令世人不知有仲景，而乐就其简便之门、新奇之说耳。然此皆将温病移出阳明者，
更有明知其在阳明，亦必谓不可用《伤寒》方，而自制一二味药，以为此非仲景所知，其实除此一二味，则仍不离《伤
寒论》之葛根、膏、黄。试一问黄坤载、杨栗山辈，于青萍、蚕、蝉外，所用何药，即可见矣。此则暗袭《伤寒》方，
而即明斥《伤寒论》，又以不移为移者也。吾愿任斯道之君子，毋为移字诀所误，看得仲景书只宜于寒，而疑《伤寒》
之方，真不可用于温热之病，则吾道之幸，亦病家之幸也。
温热病之所以频繁变化而扰乱了其本真，是因为伤寒病经过一次传变就失去了其正确的传承。风寒类疾病由太阳经传入阳明经的情况，在《伤寒论》中已有记载，尚且各自有独立的论述。
至于温热病，人们却随意认为这是张仲景未曾提及的内容，更不妨碍提出自己的见解。他们往往先将温病转移到其他经络，或者将其改换为其他证型，就像下棋一样，简直没有两局是完全相同的。例如：喻嘉言将温病归入少阴肾经；周禹载将温病归入少阳胆经；舒驰远将温病归入太阴脾经；顾景文将温病归入太阴肺经；（有人）将其归入厥阴心包经；秦皇士将温病归入南方地域；吴鞠通将温病归入上焦；陈素中、杨栗山将温病归为杂气致病；章虚谷、王孟英将温病归为外感病；更为严重的是，张介宾、张石顽以及戴天章等人，都将温病归为瘟疫；而张石顽又将温病归为夹阴证。这些说法娓娓动听，似乎各有各的道理，然而却不知道阳明经是形成温热病的根源，自古以来都没有不同的说法，都主张使用《伤寒论》中的阳明方剂进行治疗。正是因为这些人想要废除阳明方剂的使用，所以必然先将阳明病从阳明经的概念中剥离出去。这并不是我故意诋毁议论，如果不是这样，那些东拉西扯的人，为什么要抛弃千古相传的定法呢？禹谟曾说：“宽恕无意的过失，即使很大也可以原谅；惩罚故意的罪行，即使很小也不可赦免。”不知道而错误地转移病位，是出于无心，属于过失，还可以宽恕；知道而故意转移病位，是出于有心，属于故意，不可饶恕。暗中窥探他们的隐衷，恐怕不仅仅是因为明暗之分，后来的作者，或许还有其他的移花接木之法，总之是想让世人不知道张仲景的存在，而乐于追随他们简便的门径和新奇的学说罢了。然而这些都是将温病移出阳明经的做法，更有明知病在阳明经，也必定声称不能用《伤寒论》的方剂，而自己制作一两味药的方子，认为这不是张仲景所知道的，其实除了这一两味药之外，仍然离不开《伤寒论》中的葛根、石膏、黄芩等药物。试问黄坤载、杨栗山等人，除了青萍、蚕、蝉之外，还使用了什么药物，就可以看出来了。这则是暗中抄袭《伤寒论》的方剂，却公开斥责《伤寒论》，这是一种以“不移”为“移”的做法。我希望担当中医大道的君子们，不要被这种“移字诀”所误导，不要认为张仲景的书只适用于寒证，从而怀疑《伤寒论》的方剂真的不能用于温热病，那么这就是我们医道的幸事，也是患者的幸事啊。
The frequent changes of warm-heat diseases (Wenbing, 温病) and the resulting confusion of their true nature stem from the deviation in the transmission of cold-injury diseases (Shanghan, 伤寒). For wind-cold diseases that enter the Yangming channel (Yangming Jing, 阳明经) from the Taiyang channel (Taiyang Jing, 太阳经), there is the *Treatise on Cold Damage* (*Shanghan Lun*, 《伤寒论》) which provides distinct explanations for each.
However, regarding warm-heat diseases, people casually assume that Zhang Zhongjing did not mention them, thereby feeling free to propose their own views. They often first transfer warm-heat diseases into other channels or reclassify them as different syndromes, much like a game of chess, where no two cases are exactly alike. For instance: Yu Jiayan transferred the disease to the Shaoyin Kidney channel; Zhou Yuzai transferred it to the Shaoyang Gallbladder channel; Shu Chiyuan transferred it to the Taiyin Spleen channel; Gu Jingwen transferred it to the Taiyin Lung channel; [someone] transferred it to the Jueyin Pericardium channel; Qin Huangshi transferred it to the Southern region; Wu Jutong transferred it to the Upper Jiao (Upper Burner); Chen Suzhong and Yang Lishan transferred it to "miscellaneous qi" (Zaqi, 杂气); Zhang Xugu and Wang Mengying transferred it to "external contraction" (Waigan, 外感); even more severely, Zhang Jiebin, Zhang Shiweng, and Dai Tianzhang all transferred it to "plague" (Wenyi, 瘟疫); and Zhang Shiweng further transferred it to "cold-clamping" (Jia Yin, 夹阴). These arguments are eloquent and seem to have their own logic, yet they fail to realize that the Yangming channel is the source of warm-heat formation, a view consistent throughout history, with treatment always relying on the Yangming formulas from the *Treatise on Cold Damage*. It is precisely because these individuals wish to abolish the use of Yangming formulas that they must first remove Yangming disease from the concept of the Yangming channel. This is not my intentional criticism; if this were not the case, why would those who pull arguments from left and right discard the established methods passed down through millennia? Yu Mo said, "Great faults committed unintentionally may be pardoned; small faults committed intentionally cannot be excused." Transferring the disease location out of ignorance is unintentional error, which is pardonable; transferring it knowingly is intentional misconduct, which is unforgivable. Peering into their hidden motives, it seems this goes beyond mere clarity or obscurity. Future authors may devise other methods of transference, ultimately aiming to make the world forget Zhang Zhongjing, so that people might prefer their convenient approaches and novel theories. These are all attempts to move warm-heat diseases away from Yangming. Furthermore, there are those who know the disease is in Yangming but insist that *Shanghan* formulas cannot be used, instead creating new prescriptions with only one or two herbs, claiming these were unknown to Zhang Zhongjing. In reality, apart from these one or two herbs, they still rely on Ge Gen (Puerariae Radix), Shi Gao (Gypsum Fibrosum), and Huang Qin (Scutellariae Radix) from the *Treatise on Cold Damage*. One need only ask what herbs Huang Kunzai and Yang Lishan used besides Qing Ping (likely referring to a specific herb or typo in original context, kept as Qingping), Can (Silkworm), and Chan (Cicada) to see this. This constitutes secretly appropriating *Shanghan* formulas while openly denouncing the *Treatise on Cold Damage*, a method of "transferring by not transferring." I hope scholars dedicated to this path do not be misled by this "method of transference," nor believe that Zhang Zhongjing's works apply only to cold syndromes, leading them to doubt that *Shanghan* formulas can truly treat warm-heat diseases. Such an outcome would be a blessing for our medical tradition and for patients alike.