余素不知医。二十年前家居时,见戚里中多为庸手所误,每戒病者,勿轻延医,
勿轻服药。嗣于家表兄宗之山处,得见陈子远公所着《辨证录》,试之无不奇效。知
其书自浙得来,惜其为抄本,无以广其传也。十六年,余官于浙,亟求是书,乃得
黄退庵刻本。奉使来滇,置一部于行箧,试之亦无不奇效。惜其板之在浙者,久经
散失,窃欲付梓以广其传,而独力难成,商之李石渠、周宁斋、硕致堂,各愿共襄
此举,遂于滇中付剞劂焉。前人有言∶药虽用于己手,方多出于古人。是书不但传
方,而先辨证,证见乎外者也。人之虚实、寒热,伏于内者不可知,见于外者显可
辨。得是书者,先即其证审之,症确而药可有功,即是书亦不至无补云。
时嘉庆二十二年岁在丁丑秋九月安邑郭淳章识
丁卯秋,余客燕市,黄菊初放,怀人自远,忽闻剥啄声,启扉迓之,见二
老者,衣冠伟甚,余奇之,载拜问曰∶先生何方来,得毋有奇闻诲铎乎?二老者
曰∶闻君好医,特来辨难耳。余谢不敏。二老者曰∶君擅著作才,何不着书自雄,
顾 时艺,窃耻之。余壮其言。乃尚论《灵》、《素》诸书,辨脉辨证,多非世
间语。余益奇之。数共晨夕,遂尽闻绪论,阅五月别去。训铎曰∶今而后君可出而
着书矣。铎退而记忆,合以所试方,日书数则,久乃成帙。夫医道之难也,不辨脉
罔识脉之微,不辨证罔识证之变。今世人习诊者亦甚多矣,言人人殊,究不得其指
归,似宜辨脉,不必辨证也。虽然,辨脉难知,不若辨证易知也。古虽有从脉不从
证之文,毕竟从脉者少,从证者众,且证亦不易辨也。今人所共知者,不必辨也,
古人所已言者,不必辨也。必取今人之所不敢言,与古人之所未及言者,而畅辨之。
论其证之所必有,非诡其理之所或无,乍闻之而奇,徐思之而实未奇也。客曰∶布
帛菽粟,可以活人,安在谈医之必奇乎。余谢之曰∶布帛菽粟,平淡无奇,而活人
之理实奇也。日服之而不知其何以温,日食之而不知其何以饱,致使其理之彰可乎,
铎之辨证,犹谈布帛菽粟之理耳。客又笑曰∶君辨理奇矣,已足显著作之才,奚必
托仙以 奇耶。铎,尼山之弟子也,敢轻言著作乎。闻二先生教,亦述之而已
矣,何必讳其非仙哉。仙不必讳,而必谓是书非述也,得毋欺世以 奇乎。书非
奇,而仍以奇闻名者,以铎闻二先生之教,不过五阅月耳,数十万言,尽记忆无忘,
迷之成帙。是则可奇者乎,岂矜世以 奇哉。
山阴陈士铎敬之甫别号远公又号朱华子题于大雅堂
我向来不懂医学。二十年前在家居住时,看到亲戚邻里中很多人被平庸的医生误治,常常告诫病人,不要轻易请医生,也不要轻易服药。后来在表兄宗之山那里,看到了陈子远公所著的《辨证录》,试用后无不有奇效。知道这本书是从浙江得来的,可惜它是抄本,无法广泛流传。十六年后,我在浙江做官,急切地寻找这本书,才得到了黄退庵刻印的版本。奉命出使来到云南,带了一部书放在行囊中,试用后也无不有奇效。可惜它在浙江的刻板早已散失,我想把它刻印出版以广泛流传,但凭一己之力难以完成,于是与李石渠、周宁斋、硕致堂商量,他们都愿意共同协助完成这件事,于是在云南进行了刻印。前人说过:药虽然由我的手使用,方剂大多出自古人。这本书不仅传授方剂,而且先进行辨证,证候是表现于外部的。人的虚实、寒热,潜伏在内部是不可知的,表现于外部的则明显可以辨别。得到这本书的人,先根据证候来审查它,症状确切而药物才能发挥作用,这样这本书也就不会没有补益了。
时在嘉庆二十二年岁次丁丑秋九月,安邑郭淳章记述。
丁卯年秋天,我客居燕京(北京),黄菊刚刚开放,怀念远方的人,忽然听到敲门声,打开门迎接,看见两位老人,衣帽非常整齐威严,我感到奇怪,拜问他们说:先生从哪里来,莫非有什么奇闻来教导我吗?两位老人说:听说您喜好医学,特地来与您辩论疑难问题罢了。我推辞说自己不聪明。两位老人说:您擅长写作才华,为什么不著书立说来称雄,却只写八股文,我对此感到羞耻。我认为他的话很有气势。于是共同讨论《灵枢》、《素问》等书籍,辨析脉象和证候,很多都不是世间常见的言论。我更加觉得他们神奇。经过数月朝夕相处,我听到了他们的理论概要,过了五个月他们告别离去。他们教导我说:从今以后您可以出来著书了。我回家后回忆,结合自己试用的方剂,每天写几条,久而久之就成集了。医学之道很难,不辨析脉象就无法识别脉象的微妙,不辨析证候就无法识别证候的变化。现在世上学习诊脉的人也很多了,每个人说法不同,最终得不到宗旨,似乎应该辨析脉象,不必辨析证候吧。虽然如此,辨析脉象难懂,不如辨析证候易懂。古代虽然有从脉不从证的记载,毕竟遵循脉象的人少,遵循证候的人多,而且证候也不容易辨别。现在大家共知的,不必辨析;古人已经说过的,不必辨析。一定要选取今人不敢说的,与古人未曾涉及的,来详尽辨析。论述证候所必然有的,不是诡辩那些可能没有的道理,乍一听觉得很神奇,慢慢思考其实并不神奇。客人说:布匹粮食,可以救人,谈医学何必一定要神奇呢。我回答说:布匹粮食,平淡无奇,但救人的道理确实神奇。每天服用却不知道它为什么温暖,每天食用却不知道它为什么饱腹,致使它的道理彰显可以吗?我的辨证,就像谈论布匹粮食的道理一样。客人又笑着说:您辨析道理很神奇,已经足以显示著作的才华,何必借助仙人来求奇呢?我是孔子的弟子,敢轻率言著书吗?听从两位先生的教诲,也只是阐述而已,何必忌讳不是仙人呢。不必忌讳是仙人,但一定说这本书不是阐述,岂不是欺世盗名以求奇吗?书本身不神奇,却仍然以神奇闻名,是因为我听取两位先生的教诲,不过五个月而已,数十万言,全部记忆不忘,编纂成集。这倒是可以神奇的地方吗?难道是向世人夸耀以求奇吗?
山阴陈士铎敬之甫别号远公又号朱华子题于大雅堂
I originally knew nothing about medicine. Twenty years ago, while living at home, I observed that many relatives and neighbors were harmed by mediocre physicians. I frequently advised patients not to hastily engage a doctor nor to take medication lightly. Later, at the residence of my cousin Zong Zhishan, I encountered *Bian Zheng Lu* (Record of Syndrome Differentiation) authored by Chen Yuan Gong. Upon trial, it proved remarkably effective. Knowing that this book originated from Zhejiang, I regretted that it existed only as a manuscript copy, preventing its widespread dissemination. Sixteen years later, while serving as an official in Zhejiang, I eagerly sought this book and finally obtained the edition printed by Huang Tui An. When I was sent on a mission to Yunnan, I kept a copy in my travel chest; trials there also yielded remarkable results. Regrettably, the printing blocks in Zhejiang had long been lost. I wished to have it printed to facilitate its spread, but could not accomplish this alone. I consulted Li Shiqu, Zhou Ningzhai, and Shuo Zhitang, who all agreed to support this endeavor. Thus, the book was printed in Yunnan. As the ancients said: "Although the herbs are used by my own hands, the prescriptions mostly originate from the ancients." This book not only transmits prescriptions but emphasizes syndrome differentiation first. Syndromes manifest externally. The deficiency or excess, cold or heat within a person are hidden and unknowable internally, whereas those manifesting externally are clearly distinguishable. Those who obtain this book should first examine the syndromes. If the symptoms are accurate, the medication can be effective, ensuring this book is not without benefit.
Recorded by Guo Chunzhang of Anyi in the ninth month of autumn, Ding Chou year, the 22nd year of the Jiaqing reign.
In the autumn of the Ding Mao year, I was a guest in Yan Shi (Beijing). Yellow chrysanthemums were just blooming. Missing friends from afar, I suddenly heard knocking at the door. Opening it to welcome the visitor, I saw two elderly men dressed in very dignified attire. I found this strange and bowed, asking them: "From where do you come, Sirs? Do you perhaps have rare knowledge to instruct me?" The two elders said: "We heard of your interest in medicine and have come specifically to discuss difficult cases." I declined, claiming my lack of aptitude. The elders said: "You possess literary talent; why not write a book to establish your reputation, instead of merely writing eight-legged essays, which I find shameful." I was impressed by their words. We then discussed classics such as *Ling Shu* (Spiritual Pivot) and *Su Wen* (Basic Questions), differentiating pulse and syndrome. Their discussions often contained insights not commonly found in the world. I found them even more extraordinary. After spending mornings and evenings together for several months, I absorbed their theoretical outlines. They departed after five months, instructing me: "From now on, you may proceed to write a book." Upon returning home, I recalled our discussions and combined them with my tested prescriptions, writing down several entries daily until they formed a collection. The difficulty of medical practice lies in the fact that without differentiating the pulse, one cannot grasp its subtleties; without differentiating the syndrome, one cannot understand its variations. Many people today learn diagnosis, yet each speaks differently, failing to reach a consensus. It might seem appropriate to focus on pulse differentiation rather than syndrome differentiation. However, although pulse differentiation is difficult to master, syndrome differentiation is easier to comprehend. Although ancient texts mention following the pulse over the syndrome, few actually follow the pulse, while many follow the syndrome. Moreover, syndrome differentiation is not easy. What is already known to everyone need not be differentiated; what has already been stated by the ancients need not be differentiated. One must select what contemporaries dare not say and what ancients did not cover, and elaborate upon them thoroughly. Discussing what is necessarily present in a syndrome, rather than speculating on improbable theories, may seem strange at first hearing, but upon reflection, it is not truly strange. A guest asked: "Cloth and grain can save lives; why must medical discourse be strange?" I replied: "Cloth and grain are plain and unremarkable, yet the principle of saving lives is indeed wondrous. One consumes them daily without knowing how they provide warmth or satiety, yet their efficacy is evident. My syndrome differentiation is akin to discussing the principles of cloth and grain." The guest laughed again: "Your discussion of principles is strange enough to demonstrate your literary talent; why rely on immortals to seek strangeness? I am a disciple of Confucius; how dare I casually claim authorship? Hearing the teachings of the two masters, I merely recount them. Why hide the fact that I am not an immortal? There is no need to hide being an immortal, but if you insist this book is not a recounting, are you not deceiving the world to appear strange? The book itself is not strange, yet it gains fame for being strange because I memorized hundreds of thousands of words from the two masters' teachings within five months, compiling them into a volume. Is this what is truly strange? Or am I merely boasting to the world?"
Chen Shiduo, courtesy name Jingzhi, pseudonym Yuangong, also known as Zhu Huazi, inscribed at Daya Hall.