自序又云。撰用素问九卷。八十一难。阴阳大论。胎胪药录。并平脉辨证。作伤寒杂病论合十六卷。盖伤寒三阴
三阳。乃原于素问九卷。伤寒中风温病等之目。本于八十一难。其他如阴阳大论。虽未知何等书。然要之纂旧典
之文。而编着者。非悉仲景之创论立方也。元吴澄作活人书辨序曰。汉末张仲景着伤寒论。予尝叹东汉之文气。
无复能如西都。独医家此书。渊奥典雅。焕然三代之文。心一怪之。及观仲景于序。卑弱殊甚。然后知序乃仲景
自序。而伤寒论。即古汤液论。盖上世遗书。仲景特编纂云尔。吴氏此说。原于士安。其论未可定然。但至论文
章之更变。则虽非我医家所能及。似宜以资考镜也。林亿等校定序曰。张仲景汉书无传。见名医录。云。按皇甫
谧甲乙经序。晋书皇甫谧传。其被称于当时可见。晋去汉不远。其言如此。仲景虽于汉书无传。其为汉末人无疑
矣。后汉书刘表传曰。建安三年。长沙太守张羡率零陵桂阳三郡畔表。表遣兵攻围。破羡平之。英雄记曰。张羡
南阳人。盖仲景羡之族。岂表破羡之后。使仲景代之乎。林亿等校定序又曰。自仲景于今。八百余年。惟王叔和
能学之。成无己亦曰。仲景之书。逮今千年。而显用于世者。王叔和之力也。盖仲景书。当三国兵燹之余。残缺
失次。若非叔和撰集。不能延至于今。功莫大矣,而明洪武中芗溪黄氏作伤寒类证辨惑曰。仲景之书。六经至劳
复而已。其间是三百九十七法。一百一十三方。纤悉毕备。有条而不紊也。辨脉平脉伤寒例三篇。叔和采摭群书。
附以己意。虽
间有仲景说。实三百九十七法之外者也。 湿 一篇。出金匮要略。叔和反编入于六经之右。又有汗吐下可不可。
并汗吐下后证。叔和重集于篇末云。此说原乎王履溯洄集。但履以伤寒例。为仲景旧文也。从此而降。方有执喻
昌柯琴辈。从而宗其说。或驳或贬。以加诋 。如序例。则云搜采仲景旧论。外台乃载其文。揭以王叔和曰。则
此一篇。叔和所撰。非敢伪托而作也。至辨脉。平脉。汗吐下可不可等篇。叔和既于脉经中引其文。以为仲景语。
高湛养生论曰。王叔和性沉静。好着述。考核遗文。采摭群言。撰脉经十卷。叔和脉经序亦曰。今撰集岐伯以来。
逮于华佗经论要决。合为十卷。其王阮傅戴吴葛吕张所传异同。咸悉载录。伤寒例固多不合仲景之绳墨。而言属
荒谬者。然叔和亦一名士也。岂有以我所立论。嫁名于前贤。而为采摭于已着书中。如毒手狡狯之伎俩乎。阴阳
五行汉儒好谈之。五脏六腑,经络流注。史记扁仓传。间及于此。汉志亦重载其书目。仲景生于汉末。何独屏去。
今根据临川吴氏之言而考之。如六经至劳复。文辞典雅蕴奥者,系于所撰用古经之文。其他言涉迂拘。而文气早弱。
世人以为叔和所羼入者。岂知非却是仲景之笔乎。因意伤寒例。及原文中。或曰。疑非仲景方。或曰。无大黄恐
不为大柴胡汤。或本云等之语。皆叔和所录,其语气明显。此余尽是仲景旧文。而其义前后矛盾。文理暧昧难晓
者。古书往往有之。又何疑焉。方喻诸家。逐条更定。删改字句。以为复仲景之旧。殊不知益乖本来。惑乱后人。
莫此为甚。视诸叔和。其功罪之轻重。果奈何也。张遂辰仲景全书卷首。载医林列传曰。王叔和撰次张仲景方论。
为三十六卷。大行于世。此原出于太平御览。引高湛养生论。然隋志等。不载三十六卷目。汪琥曰。仲景为伤寒
杂病论十六卷。叔和编次。何至遽增二十卷书邪。则云三十六卷。误矣。要之伤寒论一部。全是性命之书。其所
关系大矣。故读此书者。涤尽胸中成见。宜于阴阳表里。虚实寒热之分。发汗吐下。攻备和温之别。而痛着工夫。
欲方临证处疗。身亲试验之际。而无疑殆也。其中或有条理 牾。字句钩棘。不易晓者。勿敢妄为穿凿。大
抵施之行事。深切着明者。经义了然。无太难解者。太阳病。头痛发热。汗出恶风者。桂枝汤主之之类。岂不至
平至易乎。学人就其至平至易处。而细勘研审。辨定真假疑似之区别。而得性命上之神理。是为之得矣。其所难
解释。诸家费曲说者。纵令钻究其旨。不免隔靴抓痒。如以其不的确明讲者。施之于方术。则害于性命。亦不可
测。然则其所难解释者。置诸阙如之例而可也。谚云。开卷了然。临证茫然。是医家之通患。学人宜致思于此。
亦何苦以诋诘古人为事乎哉。
又按南阳府志载清张三翼募建张医圣祠序。桑芸张仲景先生祠墓记。称南阳郡东南阜处。父老相传。为先生
墓。与故宅存在。洪武初。有指挥郭云仆其碑。墓遂没。越二百六十余年。为崇祯戊辰,有兰阳诸生冯应鳌者。
感寒疾殆危。恍惚中。有神人抚体。百节通快。问之曰。汉长沙太守南阳张仲景也。城东四里许有祠。祠后七十
七步有墓。今将凿井其上。封之惟子。后病愈。千里走南阳。访之不可得。因谒三皇庙。有仲景像。即纪石庙中
而去。后数年。园丁掘井得石碣。题曰汉长沙太守医圣张仲景墓云。其言荒唐不足信矣。三异序中。仲景名作玑。
字考机古与玑通。书舜曲。璇玑玉衡。释文云。玑。本作机。晋书陆机字士衡。可以证矣。
The preface also states: "In compiling this work, I utilized the *Suwen* (Basic Questions) nine volumes, the *Nanjing* (Classic of Difficult Issues), the *Yinyang Dalun* (Great Treatise on Yin and Yang), the *Tailu Yaolu* (Record of Fetal Development and Pharmacology), combined with pulse differentiation and syndrome identification, to compose the *Shanghan Zabing Lun* (Treatise on Cold Damage and Miscellaneous Diseases), totaling sixteen volumes." Generally, the three Yin and three Yang syndromes of cold damage originate from the *Suwen* nine volumes; the categories such as cold damage, wind strike, and warm disease are based on the *Nanjing*. As for the *Yinyang Dalun*, although it is unknown which specific book it refers to, it is essentially a compilation of ancient canonical texts. Therefore, it is not entirely Zhang Zhongjing's original theories and prescriptions.
Wu Cheng of the Yuan Dynasty wrote the preface to his *Huoren Shu Bian* (Differentiation of the Living Person Book), stating: "Zhang Zhongjing of the late Han Dynasty authored the *Shanghan Lun* (Treatise on Cold Damage). I often sighed that the literary style of the Eastern Han did not compare to that of the Western Han. Only in medical literature does this book stand out, profound and elegant, shining like the literature of the Xia, Shang, and Zhou dynasties. I found this strange. However, upon seeing Zhang Zhongjing's humble self-deprecation in the preface, I realized that the preface was indeed written by Zhang Zhongjing himself, and the *Shanghan Lun* is actually the ancient *Tangye Lun* (Treatise on Decoctions). It is likely a surviving text from antiquity, which Zhang Zhongjing merely compiled and edited." Wu's theory originates from Huangfu Mi (courtesy name Shian), but its validity cannot be definitively established. Nevertheless, regarding the evolution of literary styles, even if non-medical scholars cannot match it, it serves as a valuable reference for textual research.
Lin Yi and others stated in their collated preface: "Zhang Zhongjing has no biography in the *Book of Han* (Hanshu), but appears in the *Records of Famous Doctors*. According to the preface of Huangfu Mi's *Jiayi Jing* (Systematic Classic of Acupuncture and Moxibustion) and the *Biography of Huangfu Mi* in the *Book of Jin* (Jinshu), his reputation at the time was evident. Since the Jin Dynasty was not far removed from the Han Dynasty, his account is credible. Although Zhang Zhongjing lacks a biography in the *Hanshu*, he was undoubtedly a figure of the late Han Dynasty." The *Book of Later Han* (Houhanshu) records in the Biography of Liu Biao: "In the third year of Jian'an, Zhang Xian, the Administrator of Changsha, led the three commanderies of Lingling and Guiyang to rebel against Liu Biao. Liu Biao sent troops to besiege and defeat Zhang Xian." The *Heroic Records* (Yingxiong Ji) notes: "Zhang Xian was from Nanyang." He was likely a clansman of Zhang Zhongjing. Was it possible that after Liu Biao defeated Zhang Xian, Zhang Zhongjing succeeded him?
Lin Yi's collated preface further states: "Since Zhang Zhongjing, eight hundred years have passed. Only Wang Shuhe could learn from him." Cheng Wuji also said: "Zhang Zhongjing's works have reached us over a millennium. Their prominence in the world is due to Wang Shuhe's efforts." Zhang Zhongjing's texts were fragmented and disordered after the wars of the Three Kingdoms. Without Wang Shuhe's compilation, they would not have survived to the present day; his merit is immense.
However, during the Hongwu era of the Ming Dynasty, Huang Xi of Xiangxi wrote *Shanghan Leizheng Bianhuo* (Discernment and Confusion Regarding Cold Damage Syndrome Differentiation), arguing: "Zhang Zhongjing's book covers only from the Six Channels to fatigue recovery. It contains 397 methods and 113 formulas, meticulously complete and orderly. The chapters 'Bian Mai' (Differentiating Pulse), 'Ping Mai' (Leveling Pulse), and 'Shanghan Li' (Cold Damage Examples) were collected by Wang Shuhe from various sources, appended with his own opinions. Although they occasionally contain Zhang Zhongjing's words, they fall outside the scope of the 397 methods. The chapter on 'Dampness' comes from the *Jingui Yaolue* (Essential Prescriptions of the Golden Cabinet), yet Wang Shuhe erroneously placed it after the Six Channels sections. He also recompiled discussions on the indications and contraindications of sweating, vomiting, and purging, along with post-treatment syndromes, at the end of the volume." This view originated from Wang Lv's *Suhui Ji*, who believed the *Shanghan Li* was Zhang Zhongjing's original text. Subsequently, Fang Youzhi, Yu Chang, Ke Qin, and others followed this view, either refuting or denigrating it. For instance, regarding the Preface and Examples, they claimed these were gathered from Zhang Zhongjing's old theories. The *Waitai Miyao* cites them attributing them to Wang Shuhe, implying Wang Shuhe authored this section rather than forging it. As for the chapters on Pulse Differentiation, Leveling Pulse, and Purging Indications, Wang Shuhe cited them in his *Mai Jing* (Pulse Classic) as Zhang Zhongjing's words. Gao Zhan's *Yangsheng Lun* states: "Wang Shuhe had a quiet nature, loved writing, examined lost texts, collected diverse views, and compiled the *Mai Jing* in ten volumes." Wang Shuhe's preface to the *Mai Jing* also says: "I have now compiled essential theories from Qibo down to Hua Tuo into ten volumes, recording all variations transmitted by Wang, Ruan, Fu, Dai, Wu, Ge, Lu, and Zhang." While the *Shanghan Li* contains many inconsistencies with Zhang Zhongjing's standards and absurd statements, Wang Shuhe was a renowned scholar. Would he truly attribute his own theories to ancient sages and record them in his own published works using such deceitful tactics?
Yin-Yang and Five Elements were favored topics among Han Confucians. The internal organs, meridians, and flow of Qi and Blood are mentioned in the *Records of the Grand Historian* (Shiji) biographies of Bian Que and Cang Gong, and heavily listed in the *Bibliographic Treatise* (Yiwenzhi) of the *Book of Han*. Why would Zhang Zhongjing, living in the late Han, exclude them? Based on the arguments of Wu of Linchuan, we can examine this: The sections from the Six Channels to fatigue recovery, with their elegant and profound language, belong to the ancient classics he utilized. Other parts, which seem pedantic and stylistically weak, are often attributed by modern readers to Wang Shuhe's interpolations. Could it be that these are actually Zhang Zhongjing's own writings? Thus, phrases like "some say," "suspected not to be Zhang Zhongjing's formula," or "originally stated 'etc.'" in the *Shanghan Li* and other texts appear to be recordings by Wang Shuhe. These are clearly Zhang Zhongjing's original texts. The contradictions in meaning and obscure logic are common in ancient books; why doubt them? Fang Youzhi, Yu Chang, and others attempted to restore the original text by deleting and modifying sentences line by line. Unknowingly, they deviated further from the original truth and confused later generations more severely than Wang Shuhe did. Compared to Wang Shuhe, who is more culpable?
Zhang Suichen's *Complete Works of Zhang Zhongjing* includes a "Biographies of Medical Forest" stating: "Wang Shuhe compiled Zhang Zhongjing's formulas and theories into thirty-six volumes, widely circulated." This derives from the *Taiping Yulan* citing Gao Zhan's *Yangsheng Lun*. However, the *Sui Shu·Jingji Zhi* does not list thirty-six volumes. Wang Hu argues: "Zhang Zhongjing wrote the *Shanghan Zabing Lun* in sixteen volumes. How could Wang Shuhe's compilation suddenly add twenty volumes? Thus, the claim of thirty-six volumes is erroneous."
In summary, the *Shanghan Lun* is a book concerning life and death, of great significance. Readers should clear their preconceptions, carefully distinguish Yin/Yang, exterior/interior, deficiency/excess, and cold/heat, and understand the differences between sweating, vomiting, purging, attacking, tonifying, harmonizing, and warming. They must apply themselves diligently so that when facing clinical practice and personal experimentation, there is no hesitation. If there are logical contradictions or difficult phrasing, one should not force interpretations. Generally, practical applications that are clear and explicit, such as "For Taiyang disease (disease of the Taiyang channel) presenting with headache, fever, sweating, and aversion to wind, Guizhi Tang (Cinnamon Twig Decoction) is the primary treatment," are simple and easy to grasp. Scholars should study these accessible aspects carefully, distinguishing true from false and similar from different, thereby grasping the profound principles of life. This constitutes true mastery. Conversely, difficult explanations where scholars expend effort on convoluted theories may amount to scratching an itch from outside the boot. Applying uncertain interpretations to medical practice can endanger lives unpredictably. Therefore, unresolved difficulties should be left as open questions. As the proverb goes: "Clear when reading,茫然 (at a loss) when treating." This is a common flaw among physicians. Scholars should reflect on this rather than obsessing over criticizing ancients.
Furthermore, according to the *Nanyang Prefecture Gazetteer*, in the preface by Zhang Sanyi for the construction of the Temple of Medical Sage Zhang, and Sang Yun's *Record of the Shrine and Tomb of Mr. Zhang Zhongjing*, it is recorded that elders in the southeastern highlands of Nanyang Commandery相传 (pass down the tradition) that this is Mr. Zhang's tomb, existing alongside his former residence. In the early Hongwu period of the Ming Dynasty, Commander Guo Yun toppled the stele, causing the tomb to be buried. Over 260 years later, in the Wuchen year of Chongzhen, Feng Ying'ao, a student from Lanyang, suffered from a critical cold-disease. In a trance, a divine being touched his body, bringing relief to all joints. When asked, the spirit replied: "I am Zhang Zhongjing, Administrator of Changsha and native of Nanyang. There is a shrine about four li east of the city, and a tomb seventy-seven steps behind it. I will seal it above you [the well site]." After recovering, Feng traveled a thousand li to Nanyang to search but failed. He then visited the Temple of the Three Sovereigns, saw an image of Zhang Zhongjing, inscribed a stone tablet in the temple, and departed. Years later, a gardener digging a well unearthed a stone stele inscribed: "Tomb of Zhang Zhongjing, Administrator of Changsha of the Han Dynasty, Medical Sage." Such accounts are absurd and unreliable. Note that in the "Three Anomalies" preface, Zhang Zhongjing's given name is written as Ji (玑), courtesy name Kaoji. In ancient times, Ji and Ji were interchangeable. The *Book of Documents* (Shangshu) mentions "Xuanji Yuheng," and commentaries state: "Ji was originally written as Ji." The *Book of Jin* records Lu Ji's courtesy name as Shiheng, which confirms this usage.