余读勋臣先生《医林改错》一书,而叹天下事,有人力为之者,有天意成之者。先生是
书,
之一游也。此岂非天假之缘,而使数千载之误,由先生而正之哉!帷膈膜一事,留心三十年
,
哉!至先生立方医疾,大抵皆以约治博。上卷着五十种血瘀之症,以三方治之。下卷论半身
不遂,以一方治之,并审出未病以前四十种气虚之形症,非细心何能至此。论吐泻转筋,治
分攻补两途,方由试验中来;论小儿抽风非中风,以大补元气一方治之,以不能言之儿,查
出二十种气虚之形症,平素细心不问可知;论痘非胎毒,痘浆非血化,以六方治古人不治之
六十种逆痘,颇有效者。先生之书,大抵补前人之未及,而在气虚血瘀之症为多,今特揭诸
篇首。
知非子书
余着《医林改错》一书,非治病全书,乃记脏腑之书也。其中当尚有不实不尽之处,后
人倘
外感内伤,伤人何物,有余不足,是何形状。至篇中文义多粗浅者,因业医者学问有深浅也
。前后语句多复重者,恐心粗者前后不互证也。如半身不遂内有四十种气亏之症,小儿抽风
门有二十种气虚之症,如遇杂症,必于六十种内互考参观,庶免谬误。望阅是书者,须详审
焉。
玉田王清任书
古人曰∶既不能为良相,愿为良医。以良医易而良相难。余曰∶不然。治国良相,世代
皆有
本先失。病本既失,纵有绣虎雕龙之笔,裁云补月之能,病情与脏腑,绝不相符。此医道无
全人之由来也。
夫业医诊病,当先明脏腑。尝阅古人脏腑论及所绘之图,立言处处自相矛盾。如古人论
脾胃
磨胃化食,脾不动则食不化?论脾之动静,其错误如是。其论肺,虚如蜂窠,下无透窍,吸
之则满,呼之则虚。既云下无透窍,何得又云肺中有二十四孔,行列分布,以行诸脏之气?
论肺之孔窍,其错误又如是。其论肾有两枚,即腰子,两肾为肾,中间动气为命门。既云中
间动气为命门,何得又云左肾为肾,右肾为命门,两肾一体,如何两立其名,有何凭据?若
以中间动气为命门,藏动气者,又何物也?其论肾错误又如是。其论肝,左右有两经,即血
管,从两胁肋起,上贯头目,下由少腹环绕阴器,至足大趾而止。既云肝左右有两经,何得
又云肝居于左,左胁属肝?论肝分左右,其错误又如是。其论心,为君主之官,神明出焉,
意藏于心,意是心之机,意之所专曰志,志之动变曰思,以思谋远曰虑,用虑处物曰智,五
者皆藏于心。既藏于心,何得又云脾藏意智,肾主伎巧,肝主谋虑,胆主决断?据所论,处
处皆有灵机,究竟未帮助生灵机者何物,藏灵机者何所,若用灵机,外有何神情,其论心如
此
门上输于脾肺,宣播于诸脉。此段议论,无情无理。胃下口名曰幽门,即小肠上口。其论小
肠
自肛门出,水归膀胱为尿。如此论,尿从粪中渗出,其气当臭,尝用童子小便,并问及自饮小便
之人,只言味咸,其气不臭。再者,食与水合化为粪,粪必稀溏作泻,在鸡鸭无小便则可,在
马牛有小便则不可,何况乎人?看“小肠化食,水自阑门出”一节,真是千古笑谈。其论心包
络,细筋如丝,与心肺相连者,心包络也。又云心外黄脂是心包络。又云心下横膜之上,竖膜
之下,黄脂是心包络。又云膻中有名无形者,乃心包络也。既云有名无形,何得又云手中指之
经,乃是手厥阴心包络之经也?论心包络竟有如许之多,究竟心包络是何物,何能有如许之
多耶?其论三焦,更为可笑。《灵枢》曰∶手少阴三焦主乎上,足太阳三焦主乎下,已是两三
焦矣。《难经·三十一难》论三焦∶上焦在胃之上,主内而不出;中焦在胃中脘,主腐熟水谷
;下焦在脐下,主分别清浊。又云∶三焦者,水谷之道路。此论三焦是有形之物。又云∶两肾
中间动气,是三焦之本。此论三焦是无形之气。在《难经》一有形、一无形,又是两三焦。王
叔和所谓有名无状之三焦者,盖由此也。至陈无择以脐下脂膜为三焦,袁淳甫以人身着内一层
,形色最赤者为三焦,虞天民指空腔子为三焦,金一龙有前三焦、后三焦之论。论三焦者,不
可以指屈,有形无形,诸公尚无定准,何得云手无名指之经,是手少阳三焦之经也?其中有自
相矛盾者,有
余尝有更正之心,而无脏腑可见,自恨着书不明脏腑,岂不是痴人说梦,治病不明脏腑
,何
,四月初旬,游于滦州之稻地镇,其时彼处小儿正染瘟疹痢症,十死八九,无力之家多半用
代席裹埋。代席者,代棺之席也。彼处乡风,更不深埋,意在犬食,利于下胎不死,故各义
冢中,破腹露脏之儿,日有百余。余每日压马过其地,初未尝不掩鼻,后因念及古人所以错
论脏腑,皆由未尝亲见,遂不避污秽,每日清晨,赴其义 ,就群儿之露脏者细视之,犬食
之余,大约有肠胃者多,有心肝者少,互相参看,十人之内,看全不过三人,连视十日,大
约看全不下三十余人,始知医书中所绘脏腑形图,与人之脏腑全不相合,即件数多寡亦不相
符。惟胸中膈膜一片,其薄如纸,最关紧要,及余看时皆以破坏,未能验明在心下心上、是
斜是正,最为遗憾。至嘉庆四年六月,余在奉天府,有辽阳州一妇,年二十六岁,因疯疾打
死其夫与翁,解省拟剐。跟至西关,忽然醒悟,以彼非男子,不忍近前。片刻,行刑者提其
心与肝肺从面前过,细看与前次所看相同。后余在京,时嘉庆庚辰年,有打死其母之剐犯,
行刑于崇文门外吊桥之南,却得近前,及至其处,虽见脏腑,膈膜已破,仍未得见。道光八
年五月十四日,剐逆犯张格尔,及至其处,不能近前。自思一篑未成,不能终止。不意道光
九年十二月十三日夜间,有安定门大街板厂胡同恒宅请余看症,因谈及膈膜一事,留心四十
年,未能审验明确。内有江宁布政司恒敬公,言伊芳曾镇守哈密,领兵于喀什噶尔,所见诛戮
逆尸最多,于膈膜一事,知之最悉。余闻言喜出望外,即拜叩而问之,恒公鉴余苦衷,细细
帮助形状。余于脏腑一事,访验四十二年,方得的确,绘成全图。意欲刊行于世,惟恐后人
未见脏腑,议余故叛经文。欲不刊行,复虑后世业医受祸,相沿又不知几千百年。细思黄帝
虑生民疾苦,平素以《灵枢》之言下问岐伯、鬼臾区,故名《素问》。二公如知之的确,可
对君言,知之不确,须待参考,何得不知妄对,遗祸后世。继而秦越人着《难经》,张世贤
割裂《河图洛书》为之图注,谓心肝肺以分两计之,每件重几许,大小肠以尺丈计之,每件
长若干,胃大几许,容谷几斗几升。其言仿佛是真,其实脏腑未见,以无凭之谈,作欺人之
事,利己不过虚名,损人却属实祸。窃财犹谓之盗,偷名岂不为贼。千百年后,岂无知者?
今余刻此图,并非独出己见,评论古人之短长,非欲后人知我,亦不避后人罪我,惟愿医林
中人,一见此图,胸中雪亮,眼底光明,临症有所遵循,不致南辕北辙,出言含混,病或少
失,是吾之浓望,幸仁人君子鉴而谅之。
时道光庚寅孟冬直隶玉田县王清任书于京邸知一堂
I have read Mr. Xunchen's book *Yilin Gaicuo* (Correcting Errors in the Medical Forest), and I sigh that worldly affairs are accomplished by both human effort and heavenly will. This book of his is indeed a heaven-sent opportunity to correct errors in medicine that have persisted for thousands of years, through Mr. Xunchen! Especially regarding the study of the diaphragm (diaphragm), Mr. Xunchen has paid attention to it for thirty years; truly admirable! As for Mr. Xunchen prescribing formulas to treat diseases, he generally employs simple methods to manage complex conditions. The upper volume records fifty types of blood stasis (blood stasis) syndromes, treated with three formulas; the lower volume discusses hemiplegia (hemiplegia), treated with one formula, and identifies forty pre-disease symptoms and signs of qi deficiency (qi deficiency). If one does not study carefully, how could one reach such a level? Regarding vomiting, diarrhea, and muscle spasms (tetany), treatment methods are divided into two paths: attacking pathogens (attacking pathogenic factors) and tonifying deficiency (tonifying deficiency); the formulas come from clinical trials. Regarding pediatric convulsions (pediatric convulsions) which are not wind-stroke (wind-stroke), they are treated with a formula to greatly tonify primordial qi (primordial qi). For children who cannot speak, identifying twenty types of qi deficiency symptoms requires careful observation, which is impossible without daily attentiveness. Regarding smallpox (smallpox) not being fetal toxin (fetal toxin), and smallpox pus not being transformed blood, sixty types of adverse smallpox cases, considered untreatable by ancients, are treated with six formulas, with considerable efficacy. Mr. Xunchen's book largely supplements what predecessors omitted, particularly regarding qi deficiency and blood stasis syndromes. These chapters are now highlighted at the beginning of the volume.
Written by Zhifeizi (The Man Who Recognized His Errors)
I wrote *Yilin Gaicuo* not as a comprehensive book on treating diseases, but as a record of zang-fu organs (zang-fu organs). There may still be inaccuracies and incompleteness herein. Later generations... [text implies: if you find errors] ...external contraction (external contraction) and internal injury (internal injury), what substances harm the body, and what shapes do excess and deficiency take? Some parts of the text are rudimentary because practitioners' knowledge varies in depth. Repetitive sentences are intended so that careless readers may cross-reference them. For instance, within hemiplegia there are forty types of qi depletion syndromes, and within pediatric convulsions there are twenty types of qi deficiency syndromes. When encountering miscellaneous diseases, one must cross-reference these sixty types to avoid errors. Readers must examine this book with great care.
Written by Wang Qingren of Yutian
The ancients said, "If one cannot become a good prime minister, one wishes to be a good physician." Because becoming a good physician is easier than becoming a good prime minister. I say: Not so. Good prime ministers governing the state exist in every generation. But if treating disease ignores the zang-fu organs, it is like governing the state while losing its foundation. Once the root of the disease is misunderstood, even with literary skills like embroidering tigers and carving dragons, or abilities like cutting clouds and mending the moon, the pathology will never correspond to the zang-fu organs. This is why there are no perfect physicians in the medical way.
To practice medicine and diagnose illness, one must first understand the zang-fu organs. Having read ancient discussions on zang-fu organs and their diagrams, I found their statements self-contradictory everywhere. For example, regarding the spleen and stomach (spleen and stomach): the stomach grinds food, and if the spleen does not move, food is not digested? Discussing the movement and stillness of the spleen, the error is thus. Regarding the lungs (lungs): they are described as hollow like beecombs, with no openings below; inhalation fills them, exhalation empties them. If there are no openings below, how can it also be said that the lungs have twenty-four pores arranged in rows to distribute qi to other organs? Discussing lung pores, the error is thus. Regarding the kidneys (kidneys): there are two, i.e., loins; the two kidneys are called kidneys, and the moving qi in the middle is called the Gate of Life (Gate of Life/Mingmen). If the moving qi in the middle is the Gate of Life, why is the left kidney called the kidney and the right kidney called the Gate of Life? How can two names stand for one organ? What is the evidence? If the moving qi in the middle is the Gate of Life, what substance houses this moving qi? Discussing the kidneys, the error is thus. Regarding the liver (liver): there are two meridians on the left and right, i.e., blood vessels, starting from the hypochondrium, passing up to the head and eyes, going down through the lower abdomen around the genitalia, ending at the big toe. If there are two meridians on the left and right, why is it also said that the liver resides on the left and the left hypochondrium belongs to the liver? Discussing the division of the liver into left and right, the error is thus. Regarding the heart (heart): it is the monarch official, from where spirit-mind (spirit-mind/Shen) emerges. Thought (thought/Yi) resides in the heart; thought is the mechanism of the heart; focused thought is called will (will/Zhi); the movement/change of will is called reflection (reflection/Si); using reflection to plan far ahead is called deliberation (deliberation/Lü); using deliberation to handle matters is called wisdom (wisdom/Zhi). All five reside in the heart. If they all reside in the heart, why is it also said that the spleen houses thought and wisdom, the kidneys govern skillfulness, the liver governs deliberation, and the gallbladder governs decision-making? According to the discussion, everywhere there is spiritual agency. Who ultimately helps generate this spiritual agency? Where is it housed? If spiritual agency is used, what external expressions appear? Discussing the heart, the error is thus.
[Text gap inferred] ...Stomach upper port transports to spleen and lungs, spreading through various vessels. This argument is irrational. The lower port of the stomach is named Youmen (Youmen/H pylorus), which is the upper port of the small intestine (small intestine). Its discussion on the small intestine... [text gap] ...exits via the anus, water returns to the bladder as urine. Such a discussion implies urine seeps out from feces, and thus should smell foul. I have tested child's urine (child's urine) and asked those who drink their own urine; they only say it tastes salty, not that it smells foul. Furthermore, food and water combine to form feces; feces must be loose and cause diarrhea. In chickens and ducks, having no urine is acceptable; in horses and cattle, having urine is necessary. How much more so for humans? Reading the section "Small intestine transforms food, water exits via Lanmen," it is truly a laughable topic for millennia. Discussing the pericardium (pericardium): fine fibers like silk, connected to the heart and lungs, is the pericardium. It also says yellow fat outside the heart is the pericardium. It also says above the transverse membrane below the heart, and below the vertical membrane, yellow fat is the pericardium. It also says what exists in name but not form in Danzhong (Danzhong/Chest center) is the pericardium. If it exists in name but not form, why is it also said that the meridian of the middle finger is the meridian of the Hand Jueyin Pericardium? Discussing the pericardium yields so many contradictions. What exactly is the pericardium, and how can there be so many definitions? Discussing the Sanjiao (Sanjiao/Triple Burner) is even more ridiculous. *Lingshu* (Spiritual Pivot) says: Hand Shaoyin Sanjiao dominates the upper, Foot Taiyang Sanjiao dominates the lower; this is already two Sanjiaos. *Nanjing* (Classic of Difficult Issues) Chapter 31 discusses Sanjiao: Upper Jiao is above the stomach, governing intake without exit; Middle Jiao is at Zhongwan, governing the rotting and ripening of food and drink; Lower Jiao is below the navel, governing the separation of clear and turbid. It also says: Sanjiao is the pathway of food and drink. This discussion treats Sanjiao as a tangible object. It also says: The moving qi between the two kidneys is the root of Sanjiao. This discussion treats Sanjiao as intangible qi. In *Nanjing*, one is tangible and one is intangible, creating yet another two Sanjiaos. Wang Shuhe's concept of Sanjiao having name but no shape likely stems from this. Later, Chen Wuyue identified the fatty membrane below the navel as Sanjiao; Yuan Chunfu identified the innermost layer of the body, reddest in color, as Sanjiao; Yu Tianmin pointed to the empty cavity as Sanjiao; Jin Yilong proposed anterior and posterior Sanjiaos. Those discussing Sanjiao are too numerous to count. Whether tangible or intangible, experts have no consensus. How can one say the meridian of the ring finger is the meridian of the Hand Shaoyang Sanjiao? Among these, some are self-contradictory, some... [text gap] ...
I once had the desire to correct errors, but without visible zang-fu organs, I hated that writing books without understanding zang-fu organs is like a fool talking about dreams. Treating disease without understanding zang-fu organs... [text gap] ...In early April, I traveled to Daodi Town in Luanzhou. At that time, children there were infected with epidemic rash and dysentery (epidemic rash and dysentery), nine out of ten dying. Poor families mostly wrapped them in mats meant for coffins and buried them. Local custom did not bury deeply, intending for dogs to eat the bodies, believing this prevented the fetus from dying in the womb. Thus, in public cemeteries, there were over a hundred children with exposed viscera daily. I passed by on horseback daily. Initially, I covered my nose, but later thinking that ancients erred in describing zang-fu organs because they never saw them personally, I did not shun the filth. Every morning, I went to the cemeteries to closely examine the exposed viscera of the children. After dogs had eaten, intestines and stomachs were common, but hearts and livers were rare. Comparing them, among ten bodies, fewer than three were complete. After observing continuously for ten days, seeing over thirty complete bodies, I realized that the zang-fu diagrams in medical books did not match human anatomy at all, nor did the number of organs. Only the diaphragm in the chest, thin as paper and most critical, was observed broken during my examination, preventing me from verifying if it was above or below the heart, or slanted or straight. This was my greatest regret.
In June of the fourth year of Jiaqing, I was in Fengtian Prefecture. A woman from Liaoyang Prefecture, aged twenty-six, had killed her husband and father-in-law due to madness and was sent to the provincial capital for execution by lingchi (death by a thousand cuts). Following her to the West Gate, she suddenly regained consciousness, realizing she was not a man and feeling unable to approach. Moments later, as executioners carried her heart, liver, and lungs past me, I examined them closely and found them identical to previous observations. Later in Beijing, in the Gengchen year of Jiaqing, a criminal who killed her mother was executed by lingchi south of the吊桥 (hanging bridge) outside Chongwen Gate. I managed to get close. Although I saw the viscera, the diaphragm was broken, and I still failed to see it clearly. On May 14th of the eighth year of Daoguang, the rebel Zhang Ge'er was executed by lingchi, but I could not get close. Thinking that one basket of earth remains unfinished, I could not stop. Unexpectedly, on the night of December 13th in the ninth year of Daoguang, the Heng residence in Banchang Hutong, Andingmen Street, invited me to treat an illness. Discussing the diaphragm, I had paid attention to it for forty years without clear verification. Among them was Heng Jinggong, Provincial Administration Commissioner of Jiangning, who stated he had guarded Hami and led troops in Kashgar, witnessing the most executions of rebels, and thus knew the diaphragm best. Hearing this, I was overjoyed, bowed, and asked. Heng Gong, appreciating my hardship, helped describe the shape in detail. After forty-two years of investigating and verifying zang-fu organs, I finally obtained accurate results and drew a complete diagram. I wished to publish it, fearing later generations would criticize me for contradicting classics without having seen the organs. Yet, if I did not publish, I worried future physicians would suffer from inherited errors for thousands of years. Reflecting on the Yellow Emperor's concern for people's suffering, who asked Qibo and Guiyuzhou questions based on *Lingshu*, naming the work *Suwen* (Basic Questions). If they knew accurately, they could tell the ruler; if not sure, they should refer to references. How could they answer recklessly and harm future generations? Later, Qin Yueren wrote *Nanjing*. Zhang Shixian cut apart *Hetu Luoshu* to create diagrams, stating heart, liver, and lungs are weighed, intestines measured, stomach capacity quantified. His words seemed true, but since he hadn't seen the organs, he engaged in deceptive talk for vanity, causing real harm to others. Stealing property is called theft; stealing reputation is not robbery? Thousands of years later, surely there will be those who know. Now I engrave this diagram not to claim originality or critique ancients, nor to seek fame or fear blame. I only wish that those in the medical forest, upon seeing this diagram, will have clear minds and bright eyes, follow guidelines in diagnosis, avoid going astray, speak precisely, and reduce patient loss. This is my earnest hope. I hope benevolent gentlemen will appreciate and forgive me.
Written by Wang Qingren of Yutian, Zhili, at Zhiyi Hall in Beijing, in the first month of winter in the Gengyin year of Daoguang.