中风暴仆瘫痪等证,古昔所论,皆为外中风寒有余之证,而用大小续命八方等汤,辛热
疏散
之药。及刘河间出,以为中风瘫痪者,非肝之风实,亦非外中之风邪,良由将息失宜,心火
暴甚,肾水虚衰,不能制之,则阴虚阳实,热气怫郁,心神昏冒,筋骨不用,而卒倒无知。
亦由喜怒忧恐惊,五志过极,皆为热甚。俗云风者,言末而忘其本也。至东垣则又云∶中风
非风,乃本气病也。凡人年逾四旬,气衰之际,或因忧喜忿怒伤其气者,多有此证,壮岁之
时无有也。若肥盛者间有之,亦是形盛气衰所致。然亦有贼风袭虚而中风者,有三焉∶中府
者
,病在表,多着四肢,故肢节废;中脏者,病在里,多滞九窍,故性命危;中血脉者,病在
半表半里,故口眼 斜。丹溪则论之曰∶诸书则谓外中风邪,惟刘河间作将息失宜,水火不
济,极是。若真中风邪,则东垣中腑中脏中经之说甚好,然地有不同,西北气寒,真为风所
中者有之。东南气温,皆是湿生痰,痰生热,热生风耳。有血虚,有气虚。血虚者,左手足
不仁;气虚者,右手足不仁。此三子之论,异于古说者也。至王安道出,推河间;东垣非风
之说,丹溪湿痰之言,遂以古论为真风。三子论为类风,愚窃有疑焉。夫河间既曰中风非风
,又曰风者言末而忘其本也,就风末言则有风存之意,及用防风通圣,药品虽泻火而实以治
风。东垣既曰中风,何又辨有三中之异?及致详于治风之法,丹溪既云湿生痰热,而何以又
曰生风,予因知皆未尝外于风,今别之为类风者,又何足以尽三子之旨乎?予考六经中善行
数变者,莫如风也。挟寒而为风寒,挟暑而为风暑,燥为风燥,湿为风湿,兼热则成火兼郁
则类气。古昔类风止作风寒,而不及招风取中之因,冷热虚实之变,有非辛热之可通治。故
诸
子之论,各明其因也。所谓非风者,是矫饰之辞耳,何则。凡外邪之中人,皆由气体先虚。
经曰∶邪之所凑,其气必虚。且古之通称风从汗散,而不审虚极者,难施辛散之药,恐泄其
真气,愈虚其虚,是以东垣发气本之论。俾学人知风因虚而中,当分虚实以治。又风虽为凉
气,若因火热自甚,肝风燥动,腠理疏豁,风乘热中,从火为邪,岂可例用辛温,是以出火
热之论。深知世俗止知风末,而不知有火邪之本也。又东南二地,素鲜烈风寒,虽风不易中
,间有中者,悉皆火热内盛,因虚而致。非若北地常有大风甚寒,人体略虚,衣或单薄,纯
被风寒逼中也。是以丹溪深韪河间之说,以西北真为风所中者有之。东南之人,多由痰热生
风也。风本无意中人,人自取于风也。故风本一邪,有内外出入寒热虚实之异,诸子各 精
论,何尝外于真风,而别为类风哉。但当以古论为风寒邪实外至之证,是天致病于人也。三
子论为痰热气虚内致之因,是人取病于天也。本乎外者,内轻而外重,取法于古;因于内者
,内重而外轻,始从三子定中风论。
Symptoms such as sudden collapse and paralysis in stroke were discussed in ancient times as excess syndromes caused by external invasion of Wind-Cold (Wind-Cold), and treatments used decoctions like Da Xuming Tang (Great Continuation Life Decoction) and Xiao Xuming Tang (Small Continuation Life Decoction), employing acrid-hot dispersing herbs. When Liu Hejian (Liu Wansu) emerged, he argued that stroke with paralysis was not due to Liver Wind excess, nor external Wind pathogen invasion, but rather resulted from improper lifestyle management leading to sudden暴甚 (sudden hyperactivity) of Heart Fire, and deficiency decline of Kidney Water, failing to control the Fire. This results in Yin deficiency and Yang excess, with stagnant heat causing oppression, clouding the Shen (Spirit) and rendering sinews and bones useless, leading to sudden collapse and unconsciousness. It is also due to the five emotions—Joy, Anger, Worry, Fear, and Shock—being excessive, all generating intense heat. The common term "Wind" refers only to the superficial manifestation while forgetting the root. Later, Dongyuan (Li Gao) stated: Stroke is not Wind, but a disease of the Ben Qi (Root Qi). Anyone past forty, when Qi declines, or whose Qi is damaged by sorrow, joy, or anger, often suffers this condition; it is absent in youth. Even in obese individuals, it is caused by abundant form but deficient Qi. However, there are cases where Zephyr Wind (Zephyr Wind) invades deficiency, categorized into three types: Invasion of Fu Organs affects the exterior, mostly involving the four limbs, causing limb dysfunction; Invasion of Zang Organs affects the interior, mostly obstructing the nine orifices, endangering life; Invasion of Channels and Collaterals affects the half-exterior half-interior, causing deviation of the mouth and eyes. Danxi (Zhu Zhenheng) commented: Most texts attribute stroke to external Wind pathogen, which Liu Hejian correctly identified as improper management leading to disharmony between Water and Fire. If it were true Wind pathogen, Dongyuan’s theory of Fu/Zang/Channel invasion is excellent. However, geography differs: Northwest is cold, so true Wind invasion occurs. Southeast is warm, where dampness generates Phlegm, Phlegm generates Heat, and Heat generates Wind. There is Blood deficiency and Qi deficiency. Blood deficiency causes numbness in the left limbs; Qi deficiency causes numbness in the right limbs. These three scholars’ theories differ from ancient ones. Wang Andao later promoted Liu Hejian and Dongyuan’s “Non-Wind” theory and Danxi’s “Damp-Phlegm” theory, classifying ancient views as True Wind and the three scholars’ views as Similar Wind. I have doubts. Liu Hejian said stroke is not Wind, yet mentioned Wind’s superficial aspects, and used Fangfeng Tongsheng San (Saposhnikovia Unblocking the Intestines Powder), which clears Fire but treats Wind. Dongyuan spoke of Stroke but distinguished three types of invasion. Danxi said Dampness generates Phlegm-Heat, yet also mentioned generating Wind. Thus, they did not depart from Wind. Why classify them as Similar Wind? I observe that among the Six Channels, Wind is most agile and changeable. Combined with Cold, it becomes Wind-Cold; with Summerheat, Wind-Summerheat; with Dryness, Wind-Dryness; with Dampness, Wind-Dampness; combined with Heat, it becomes Fire; combined with Stagnation, it resembles Qi stagnation. Ancient Similar Wind was treated only as Wind-Cold, ignoring causes and variations of Cold/Heat/Deficiency/Excess, which cannot be universally treated with acrid-hot herbs. Each scholar clarified specific etiologies. “Non-Wind” is merely rhetorical. Why? External pathogens invade only when Zheng Qi (Upright Qi) is deficient. The Classic states: Where pathogen gathers, Qi must be deficient. Anciently, Wind was dispersed via sweating, but if Qi is extremely deficient, acrid-dispersing herbs are contraindicated to avoid leaking Zhen Qi (True Qi) and worsening deficiency. Hence Dongyuan proposed the Root Qi theory, teaching that Wind invades due to deficiency, requiring differentiation of Deficiency/Excess. Although Wind is cool, if internal Fire is strong, Liver Wind dries and moves, pores open, and Wind enters with Heat, becoming a Fire pathogen; thus, acrid-warm herbs are inappropriate, leading to the Fire Theory. This highlights that people know Wind’s surface but ignore Fire’s root. In the Southeast, fierce Wind-Cold is rare; even if Wind invades, it is due to internal Heat excess and deficiency, unlike the North where strong Wind-Cold penetrates thin clothing and weak bodies. Thus, Danxi agreed with Liu Hejian: Northwest has true Wind invasion; Southeast has Wind generated from Phlegm-Heat. Wind does not intend to harm humans; humans invite it. Wind is one pathogen, differing in internal/external, Cold/Heat, Deficiency/Excess. Scholars discussed these nuances without departing from True Wind, hence no need for “Similar Wind.” We should regard ancient texts as describing external Wind-Cold Excess (Heaven causing disease in Man), and the three scholars as describing internal Phlegm-Heat-Qi Deficiency (Man inviting disease from Heaven). Exterior-originating cases are externally heavy, internally light, following ancient methods. Interior-originating cases are internally heavy, externally light, adopting the three scholars’ framework for Stroke theory.