知道了病机与气宜的这个关系,黄帝接着问:“愿闻病机如何?”岐伯说:“诸风掉眩,皆属于肝。诸寒收引,皆属于肾……”像这样的病机,岐伯一共回答了十九条,这就是著名的十九病机。我对十九病机的研究虽说不上很深,但已隐隐约约地感受到它的重要性。可是,现在研究它的人很少,像《中基》的病机篇,本来应该以这个十九病机为核心,可现在连提都很少提到它。这是什么原因呢?当然,是对它的重要性认识不够。以为天下的疾病那么多,那么错综复杂,怎么可以就用这简单的十九条病机加以概括、加以说明呢?十九条病机能不能作如上的概括、如上的说明呢?这个回答是肯定的!岐伯在这里用了一个“诸”和“皆”,这就是一个肯定的说法。凡是“风”,凡是“掉眩”,必定与肝有关系,你就从这个肝去找,一定能找到病机,一定能够找到导致这个疾病发生的关键因素。这一点,岐伯已经给你打了包票。以此类推,“诸痛痒疮,皆属于心”。凡是疼痛、痒、疮的一类证候,必定与心有关,你可以从心去寻找问题,至于怎么寻找,我们下面还要谈到。在岐伯陈述完这个十九病机后,他也考虑到了黄帝可能也会有类似我们一样的疑问。为了进一步地消除这些疑惑,岐伯接着引述了《大要》的一段话:“谨守病机,各司其属,有者求之,无者求之,盛者责之,虚者责之,必先五胜,疏其血气,令其条达,而致和平。”病机要谨守,不要怀疑,这一点很肯定,不容含糊。要各司其属,各就各位。风掉眩,不管你是什么风掉眩,都一定要找肝。怎么找呢?这就要落实到“有者求之,无者求之,盛者责之,虚者责之,必先五胜”这个原则上来。比如刚刚说的风掉眩,我们看到一个掉眩病,一个眩晕病,它肯定属于肝,这个没问题。病人一来,我们看到他一副肝病的模样,脸色青青,脉又弦,肝的色脉非常明显,这个就叫“有”。有者求之,这一点比较容易做到,因为它很直接。但是,如果没有呢?我们看到这个眩晕的病人,脸色也不青,脉也不弦,一点肝家的色脉都没有,这怎么办呢?这种情况就叫“无”,无者也要求之,反正它与肝有关系,这是病机规定的前提。那怎么求呢?这就要根据“必先五胜”的原则。五胜是什么意思呢?就是要根据五行之间的关系去求它。明明是眩,肯定属肝,为什么见不到肝的色脉?这个问题你要考虑,为什么会产生这个“无”?上面这个原则就是告诉我们用一个很方便的方法来找出这个原因,这个方法就是以肝为中心,利用五行生克的原则去考察。比如上面这个例子,你没有看到肝的色脉,你看到的是肾很虚的表现,那么,你应该知道这是因为肾水很虚,母不生子而导致了这个“没有”。所以,治疗就应该补母生子,用补肾的方法,这个眩晕就会好。如果肾的情况也没有,那就继续看,看看有没有肺的情况?如果有,那还要看一看盛虚。如果是肺家盛,金太过,那肝木就必遭克损,这个时候泄其太过,使木不遭克损,那疾病就自然会痊愈。如果是肺虚金不及呢?那就要用佐金平木的方法。如果还不行,再看看心怎么样?脾怎么样?心虚则子盗母气,心实则火旺克金,金不制木,这时把心火一泄,病就没了。有时又可能是土的毛病造成的,土虚亦不能育木。从上述这个过程我们可以看到,病机的方便在于它把这个中心坐标确定了,你根据这个中心点去搜寻,根据五胜的原则,生克的原则去找,这就有了目标。这就比你漫无边际地去寻找要好得多,大家看是不是这样?所以,这样的一些原则很了不起,它把一切疾病最关键的东西告诉我们了,这就是病机!导致风、导致掉、导致眩的最最关键的因素就是肝,它告诉你了。大家想一想,这在过去是什么?是秘诀,是窍门,是宝贝啊!可是我们拿着这样的宝贝却不当一回事,甚至拿着金盆当尿壶,难怪古人说:传非其人,漫泄天宝。对于上面这样一种病机辨证方法现在很少有人去研究,去关心,我打算在这方面做深入地研究,也希望大家多研究。古时候不是有治肝三十法吗,清代名医王旭高就专门有一个“治肝三十六法”,这“三十六法”怎么来?就从这儿来。还有所谓隔一、隔二、隔三、隔四的治法,明明是这一脏的病,他不治这一脏,而治另一脏。用药平平淡淡,根本看不出有一味治肝的药,却把肝病治好了。你拼命去平肝熄风,用羚羊钩藤汤、龙胆泻肝汤,治来治去没有作用。为什么呢?你没有真正搞清楚,你只知道“对病欲愈,执方欲加”,你只知道“诸风掉眩,皆属于肝”,却不知道还有一个“有者求之,无者求之,盛者责之,虚者责之”,却不知道还有一个“必先五胜”的原则,却不知道“见肝之病,知肝传脾,当先实脾”,那你当然只有“守株待兔”当下工了。所以,病机里面变化的花样很多,但是,万变不离其宗。我们利用《大要》给出的这些原则,围绕这个“宗”去寻找,就一定能够找出疾病的症结。这里我只将大体的思路提供出来,希望大家沿着这个思路去研究,并且在临床上加以应用。上面举例谈到了十九病机,也把运气的基本情况给大家谈了,我想这个感受应该比较深。现在过了小雪,我们感受到了什么气宜呢?很潮湿,人昏昏沉沉的,感冒的人特别多。这个感冒与以往的感冒不同,如果不知年之所加,不明运气,治疗这样的感冒多少会碰壁。现在是寒湿当令,而且湿特别重,有点像春天,只有春天才这样潮湿。前几天看过三个病人,一个是上腭的恶性肿瘤,一个是坐骨神经痛,一个是胃痛,三个病人我都用的同一张方,就是《和剂局方》的五积散,结果除恶性肿瘤的这一例因特殊的原因没能服药以外,其余两例都有不错的效果。三病不同而治同,这叫作“异病同治”。其实,既然治同,那肯定有相同的因素,这个因素就是气宜。因此,气宜把握好了,病机就容易审察清楚,病机清楚了,治疗的方案就很容易制定出来。这实在是临床上一个很方便的法门。上述这例恶性肿瘤的病人年纪只有 26岁,看上去气色很差,自觉症状不多,只有头胀,微咳(已肺部转移)。切脉右弦滑,尺涩,左脉沉细,不耐按。舌淡暗,苔白水滑。像这样一个病人我们怎么去思考呢?再一看他前面服用的药,都是大量的半枝莲,白花蛇舌草。所以,我首先给他一个建议,就是马上停用这些药物。半枝莲、白花蛇舌草这些都是清热的药,如果真是热毒结聚的肿瘤,那当然用之无疑,用后确实会产生抗癌作用。但,如果是寒湿凝结的肿瘤,像上述这例病人,那再用清热的药就等于助纣为虐了。碰到癌症病人你就想到要用半枝莲,你就想到要抗癌,那你在走“对病欲愈”这条路,你是西医,不是中医。中医就要讲辨证,有是证才用是方。《内经》讲:寒者热之,热者寒之。这是必须遵循的原则。如果是寒性的病,就应该用温热药,不管你是肿瘤还是什么。上述这个病人初次发作是在 1994 年,1994 年是甲戌年,甲为土运太过,戌为太阳寒水司天,太阴湿土在泉。这样一个肿瘤病人,你很难说清他是那一天发病,他的发病界限你很难像感冒那样用天来界定。所以,这个年的框架就显得非常重要。我们知道 1994年的“年之所加,气之盛衰”主要是寒湿为盛,尤其是湿为盛,他这个病为什么不在1993年发作?也许 1993 年这个癌肿已经在孕养。它为什么一定要在 1994年爆发出来?可以肯定,1994年这样一个年运,它的六气变化对这个肿瘤的发作很有帮助,是这例肿瘤爆发的助缘,所以,它就在这样一个特殊的年运里引发出来。我们再看今年,今年是庚辰年,司天在泉同样是寒水湿土,这就给了我们一个提示,这个病跟寒湿有关。说明寒湿这样一个气肯定对他的内环境不利,对他的免疫系统不利,相反的,对这个肿瘤很有帮助。大家想一想,这个“年之所加”重不重要呢?确实很重要。如果再参照舌脉,舌脉也跟这个相应,那病机就肯定了。所以,这个病你别管它是什么,你就从寒从湿去治疗,去掉这样一些对肿瘤有利的因素,去掉这样一些对机体不利的因素,即便它不好,至少也不会助纣为虐。在讨论病机的开始,黄帝就提出这样一个问题:“夫百病之生也,皆生于风寒暑湿燥火,以之化之变也。”这里提的是百病,就是众多的疾病都受这个因素影响,没有说肿瘤例外。肿瘤也好,其他疾病也好,都受这个大环境的影响,都受这个六气综合因素的影响。你只要弄清楚这个因素,然后设法阻断它,改变它,那显然会对这个病的转归产生有利的影响。从这个角度去看,为什么五积散不能抗癌呢?五积散一样能抗癌!但是,大家就不要用它去做课题、搞实验,作出来也许没有结果。这样很多人又会对中医失望,说中医不科学,不能普适,不能重复。其实,不是中医不能普适,不能重复,而是你的这个做法根本不可能重复。五积散针对的是寒湿这样一个因素,对于寒湿,五积散是普适的,是可以重复的,如果你用它对付其他的因素,这个怎么能普适?怎么能重复?就像抗菌素它只能对细菌普适,现在你要它对病毒也普适,这个可能吗?可是现在中医的科研就是这么一个情况,拿着抗菌素去治病毒,治不好,反而怪抗菌素不好。自己错了,反而怪别人,天下哪有这样的道理。现在大家看杂志,看到最多的一类文章就是用某某方或某某法治疗某某病多少例。这个例数不能少,少了做不了统计处理,而说实在话,临床哪有这么多同类因素引起的同一种病呢?没有怎么办?那只有让风马牛也相及。这样的做法,这样的研究态度,着实令人堪忧。而我们的科研部门,我们的杂志所制定的这些政策,却对上述的歪风起到了推波助澜的作用。病机这门学问是中医的大学问,前面我们只略说了“诸风掉眩”这一条,那么,还有“诸痛痒疮,皆属于心”,“诸湿肿满,皆属于脾”,“诸暴强直,皆属于风”呢?这些也是一样,大家可以用同样的方法去逐条地剖析。反正这个前提它给你定死了,把这个前提作为中心,围绕这个中心,按照上述这些原则去搜寻,就一定能够查出实据。等到你将十九病机烂熟于胸,将搜求的方法烂熟于胸,你去治病就会左右逢源。
3.抓主证,识病机
临证何以察机,以上的这些方面非常重要,这些都是经典的教证。其次的一个方面就是“抓主证”,抓主证是刘渡舟教授提出来的。刘老是伤寒界的权威,人称北刘南陈,这个“北刘”就指的刘渡舟,“南陈”则指我的导师陈亦人教授。刘渡舟教授有部书叫《伤寒论十四讲》,这部书的篇幅虽然不大,但,讲的都是刘老的经验。这部书的最后一讲,就是这个抓主证问题。刘老认为抓主证反映了辨证论治的最高水平,因此,能否抓好主证,就成了临证的一个关键问题。为什么抓主证那么重要?我的理解有两个,其一,是主证最能反映致病的机要,也就是最能反映病机,而只有这个能够反映病机的证能称为主证;其二,是主证最有可能反映疾病的祛除途径,它提示你,你应该用汗法、下法还是吐法,或者用其他的方法。这样的主证往往起到画龙点睛的作用,根据这个证你就能辨别该从哪个方向着手。主证应该具备这两个基本特点。为什么要在《伤寒论十四讲》里提出这样的一个问题呢?很显然,张仲景的每个条文,他所描述的这些证,很多就是主证。你看他的条文很多都非常简单,如 155 条:“心下痞,而复恶寒汗出者,附子泻心汤主之。”301 条:“少阴病,始得之,反恶热,脉沉者,麻黄细辛附子汤主之。”也就是说《伤寒论》的条文实际上就贯穿着一个主证问题
Having understood the relationship between *bingji* (pathogenesis) and *qi yi* (climatic characteristics), Huangdi next asked, "I wish to hear about pathogenesis." Qibo replied, "All wind syndromes characterized by tremors and dizziness belong to the Liver. All cold syndromes characterized by contraction and pulling belong to the Kidney..." Regarding such pathogeneses, Qibo answered a total of nineteen clauses, which are known as the "Nineteen Pathogeneses" (Shijiu Bingji). Although my research on the "Nineteen Pathogeneses" is not profound, I have vaguely felt its importance. However, few people study it now. For instance, in the chapter on pathogenesis in *Basic Theory of Traditional Chinese Medicine* (*Zhongji*), which should take these "Nineteen Pathogeneses" as its core, they are rarely even mentioned. What is the reason for this? Naturally, it is due to insufficient recognition of their importance. People think that diseases in the world are so numerous and complex, how can they be summarized and explained by just these simple nineteen pathogenetic clauses? Can the "Nineteen Pathogeneses" make such summaries and explanations? The answer is affirmative! Here, Qibo used the words "zhu" (all/various) and "jie" (all/belong to), which constitutes an affirmative statement. Whenever there is "wind," or whenever there are "tremors and dizziness" (Diao Xuan), there must be a relationship with the Liver. You should search from the perspective of the Liver; you will definitely find the pathogenesis and the key factor leading to the occurrence of the disease. Qibo has already given you his guarantee on this point. By analogy, "All pain, itching, and sores belong to the Heart." For all syndromes involving pain, itching, and sores, there must be a connection with the Heart. You can look for problems from the Heart. As for how to look, we will discuss this later. After Qibo stated these "Nineteen Pathogeneses," he anticipated that Huangdi might have similar doubts as ours. To further eliminate these confusions, Qibo then quoted a passage from *Da Yao*: "Closely observe the pathogenesis, and investigate each syndrome's corresponding organ. If signs are present, seek them; if signs are absent, seek them. If excess, hold accountable; if deficiency, hold accountable. First determine the five-fold overcoming relationships, unblock the blood and qi, ensure their smooth flow, and achieve harmony." Pathogenesis must be closely observed without doubt; this is certain and leaves no room for ambiguity. Each syndrome must correspond to its respective organ. For wind-induced tremors and dizziness, regardless of the specific type, one must always look to the Liver. How to look? This requires implementing the principles of "If signs are present, seek them; if signs are absent, seek them. If excess, hold accountable; if deficiency, hold accountable. First determine the five-fold overcoming relationships." For example, regarding the aforementioned wind-induced tremors and dizziness, when we see a patient with tremors and dizziness, it undoubtedly belongs to the Liver, which is indisputable. When the patient arrives, if we see a liver-like appearance, such as a bluish complexion and a wiry pulse, indicating obvious liver color and pulse signs, this is called "present" (You). Seeking where signs are present is relatively easy because it is direct. But what if they are absent? If we see a dizzy patient whose complexion is not blue and pulse is not wiry, showing no liver color or pulse signs at all, what should we do? This situation is called "absent" (Wu). We must still seek in the absence of signs, because the premise dictated by pathogenesis is that it relates to the Liver. How to seek? This relies on the principle of "First determine the five-fold overcoming relationships." What does "five-fold overcoming" mean? It means seeking based on the relationships among the Five Elements. Clearly, dizziness belongs to the Liver, so why are no liver color/pulse signs visible? You must consider this question: why does this "absence" occur? The above principle tells us to use a convenient method to find the cause: centering on the Liver and utilizing the generation and restriction principles of the Five Elements. Taking the above example, if you do not see liver color/pulse signs but instead see signs of severe Kidney deficiency, you should understand that this "absence" is caused by deficient Kidney Water failing to generate Wood (Mother not generating Child). Therefore, treatment should involve tonifying the Mother to generate the Child, using methods to tonify the Kidney, and the dizziness will resolve. If the Kidney condition is also normal, continue to check for Lung conditions. If present, examine whether it is excess or deficiency. If the Lung is excessive, with Metal being too strong, Liver Wood will inevitably suffer restriction. At this time, drain the excess to prevent Wood from suffering restriction, and the disease will naturally heal. If the Lung is deficient with insufficient Metal, then use the method of assisting Metal to calm Wood. If that doesn't work, check the Heart. Check the Spleen. If the Heart is deficient, the Child steals from the Mother; if the Heart is excessive, Fire is strong and restricts Metal, causing Metal to fail to control Wood. In this case, draining Heart Fire will cure the disease. Sometimes, the problem may stem from Earth; deficient Earth also fails to nourish Wood. From this process, we can see that the convenience of pathogenesis lies in establishing this central coordinate. You search based on this center point, following the principles of five-fold overcoming and generation/restriction, thus having a clear target. This is much better than searching aimlessly, don't you agree? Thus, these principles are remarkable; they reveal the most crucial aspect of all diseases to us—this is pathogenesis! The most critical factor causing wind, tremors, and dizziness is the Liver, and it tells you this. Think about it, what was this in the past? It was a secret, a trick, a treasure! Yet we treat such treasures lightly, even using golden basins as chamber pots. No wonder the ancients said: "Passing [knowledge] to the wrong person leads to the careless leakage of heavenly treasures." Few people today research or care about this pathogenesis-based differentiation method. I intend to conduct in-depth research in this area and hope others will do the same. Didn't the ancients have thirty methods for treating the Liver? The famous Qing Dynasty physician Wang Xugao specifically had "Thirty-Six Methods for Treating the Liver." Where did these "Thirty-Six Methods" come from? They come from here. There are also methods described as treating the organ separated by one, two, three, or four steps. Clearly, it is a disease of one Zang organ, yet one treats another organ. The medication appears plain, with no single herb obviously targeting the Liver, yet the Liver disease is cured. If you desperately try to pacify the Liver and extinguish wind, using formulas like Lingyang Gouteng Tang (Antelope Horn and Uncaria Decoction) or Longdan Xiegan Tang (Gentian Liver-Draining Decoction), treating repeatedly yields no effect. Why? Because you haven't truly understood. You only know "to cure the disease, add the formula," and you only know "all wind tremors/dizziness belong to the Liver," but you don't know "if signs are present, seek them; if absent, seek them; if excess, hold accountable; if deficiency, hold accountable," nor do you know the principle of "first determine the five-fold overcoming relationships," nor do you know "seeing Liver disease, knowing it transmits to the Spleen, one should first strengthen the Spleen." Consequently, you are merely "waiting by a stump for a rabbit" (acting foolishly/stagnantly) and ending up as an incompetent practitioner. Therefore, although there are many variations within pathogenesis, the essence remains unchanged. Utilizing the principles provided by *Da Yao*, searching around this "essence," you will surely find the crux of the disease. Here I only provide the general line of thought, hoping everyone will research along this path and apply it clinically. Above, I discussed the "Nineteen Pathogeneses" and briefly introduced the basics of Yunqi (Five Movements and Six Qi). I believe this insight is quite deep. Now that Minor Snow has passed, what climatic characteristic do we feel? It is very humid; people feel lethargic, and many catch colds. This cold differs from previous ones. If one does not know the annual influences or understand Yunqi, treating such colds will likely encounter obstacles. Currently, Cold-Dampness is commanding, and Dampness is particularly heavy, resembling spring, which is the only season typically this humid. A few days ago, I treated three patients: one with a malignant tumor of the hard palate, one with sciatica, and one with stomach pain. I prescribed the same formula for all three: Wuji San (Five Accumulations Powder) from *Heji Jufang*. Except for the malignant tumor patient who could not take the medicine due to special circumstances, the other two cases had good results. Three different diseases treated with the same method is called "treating different diseases with the same method" (Yi Bing Tong Zhi). Actually, since the treatment is the same, there must be a common factor, and that factor is climatic characteristic (Qi Yi). Therefore, if climatic characteristics are grasped well, pathogenesis is easier to clarify; once pathogenesis is clear, treatment plans are easily formulated. This is indeed a very convenient method in clinical practice. The aforementioned malignant tumor patient was only 26 years old, looked pale and unhealthy, had few subjective symptoms, mainly head distension and slight cough (with lung metastasis). Palpation revealed a wiry and slippery pulse on the right, a choppy pulse at the Chi position, and a deep, fine pulse on the left that could not withstand pressure. The tongue was pale and dark with a white, slippery coating. How should we think about such a patient? Looking at the medications he previously took, they were large doses of Ban Zhilian (Scutellaria Barbatae Herba) and Bai Hua She She Cao (Hedyotis Diffusae Herba). So, my first suggestion was to stop these medications immediately. Ban Zhilian and Bai Hua She She Cao are heat-clearing herbs. If the tumor were truly caused by heat-toxin accumulation, their use would be unquestionable, producing anti-cancer effects. However, if the tumor is凝结 (coagulated/condensed) due to Cold-Dampness, as in this case, continuing to use heat-clearing herbs is equivalent to aiding the tyrant (doing harm). Upon encountering a cancer patient, if you immediately think of using Ban Zhilian for anti-cancer purposes, you are walking the path of "treating the disease name directly," acting like a Western doctor, not a TCM practitioner. TCM emphasizes pattern differentiation (Bian Zheng); only use the appropriate formula for the identified pattern. *Neijing* states: "Treat cold with heat, treat heat with cold." This is a principle that must be followed. If it is a cold-natured disease, warm-hot herbs should be used, regardless of whether it is a tumor or something else. The aforementioned patient first manifested in 1994. 1994 was the year of Jia Xu. Jia indicates excessive Earth movement; Xu indicates Taiyang Cold Water ruling the Heaven (Si Tian) and Taiyin Damp Earth ruling the Earth (Zai Quan). For such a tumor patient, it is difficult to specify the exact day of onset; the boundary of onset cannot be defined by days as easily as with a cold. Therefore, the framework of the year becomes extremely important. We know that the "annual influence and climatic abundance/deficiency" of 1994 was primarily dominated by Cold-Dampness, especially Dampness. Why did this disease not manifest in 1993? Perhaps the cancer was incubating in 1993. Why did it have to erupt in 1994? It is certain that the annual movement of 1994, with its changes in the Six Qi, greatly facilitated the onset of this tumor, serving as a contributing factor for its eruption. Thus, it triggered in such a special annual movement. Looking at this year, it is the year of Geng Chen. Si Tian and Zai Quan are again Cold Water and Damp Earth. This gives us a hint: this disease is related to Cold-Dampness. This indicates that such Cold-Dampness climate is certainly unfavorable to his internal environment and immune system, while conversely, it is helpful to the tumor. Think about it, is this "annual influence" important? Indeed, it is very important. If combined with tongue and pulse observations, which correspond to this, the pathogenesis is confirmed. Therefore, regardless of what the disease is called, treat it according to Cold and Dampness. Remove factors favorable to the tumor and unfavorable to the body. Even if it doesn't improve, at least it won't aid the pathology. At the beginning of discussing pathogenesis, Huangdi raised this question: "The generation of hundreds of diseases all arises from Wind, Cold, Summer-Heat, Dampness, Dryness, and Fire, through their transformation and variation." Here, "hundreds of diseases" refers to numerous illnesses all affected by these factors; tumors are no exception. Whether tumors or other diseases, all are influenced by this macro-environment and the comprehensive factors of the Six Qi. Once you understand this factor and attempt to block or change it, it will obviously have a beneficial impact on the disease's outcome. From this perspective, why say Wuji San cannot fight cancer? Wuji San can fight cancer! However, do not use it for projects or experiments; the results might be negative. Many people would then lose faith in TCM, saying it is unscientific, not universal, and not reproducible. Actually, it is not that TCM lacks universality or reproducibility, but rather that your approach makes reproduction impossible. Wuji San targets the factor of Cold-Dampness; for Cold-Dampness, Wuji San is universal and reproducible. If you use it against other factors, how can it be universal or reproducible? Just as antibiotics are only universal against bacteria, can you expect them to be universal against viruses? Is that possible? Yet, this is the current situation in TCM research: using antibiotics to treat viruses, failing, and then blaming the antibiotics. Blaming others for one's own mistakes—what logic is there in this? Now, looking at journals, the most common type of article uses a certain formula or method to treat a certain disease in a certain number of cases. The sample size cannot be small, otherwise statistical processing is impossible. Honestly, in clinical practice, how often do we encounter the same disease caused by identical factors? Rarely. What to do then? Force unrelated things together. Such practices and research attitudes are truly worrying. Our research departments and journals' policies have fueled this unhealthy trend. Pathogenesis is a major discipline in TCM. Previously, we only briefly mentioned "all wind tremors/dizziness belong to the Liver." What about "all pain, itching, and sores belong to the Heart," "all dampness, swelling, and fullness belong to the Spleen," and "all sudden stiffness belong to Wind"? These are the same. Everyone can analyze them clause by clause using the same method. Since the premise is fixed, taking this premise as the center and searching around it according to the aforementioned principles will surely yield evidence. Once you memorize the "Nineteen Pathogeneses" and the search methods thoroughly, you will handle treatments effortlessly.
3. Grasping the Main Syndrome, Recognizing Pathogenesis
How to observe pathogenesis in clinical practice? The aspects mentioned above are very important; these are classic teachings. Another aspect is "grasping the main syndrome" (Zhua Zhu Zheng), proposed by Professor Liu Duzhou. Old Liu is an authority in the field of *Shanghan Lun*, known as "North Liu, South Chen." "North Liu" refers to Liu Duzhou, and "South Chen" refers to my supervisor, Professor Chen Yiren. Professor Liu Duzhou wrote a book titled *Fourteen Lectures on Shanghan Lun*. Although the book is not long, it covers Old Liu's experiences. The final lecture addresses the issue of grasping the main syndrome. Old Liu believed that grasping the main syndrome reflects the highest level of pattern differentiation and treatment. Therefore, the ability to grasp the main syndrome becomes a key issue in clinical practice. Why is grasping the main syndrome so important? My understanding has two points. First, the main syndrome best reflects the essential mechanism of disease causation, i.e., it best reflects pathogenesis; only a syndrome that reflects pathogenesis can be called the main syndrome. Second, the main syndrome is most likely to reflect the pathway for eliminating the disease, suggesting whether you should use sweating, purging, vomiting, or other methods. Such main syndromes often play a decisive role; based on this syndrome, you can identify the direction to proceed. The main syndrome should possess these two basic characteristics. Why raise this issue in *Fourteen Lectures on Shanghan Lun*? Obviously, in Zhang Zhongjing's clauses, many of the described syndromes are main syndromes. His clauses are often very simple, such as Clause 155: "Epigastric fullness/stuffiness accompanied by aversion to cold and sweating is treated with Fuzi Xie Xin Tang." Clause 301: "Shaoyin disease, newly acquired, presenting with unusual aversion to heat and a deep pulse is treated with Mahuang Xixin Fuzi Tang." In other words, the clauses of *Shanghan Lun* essentially run through the issue of main syndromes.