人赖脾胃为养生之本,则在乎健与不健耳。而健脾三方,如洁古之枳术丸,东垣之平胃
散及补中益气汤,俱当今之相传以为准绳者也。夫所谓平胃者,欲平治其不平也,此东垣为
胃强邪实者设,故其性味从辛、从燥、从苦,而能消、能散,惟有滞、有湿、有积者宜之。
今见方家,每以此为常服健脾之剂,动辄用之,而不察可否,其误甚矣。
一、洁古枳术丸,以白术为君,脾得其燥,所以能健,然佐以枳实,其味苦峻,有推墙
倒壁之功,此实寓攻于守之剂,惟脾气不清而滞胜者,正当用之,若脾气已虚,非所宜也,
今人不察,相传为补脾之药,而朝吞暮饵,或以小儿瘦弱而制令常服,则适足以伤其气助其
瘦耳,用宜酌也。
一、补中益气汤,乃东垣独得之心法。盖以脾胃属土,为水谷之海,凡五脏生成,惟此
是赖者,在赖其发生之气运而上行,故由胃达脾,由脾达肺,而生长万物,滋溉一身。即如
天地之土,其气皆然。凡春夏之土,能生能长者,以得阳气而上升,升则向生也。秋冬之土
,不生不长者,以得阴气而下降,降则向死也。今本方以升柴助生气,以参、 、归、术助
阳气,此东垣立方之意,诚尽善矣。第肺本象天,脾本象地,地天既交,所以成泰。然不知
泰之前犹有临,临之前犹有复,此实三阳之元始,故余再制补阴益气煎,正所以助临复之气
,庶乎得根本之道,而足补东垣之未尽也。又补中益气汤之用,原为补中扶阳而设,然补阳
之义,则亦有宜否之辨,用者不可不知。如东垣用此以治劳倦内伤发热等证,虽曰为助阳也
,非发汗也,然实有不散而散之意,故于劳倦感寒,或阳虚咳疟,及脾气下陷等证,则
最所宜也。若全无表邪寒热,而但有中气亏甚者,则升柴之类大非所宜。何也?盖升柴之味
皆兼苦寒,升柴之性皆专疏散,虽曰升麻入脾胃,柴胡入肝胆,能引清气上升,然惟有邪者
,固可因升而散之,使或无邪,能不因散而愈耗其中气乎。即曰此汤以补剂为主,而惟藉升
柴以引达清气,不知微虚者犹可出入,大虚者必难假借,当此之时,即纯用培补犹恐不及,
而再兼疏泄,安望成功?且凡属补阳之剂,无不能升,正以阳主升也,用其升而不用其散,
斯得补阳之大法,此中自有玄机,又奚必升柴之是赖乎。故寇宗 极言五劳七伤之大忌柴胡
者,是诚绝类之真见,而李时珍复又非之,余亦何容再辨哉。然理有一定,孰能越之?兹余
单揭其要,曰∶能散者断不能聚,能泄者断不能补,而性味之苦寒者,亦断非扶阳之物。只
此便是断按,而纷纷之议,或可判矣。
故于诸证之中,凡其不宜用此者,则有不可不察。如表不固而汗不敛者,不可用。外无
表邪而阴虚发热者,不可用。阳气无根而格阳戴阳者,不可用。脾肺虚甚而气促似喘者,不
可用。命门火衰而虚寒泄泻者,不可用。水亏火亢而吐血衄血者,不可用。四肢厥逆而阳虚
欲脱者,不可用。总之,元气虚极者,毫不可泄,阴阳下竭者,毫不可升,真火亏败者,毫
不可用清凉。今人但知补中益气汤可以补虚,一概尚之,而不知病当紧急,则此时几微关系
,判于一举指之间,而纤微不可紊误者,正此类也,余亦安能以笔尽哉。
Human health relies on the Spleen and Stomach as the foundation of nourishment, which depends entirely on whether they are strong or weak. Among the three formulas for strengthening the Spleen, such as Zhizhu Wan (Bitter Orange and Atractylodes Macrocephala Pill) by Zhang Jiegou, Pingwei San (Stomach-Pacifying Powder) and Buzhong Yiqi Tang (Tonify the Middle and Augment the Qi Decoction) by Li Dongyuan, all are currently passed down as standards. The term "Pingwei" (Stomach-Pacifying) implies restoring balance to an imbalanced state; this was formulated by Li Dongyuan for conditions of excess Stomach heat and pathogenic fullness. Therefore, its properties are pungent, dry, and bitter, capable of resolving stagnation and dispersing pathogens, making it suitable only for cases with stagnation, dampness, and accumulation. However, I observe that many physicians today treat this as a daily tonic for strengthening the Spleen, using it indiscriminately without examining suitability, which is a grave error.
First, Zhizhu Wan by Zhang Jiegou uses Baizhu (Atractylodis Macrocephalae Rhizoma) as the sovereign herb. The Spleen benefits from Baizhu's drying property, thus achieving strength. However, it is assisted by Zhishi (Immature Bitter Orange), which has a bitter and harsh nature, possessing the power to demolish walls (break qi stagnation). This is actually a formula that incorporates attack within defense, suitable only when Spleen qi is unclear and stagnation prevails. If Spleen qi is already deficient, it is inappropriate. Today, people fail to examine this, mistakenly believing it to be a Spleen-tonifying medicine, taking it morning and night, or prescribing it regularly for thin and weak children. This merely damages their qi and exacerbates their emaciation. Medication should be used with discretion.
Second, Buzhong Yiqi Tang (Tonify the Middle and Augment the Qi Decoction) is Li Dongyuan's unique insight. Since the Spleen and Stomach belong to Earth and serve as the sea of water and grain, the generation of the five Zang organs relies upon them. This reliance is on the ascending movement of generative qi, flowing from the Stomach to the Spleen, and from the Spleen to the Lungs, thereby nurturing all things and moistening the entire body. This mirrors the earth in heaven and earth: in spring and summer, earth generates and grows because it receives yang qi and ascends; ascent leads to life. In autumn and winter, earth does not generate or grow because it receives yin qi and descends; descent leads to death. The present formula uses Shengma (Cimicifugae Rhizoma) and Chaihu (Bupleuri Radix) to assist generative qi, and Renshen (Ginseng Radix), Huangqi (Astragali Membranacei Radix), Danggui (Angelicae Sinensis Radix), and Baizhu (Atractylodis Macrocephalae Rhizoma) to assist yang qi. This intention behind Li Dongyuan's prescription is indeed perfect. However, while the Lung corresponds to Heaven and the Spleen to Earth, and their interaction creates the hexagram Tai (Peace), one must understand that before Tai comes Lin (Approach), and before Lin comes Fu (Return). These represent the origin of the three yang qi. Therefore, I formulated Buyin Yiqi Jian (Decoction to Tonify Yin and Augment Qi) to assist the qi of Lin and Fu, hoping to grasp the root principle and supplement what Li Dongyuan left incomplete. Furthermore, the use of Buzhong Yiqi Tang was originally designed to tonify the middle and support yang. However, there is a distinction regarding the appropriateness of supporting yang, which users must know. For instance, Li Dongyuan used this to treat fever due to fatigue and internal injury. Although described as supporting yang rather than inducing sweating, it inherently contains a dispersing action. Thus, it is most suitable for cold contracted due to fatigue, cough or malaria due to yang deficiency, and sinking of Spleen qi. However, if there is no exterior pathogen or chills/fever, but only severe deficiency of Middle qi, then Shengma and Chaihu are highly inappropriate. Why? Because both Shengma and Chaihu possess bitter-cold flavors and specific dispersing natures. Although Shengma enters the Spleen and Stomach meridians and Chaihu enters the Liver and Gallbladder meridians, guiding clear qi upward, only when pathogens exist can they be dispersed via ascent. Without pathogens, will they not further deplete Middle qi through dispersion? Even if this decoction is primarily a tonic relying on Shengma and Chaihu to guide clear qi, slight deficiency may tolerate this, but severe deficiency cannot borrow from it. At such times, even pure tonification might be insufficient; adding dispersing herbs makes success unlikely. Moreover, all yang-tonifying agents have ascending properties because yang governs ascent. Using the ascending quality without the dispersing quality is the great method of tonifying yang, containing profound mysteries, so why rely solely on Shengma and Chaihu? Therefore, Kou Zongshi's strong warning against using Chaihu for the five labors and seven injuries is truly insightful, even though Li Shizhen refuted it. What need is there for me to argue further? Principles are fixed; who can transcend them? I hereby highlight the key point: what disperses cannot gather; what drains cannot tonify; and bitter-cold substances certainly do not support yang. This alone serves as definitive proof, allowing the chaotic debates to be settled.
Therefore, among various syndromes, those unsuitable for this formula must be carefully examined. It is contraindicated for insecure exterior with unconsolidated sweating. It is contraindicated for yin-deficiency fever without exterior pathogens. It is contraindicated for floating yang due to rootless yang (false heat signs like Daiyang). It is contraindicated for extreme Spleen-Lung deficiency with shortness of breath resembling asthma. It is contraindicated for deficiency-cold diarrhea due to Mingmen fire decline. It is contraindicated for hematemesis and epistaxis due to water deficiency and hyperactive fire. It is contraindicated for cold limbs and impending yang collapse due to yang deficiency. In summary, for extremely deficient yuan qi, nothing should be drained; for exhaustion of yin and yang below, nothing should be ascended; for failure of true fire, cooling agents must absolutely not be used. People today only know that Buzhong Yiqi Tang can tonify deficiency and universally revere it, unaware that in urgent conditions, critical distinctions are made in an instant, where minute errors are unacceptable. Such cases are precisely of this nature, and how could I possibly exhaustively describe them in writing?