麻黄汤(散一) 桂枝汤(散九) 麻桂饮(新散七) 愈风汤(散五六) 排风汤(散百五)
五积散(散三九) 续命汤(散五一) 小续命汤(散五二) 大续命汤(散五三) 大秦艽汤(和
二四五)
二丹丸(补一五六 养阴血) 黄 丸(补一五五 虚风) 八风散(和二百四十 风邪上
盛) 省风汤(和二三九 风痰) 清心散(和二四九 风痰) 琥珀寿星丸(和百十三 风痰)
涤痰汤(和二四八 风痰) 四白丹(和二五四 清气消风) 顺风匀气散(和二四二 行气
疏风) 薏苡仁汤(和二四七 中风流注) 虎骨散(和二百五十 半身不遂) 防风通圣散(攻
十六 风热便结) 三化汤(攻二九 邪实中焦) 胃风汤(散五七 虚风面肿) 秦艽升麻汤(
散五五 阳明中风) 地黄散(散五八 阴虚中风) 续命煮散(散五四 补虚散风) 十味锉
散(热四九 血弱身痛) 养正丹(热一八九 痰涎上壅) 养血当归地黄汤(和二四六 血
少拘挛)
非风一证,实时人所谓中风证也。此证多见卒倒,卒倒多由昏愦。本皆内伤积损颓败而
然,原非外感风寒所致。而古今相传,咸以中风名之,其误甚矣。故余欲易去中风二字,而
拟名类风,又欲拟名属风。然类风、属风,仍与风字相近,恐后人不解,仍尔模糊,故单用
河间、东垣之意,竟以非风名之。庶乎使人易晓,而知其本非风证矣。
一、凡诊诸病,必先宜正名。观《内经》诸篇所言风证,各有浅深脏腑虚实寒热之不同
,前义已详,本皆历历可考也。若今人之所谓中风者,则以《内经》之厥逆,悉指为风矣,
延误至今,莫有辨者。虽丹溪云∶今世所谓风病,大率与痿证混同论治,此说固亦有之。然
何不云误以厥逆为风也。惟近代徐东皋有云∶ 厥类风,凡尸厥、痰厥、气厥、血厥、
酒厥等证,皆与中风相类。此言若乎近之,而殊亦未善也。使果风厥相类,则凡临是证者,
曰风可也,曰厥亦可也,疑似未决,将从风乎?将从厥乎?不知《经》所言者,风自风,厥自
厥也。风之与厥,一表证也,一里证也。岂得谓之相类耶?奈何后人不能详察经义,而悉以
厥证为风。既名为风,安得不从风治。既从风治,安得不用散风之药。以风药而散厥证,所
散者非元气乎?因致真阴愈伤,真气愈失,是速其死矣。若知为厥,则原非外感,自与风字
无涉,此名之不可不正,证之不可不辨也。但名得其正,又何至有误治之患。诸厥证义详后
厥逆本门,当与此门通阅。
Ma Huang Tang (San, Formula No. 1) Gui Zhi Tang (San, Formula No. 9) Ma Gui Yin (Xin San, Formula No. 7) Yu Feng Tang (San, Formula No. 56) Pai Feng Tang (San, Formula No. 105)
Wu Ji San (San, Formula No. 39) Xu Ming Tang (San, Formula No. 51) Xiao Xu Ming Tang (San, Formula No. 52) Da Xu Ming Tang (San, Formula No. 53) Da Qin Jiao Tang (He, Formula No. 245)
Er Dan Wan (Bu, Formula No. 156; Nourishing Yin and Blood) Di Huang Wan (Bu, Formula No. 155; Deficient Wind) Ba Feng San (He, Formula No. 240; Excess Wind Pathogen Rising Up) Sheng Feng Tang (He, Formula No. 239; Wind-Phlegm) Qing Xin San (He, Formula No. 249; Wind-Phlegm) Hu Po Shou Xing Wan (He, Formula No. 113; Wind-Phlegm)
Di Tan Tang (He, Formula No. 248; Wind-Phlegm) Si Bai Dan (He, Formula No. 254; Clearing Qi and Dispelling Wind) Shun Feng Yun Qi San (He, Formula No. 242; Moving Qi and Dispersing Wind) Yi Yi Ren Tang (He, Formula No. 247; Stroke with Flowing Obstruction) Hu Gu San (He, Formula No. 250; Hemiplegia) Fang Feng Tong Sheng San (Gong, Formula No. 16; Wind-Heat with Constipation) San Hua Tang (Gong, Formula No. 29; Pathogenic Excess in the Middle Jiao) Wei Feng Tang (San, Formula No. 57; Deficient Wind with Facial Edema) Qin Jiao Sheng Ma Tang (San, Formula No. 55; Yangming Wind Strike) Di Huang San (San, Formula No. 58; Yin Deficiency Wind Strike) Xu Ming Zhu San (San, Formula No. 54; Tonifying Deficiency and Dispersing Wind) Shi Wei Cuo San (Re, Formula No. 49; Blood Deficiency with Body Pain) Yang Zheng Dan (Re, Formula No. 189; Phlegm-Saliva Rising Up) Yang Xue Dang Gui Di Huang Tang (He, Formula No. 246; Blood Scarcity with Cramping)
The syndrome of "Fei Feng" (Non-Wind) is what people at present call the syndrome of "Zhong Feng" (Wind Strike). This syndrome often presents with sudden collapse; sudden collapse is mostly due to loss of consciousness and mental confusion. Its root cause lies in internal injury leading to accumulated depletion and physical decline, and originally it is not caused by external contraction of wind-cold. However, through transmission from ancient times to the present, everyone has named it Zhong Feng (Wind Strike), which is a great error. Therefore, I wish to remove the term Zhong Feng (Wind Strike) and propose naming it Lei Feng (Resembling Wind), or even Shu Feng (Belonging to Wind). Yet, both Lei Feng (Resembling Wind) and Shu Feng (Belonging to Wind) are still close to the character Feng (Wind), fearing that later generations will not understand and remain confused. Thus, adopting solely the intent of Liu He Jian (Liu Wansu) and Li Dong Yuan (Li Gao), I simply name it Fei Feng (Non-Wind). This may make it easier for people to comprehend and realize that it is fundamentally not a Wind syndrome.
First, in diagnosing any disease, one must first correct the nomenclature. Observing the various discussions on Wind syndromes in the chapters of Nei Jing (Inner Canon of the Yellow Emperor), there are differences in depth, organ involvement, deficiency/excess, and cold/heat. The previous arguments have detailed this, and these points are clearly verifiable. If we consider what contemporary people call Zhong Feng (Wind Strike), they mistakenly identify all cases of Jue Ni (Jue Syndrome/Collapse) described in Nei Jing (Inner Canon of the Yellow Emperor) as Wind. This error has persisted until today without anyone distinguishing them. Although Dan Xi (Zhu Zhenheng) stated: "The so-called Wind diseases in the current world are largely treated similarly to Wei Zheng (Atrophy Syndromes)," this view has its merits. However, why not say that it is an error to mistake Jue Ni (Jue Syndrome/Collapse) for Wind? Only recently, Xu Dong Gao (Xu Ke) said: "Jue Syndromes resemble Wind syndromes; all conditions such as Shi Jue (Corpse-like Collapse), Tan Jue (Phlegm Collapse), Qi Jue (Qi Collapse), Xue Jue (Blood Collapse), and Jiu Jue (Alcohol Collapse) are similar to Zhong Feng (Wind Strike)." This statement seems plausible but is not entirely sound. If Wind and Jue were truly similar, then whenever encountering such a syndrome, one could call it Wind or Jue. With uncertainty remaining, would one follow Wind treatment or Jue treatment? One should know that what the Classics refer to, Wind is Wind, and Jue is Jue. Wind is a exterior syndrome, while Jue is an interior syndrome. How can they be called similar? Why do later generations fail to carefully examine the meaning of the Classics and treat all Jue syndromes as Wind? Since it is named Wind, how can one not treat it according to Wind principles? Since treating according to Wind principles, how can one avoid using Wind-dispelling herbs? Using Wind-dispelling herbs to treat Jue syndromes dissipates not the pathogen, but the Yuan Qi (Primary Qi)? Consequently, the True Yin is further injured, and the True Qi is further lost, thereby hastening death. If one recognizes it as Jue, it is originally not an external contraction, and thus has no relation to the concept of Wind. This illustrates why nomenclature must be corrected and syndromes must be distinguished. Once the name is correct, how could there be the danger of mis-treatment? The principles of various Jue syndromes are detailed in the subsequent section on Jue Ni (Jue Syndrome/Collapse); this section should be read in conjunction with that section.