杜仲,味辛、甘,气平温,降也,阳也,无毒。入肾经,补中强志,益肾添精,尤治腰
痛不
能屈伸者神效,亦能治足、阴囊湿痒,止小水梦遗。此物可以为君,而又善为臣使,但嫌过
燥,与熟地同用,则燥湿相宜,自然无火动之忧也。
或问肾恶燥,而杜仲性燥,何以入肾以健腰?吾子加熟地尤宜,然亦似熟地之滋肾,终
非杜
仲之益肾矣。曰∶补肾原不必熟地,余用熟地者,不过取其相得益彰也。夫肾虽恶燥,而湿
气侵之,腰即重着而不可俯仰,是肾又未尝不恶湿也。杜仲性燥,燥肾中之邪水,而非烁肾
中之真水也。去熟地而肾中之燥不相妨,用熟地而肾中之湿亦无碍,盖杜仲自能补肾,而非
借重于熟地之助也。
或问杜仲非燥药也,而吾子谓是燥药,何据而云然乎?曰∶论杜仲之有丝,其非燥药也。
然
而杜仲之燥,正有有丝之不肯断。夫太刚则折,大柔则不肯折矣。杜仲之丝,经火炒则断,
其中之柔软为何如,而独谓其性燥者,别有义也。杜仲不经
火则湿,经火则燥。不断之丝,非火炒至无丝,则不可为未非受火气迫急而为燥乎。肾
恶燥。而
以燥投燥,遽入往往动火,我所以教人与熟地同用也。至于肾经中湿,不特宜同熟地并施,
且宜生用为妙,并不可火炒。盖肾既有湿,得熟地则增润,反牵制杜仲。一加火,则失其本
性,但补而不攻,而湿邪反不得遽散。夫杜仲不炒则湿,何反宜于治湿。盖杜仲燥中有湿,
湿非水气之谓也。邪湿得真水而化,生用,正存其真气耳。
或问杜仲补肾,仲景公何故不采入八味丸中?不知杜仲补肾中之火,而有动肾气,动则
桂、
附不安于肾宫,恐有飞越之虞,故用桂、附,而不用杜仲。然则固不可用乎,肾中有湿气,
正宜加用于八味丸中,取其动而能散湿也,又不可拘执不用而尽弃之耳。
或问杜仲补肾,世人竟以破故纸佐之,毋乃太燥乎?杜仲得破故纸,而其功始大,古人
嫌其
太燥,益胡桃仁润之,有鱼水之喻。其实,杜仲得破故纸,正不必胡桃仁之润也。盖破故纸
温补命门之火,而杜仲则滋益肾中之水,水火有既济之美,又何必胡桃仁之润哉。虽杜仲得
胡桃仁之相助,亦无碍其益肾之功。然而,杜仲实无借于胡桃仁也。或云胡桃仁滋破故纸之
燥也。夫破故纸用之于他药之中,未见用胡桃仁之助,何独入于杜仲之中而加胡桃仁也。谓
非因杜仲而入之,吾不信也。
Eucommia ulmoides (Duzhong), with pungent and sweet flavors, has a neutral and warm nature, possesses descending properties, belongs to Yang, and is non-toxic. It enters the Kidney Meridian, tonifies the middle jiao, strengthens willpower, benefits the Kidney, and replenishes essence. It is particularly effective for lower back pain accompanied by inability to flex or extend, and can also treat dampness and itching of the feet and scrotum, as well as stop frequent urination and nocturnal emission. This herb can serve as the sovereign drug (Jun Yao) and is also adept at serving as an attendant drug (Chen Shi). However, it is somewhat drying; when used together with Prepared Rehmannia Root (Shudi), the dryness and dampness are balanced, naturally avoiding the worry of stirring up internal heat.
One might ask: The Kidney dislikes dryness, yet Eucommia is drying in nature; how can it enter the Kidney to strengthen the waist? I suggest adding Prepared Rehmannia Root, which is more suitable, but this seems to make Prepared Rehmannia Root nourish the Kidney, rather than Eucommia benefiting the Kidney directly. The response is: Tonifying the Kidney does not necessarily require Prepared Rehmannia Root. I use Prepared Rehmannia Root merely to achieve a synergistic effect. Although the Kidney dislikes dryness, if dampness invades the Kidney, the waist becomes heavy and unable to bend or straighten, indicating that the Kidney also dislikes dampness. Eucommia's drying nature dries out pathogenic water in the Kidney, rather than scorching the true Yin fluids of the Kidney. Removing Prepared Rehmannia Root does not hinder the treatment of dryness in the Kidney, and using Prepared Rehmannia Root does not obstruct dampness in the Kidney, because Eucommia can tonify the Kidney on its own, without relying on the assistance of Prepared Rehmannia Root.
One might ask: Eucommia is not a drying herb, yet you claim it is. What is your basis? I reply: Regarding the fibrous strands of Eucommia, it is indeed not a drying herb. However, the "dryness" of Eucommia lies precisely in the resistance of these strands to breaking. Things that are too rigid break easily, while things that are too soft do not break. The fibers of Eucommia break when stir-fried with fire; given their inherent softness, why single out its nature as drying? There is another meaning. Eucommia is damp when unprocessed and becomes dry after stir-frying. Those unbroken fibers, unless stir-fried until they no longer exist, must have been forced into dryness by the heat. Since the Kidney dislikes dryness, administering a drying herb often stirs up fire, which is why I teach people to use it with Prepared Rehmannia Root. As for dampness in the Kidney Meridian, it is not only suitable to be used with Prepared Rehmannia Root, but raw usage is best, and stir-frying should be avoided. If the Kidney already has dampness, adding Prepared Rehmannia Root increases moisture, which counteracts Eucommia. Once stir-fried, it loses its original nature, becoming purely tonifying without dispelling, so the damp pathogen cannot be scattered quickly. Why is Eucommia, which is damp when unroasted, suitable for treating dampness? This is because Eucommia contains both dryness and dampness; here, "damp" does not refer to water qi. Pathogenic dampness transforms upon contact with true water; using it raw preserves its true qi.
One might ask: Eucommia tonifies the Kidney, yet why did Zhang Zhongjing not include it in the Eight-Ingredient Pill with Rehmannia (Ba Wei Wan)? It is unknown whether Eucommia tonifies the fire in the Kidney but disturbs Kidney Qi. If Kidney Qi is disturbed, Cinnamon Twig (Guizhi) and Aconite Root (Fuzi) cannot remain stable in the Kidney palace, fearing the risk of floating away. Therefore, Cinnamon Twig and Aconite Root are used instead of Eucommia. Does this mean Eucommia is absolutely unusable? If there is dampness in the Kidney, it is appropriate to add Eucommia to the Eight-Ingredient Pill, taking advantage of its ability to move and scatter dampness. One should not stubbornly refuse to use it and discard it entirely.
One might ask: Eucommia tonifies the Kidney, yet people commonly use Psoralea Fruit (Pogu Zhi / Buguzhi) to assist it. Is this not too drying? Eucommia achieves great efficacy when combined with Psoralea Fruit. Ancients disliked its excessive dryness and added Walnut Kernel (Hetao Ren) to moisten it, likening the relationship to fish and water. In reality, when Eucommia is combined with Psoralea Fruit, there is no need for Walnut Kernel to moisten. Psoralea Fruit warms and tonifies the Fire of the Gate of Vitality (Ming Men), while Eucommia nourishes and benefits the Water of the Kidney. This creates the beauty of Water and Fire interacting harmoniously (Ji Ji); why is Walnut Kernel's moistening necessary? Although Eucommia benefits from the assistance of Walnut Kernel, it does not hinder its Kidney-tonifying function. However, Eucommia essentially does not rely on Walnut Kernel. Some say Walnut Kernel moistens the dryness of Psoralea Fruit. When Psoralea Fruit is used with other herbs, there is no seen need for Walnut Kernel's assistance. Why is Walnut Kernel added specifically when used with Eucommia? If it were not because of Eucommia, I would not believe it.