夫医犹理也,医之有疡医,犹理之有兵也。善为理者,正其五官,齐其百司,使纪纲法
度,
非理之所尚也,将藉之以除乱也。彼其平居无事之时,而吾所以弭乱之本,既已缜密完固,
而无所疏漏,一旦有急则除之而已耳。故兵虽试而国家之元气不亏,医之为道也亦然。方其
病在腠理也,汤液之所及也。其在肠胃也,湔浣之所及也。若夫隆然皮肤之间,甚至不可名
状者,彼何为哉,其能不攻刺乎!其能不搏击乎!顾攻有守而后攻,击有备而后击。苟不谛
其
癣之疾,将不为腹心之患者几希,噫,可不慎乎。故明于理者,可与语医也。已世之以疡名
家者多矣,然孰有如我立斋先生者耶。盖先生以岐黄世业,旁通诸家,微词颐旨,靡不究竟
。其言以为不知外科者,无以通经络之原委。不精《内经》者,无以究阴阳之变合。内外殊
科,其揆一也。故其视病不问大小,必以治本为第一义。无急效,无近期,纾徐从容,不劳
而病自愈。间出《疠疡机要》一编,属其友沈生梓之以传。沈生读之,大率以己意而订古方
,以医案而验治效,以调补为守备之完策,以解利为攻击之权宜。盖不出乎庙堂之讦谟,而
坐得夫催陷廓清之术。假令业医者而执是焉,既不病于滞而不通,又不病于肤而无本,奚至
攻其所习,而毁所不见耶。噫!若先生者可谓医而通于理者矣。是录也,顾不可传哉。或者
曰∶诚若所言,则内外医分门异业者非欤。周官有疾医、疡医二职,并存何也?曰∶非是之
谓也。昔秦越人之为医也,闻秦贵小儿则小儿医,赵贵妇人则带下医,周贵老人则耳目痹医
。一医而三习,非其术诚奇幻,理固不殊也。若周官所存,则以其职言耳,岂知后世判为两
途,绝不相通者哉。古之任官,居则为命卿,而出则为命将。夫一人也,而理与兵兼焉,孰
谓内外医果不相通者哉。
嘉靖岁甲寅中秋,秀州沈启原道卿甫着。
Medicine is akin to governance; just as the state has military forces, medicine has surgeons. A skilled governor rectifies the officials and unifies the departments, ensuring that laws and regulations are not merely advocated through administrative means but utilized to quell disorder. When there is no unrest in times of peace, the fundamental measures we employ to prevent chaos are already meticulous, complete, and solid, leaving no loopholes. Thus, when emergencies arise, they are simply eradicated. Consequently, although the army undergoes drills, the vital energy (Yuan Qi) of the nation remains undiminished; the principle of medicine is the same. When a disease resides in the *Couli* (the interstitial spaces between skin and muscle), decoctions can reach it. When it resides in the stomach and intestines, purgative washings can reach it. But what of those conditions manifesting as protrusions on the skin, or even those too complex to describe? How else could they be treated but by piercing and striking (aggressive surgical intervention)? However, an attack must be backed by defense, and a strike must be prepared for. If one does not carefully examine minor ailments like tinea, they may easily become critical internal threats. Alas, how can one not be cautious? Therefore, only those who understand governance can discuss medicine with.
Many have excelled in surgery in recent times, yet none compare to my Master Lizhai. His family has practiced the arts of Qibo and Huangdi for generations, and he has mastered various schools of thought, thoroughly comprehending their subtle principles. He stated that without knowledge of surgery, one cannot understand the origins and details of meridians; without mastery of the *Neijing* (Inner Canon of the Yellow Emperor), one cannot investigate the variations and combinations of Yin and Yang. Although internal and external medicine differ in discipline, their underlying principles are identical. Thus, in treating diseases regardless of size, he prioritized addressing the root cause above all else. He sought neither rapid effects nor short-term results, acting with calmness and leisure, allowing the illness to heal spontaneously without excessive exertion.
He occasionally presented the compilation *Liyang Jiyao* (Essential Secrets of Leprosy and Ulcers), entrusting his friend, Mr. Shen, to print and disseminate it. Upon reading it, Mr. Shen generally corrected ancient formulas according to his own insights, verified treatment efficacy using medical cases, employed tonification and regulation as comprehensive defensive strategies, and used draining and resolving methods as expedient aggressive tactics. This approach remained within the realm of strategic planning, achieving the effect of clearing out pathogens without effort. If practitioners adhered to this, they would avoid stagnation and lack of flow, as well as superficiality and lack of foundation. They would not attack what they know while disparaging what they do not see. Alas, Master such as him can truly be said to be physicians who understand governance. Is this record not worthy of transmission?
Some might ask: "If this is true, are internal and external medicine not distinct professions? The *Rites of Zhou* lists both *Jiyi* (Physicians for Internal Diseases) and *Yangyi* (Surgeons). Why were both positions retained?" I reply: That is not what I mean. In ancient times, Bian Que, when practicing medicine, served as a pediatrician in Qin where children were valued, a gynecologist in Zhao where women were valued, and a physician for ear, eye, and bi syndrome in Zhou where the elderly were valued. One physician mastering three specialties did not imply his techniques were miraculously different, but that the underlying principles were uniform. The distinction in the *Rites of Zhou* was based on official duties, not a separation into two incompatible paths as seen in later eras. Ancient officials served as high ministers at home and generals abroad; the same person embodied both governance and military command. Who says internal and external medicine are indeed disconnected?
Written by Shen Qiyuan, Daoqing, of Xiuzhou, during the Mid-Autumn Festival of the Jiayin year of the Jiajing reign.