凡古人载籍,所以垂训者,不知几经筹画,几经笔削,乃着之于书。后人竟以一览不明,便置之高阁,毋乃有负古
圣贤作书者之心乎?余尝博览遗言,若其有得于心,固然不忍释手,即令有疑于己,亦且数四低徊,然后得一夕豁然洞
灼而大悟也。有如方书所载∶“诸痛脉伏不可诊也”之句。余尝疑之,若以为治病之道,求所以辨明虚实寒热之法,斟
酌轻重缓急之宜,惟脉是恃。若脉伏既不可诊,医者将何以断其病之属虚属实、属寒属热之所致,而于用药之际,更有
可轻可重,当缓当急之定论乎?讵意古人之所以示我者,固有先得我心,而昭然笔之于书也。余是以一再思之,乃知所
谓脉伏不可诊者,若谓必须求他症以辨之,方有其治法焉尔。故余于诸痛脉伏者,固推而验于筋之青者紫者,识其为痧。
即于诸病不痛而脉伏者,亦必推而验于筋之青者紫者,识其为痧。盖缘痧毒瓦斯壅血阻于经络间,故脉有伏而不现尔,若
以针刺之,血流而气亦泄,毒始无所壅阻,而脉乃复其常尔。至于痧之重者,伤在肠胃三阴,针刺有所不到,血流有所
不尽,余惟从夫食积血痰所阻之毒以治之。脉且随药而复,则病有未愈者,始可凭脉以用其药,然后思古人之所谓不可
诊者,信乎诸痛脉伏之不可诊也。古人之诏我者,诚有所见也哉。
All ancient texts, intended to pass down teachings, underwent countless deliberations and revisions before being compiled into books. How can later generations, merely because they fail to understand them at a glance, dismiss them by placing them on high shelves? Is this not a betrayal of the sincere intentions of the ancient sages who authored these works?
I have extensively studied the surviving writings of the ancients. When I find insights that resonate with my mind, I naturally cannot bear to put them down. Even when doubts arise within me, I linger over them repeatedly until, one night, I experience a sudden enlightenment and profound comprehension.
Consider the statement found in medical formularies: "In cases of various pains, the pulse is deep-hidden (Fu Mai) and thus difficult to diagnose." I once harbored doubts about this. The method of treating disease relies on distinguishing between deficiency and excess, cold and heat, and weighing the severity and urgency of the condition, all of which depend heavily on pulse diagnosis. If a deep-hidden pulse renders diagnosis impossible, how can a physician determine whether a disease stems from deficiency or excess, cold or heat? Furthermore, how can one establish definitive guidelines for using medications lightly or heavily, or treating slowly or urgently?
Unexpectedly, I realized that what the ancients intended to teach me was already clearly recorded in their writings, anticipating my own thoughts. Through repeated reflection, I came to understand that the phrase "deep-hidden pulse implies impossibility of diagnosis" means that one must rely on other symptoms to differentiate the condition before determining the treatment method.
Therefore, for patients presenting with pain and a deep-hidden pulse, I invariably examine the tendons for cyanosis or purple discoloration to identify Sha Syndrome (a acute condition caused by toxic stagnation in the meridians). Similarly, for diseases presenting with a deep-hidden pulse but no pain, I also examine the tendons for cyanosis or purple discoloration to identify Sha Syndrome. This is because Sha toxins obstruct blood flow within the meridians, causing the pulse to become deep-hidden and imperceptible. If treated with acupuncture, the release of blood and Qi dissipates the obstruction, allowing the pulse to return to its normal state.
However, in severe cases of Sha Syndrome where the damage extends to the intestines, stomach, and the Three Yin meridians, acupuncture may be insufficient, and bloodletting may not fully expel the pathogen. In such instances, I treat based on the toxicity obstructed by food retention, blood stasis, and phlegm. Once the pulse recovers following herbal administration, if the illness persists, one can then rely on the pulse to guide further medication. Only then does one truly appreciate the ancients' assertion that "various pains with deep-hidden pulses are indeed difficult to diagnose through pulse alone." The guidance provided by the ancients is indeed founded upon profound insight.