所以谓伤寒、热病有别者,别于诊不别于症,别于法不别于药。气盛身寒,得之伤寒;
气虚
身热,得之伤暑。诊之别也。然而伤寒传变,则亦身热;伤暑发狂,则亦气盛。非症之无别
者
乎?浅人误认,职是故耳!伤寒皆先汗后下;温热或先下后汗∶法之别也。然而汗则麻、葛,
下则硝、黄;伤寒之汗、下以是,温热之汗、下亦以是。非药之无别者乎?由是推之,伤寒
虽因于寒,一经化热,舍黄连、石膏,更用何药以凉之?温热虽已为热,倘或过治,舍干姜
、附子,更用何药以温之?人生之患,纵有万端,本草之数,止此一定,药可通用,方何独
不可通用?近之解《伤寒论》者,执其中之白虎、黄芩等汤,以证此书之兼出温热治法。彼
将谓伤寒病始终不宜寒药,温热病始终不宜温药乎?噫!医可若是之固哉?
寒之为气,虽截然与热对峙,而其伤人也,则随人虚实而为病。其人实,则寒不能深入
,但
着于皮肤,而闭其腠理,即不得不热;其人虚,则寒无所隔碍,遂过乎肌表而达于脏腑,即
不得不寒。苟取《素》风论之旨绎之,即知仲景方论寒热杂见之故矣。若《素》热论人伤于
寒,则为病热云云,乃专主寒邪在经之常法,以答篇首六七日之问,不兼直中言,与仲景为
寒字尽致者义别。河间泥此,遂谓伤寒有热无寒,概指通脉、理中等症,为得之寒药误下,
非惟浓诬仲景,并误会《内经》也。寒之乘也,猛于他气,故例曰∶其伤于四时之气,皆能
为病。以伤寒为毒者,以其最成杀厉之气也。河间乃谓温热凉寒,皆取伤寒而分其微甚,是
以伤寒为四气病统称,岂其然乎?寒之藏也,历春至夏,则阳气大泄,而不能复留,故例止
云寒毒藏于肌骨,至春变为温病,至夏变为暑病。河间乃续之曰∶秋变为湿病,冬变为正伤
寒。如此任意增改,其不足与语伤寒也明矣。
Therefore, it is said that the distinction between Shanghan (Cold Damage) and Rebing (Heat Disease) lies in the difference of diagnosis, not symptoms; in the difference of treatment principles, not herbs. When Qi is abundant but the body feels cold, this results from contracting Shanghan; when Qi is deficient but the body feels hot, this results from contracting Shangs (Summerheat). This constitutes the distinction in diagnosis. However, during the transmission of Shanghan, the body may also become hot; when Shangs leads to mania, Qi may also become abundant. Is this not an indication that there is no distinction in symptoms? Superficial practitioners misunderstand this, precisely due to this reason!
The treatment for Shanghan typically employs sweating methods first, followed by purgative methods; whereas the treatment for Wenre (Warm-Heat) diseases may employ purgative methods first, followed by sweating methods: this constitutes the distinction in treatment principles. However, sweating often utilizes Ephedrae Herba (Mahuang, 麻黄) and Puerariae Radix (Gegen, 葛根); purgation often utilizes Mirabilite (Xiashaofen, 硝) and Rhubarb (Dahuang, 大黄). The sweating and purgative treatments for Shanghan use these, and the sweating and purgative treatments for Wenre also use these. Is this not an indication that there is no distinction in herbs? From this we can infer: although Shanghan originates from Cold pathogen, once it transforms into Heat, apart from Coptidis Rhizoma (Huanglian, 黄连) and Gypsum Fibrosum (Shigao, 石膏), what other herbs can be used to cool it? Although Wenre disease is already a Heat condition, if treated excessively leading to Yang deficiency, apart from Zingiberis Radix Preparata (Ganjiang, 干姜) and Aconiti Lateralis Radix Preparata (Fuzi, 附子), what other herbs can be used to warm it? Human ailments, though myriad in nature, are limited by the fixed number of herbs in Materia Medica. If herbs can be used universally, why should formulas not be used universally?
Recent commentators on the *Treatise on Cold Damage* (*Shanghan Lun*) cling to formulas such as Baihu Tang (White Tiger Decoction) and Huangqin Tang (Scutellaria Decoction) found within the text, using them to prove that this book encompasses treatment methods for Warm-Heat diseases. Would they claim that Shanghan disease should never use Cold herbs throughout its course, and that Warm-Heat disease should never use Warm herbs throughout its course? Alas! Can physicians be so rigid and inflexible?
The Qi of Cold, although distinctly opposed to Heat, affects humans according to their constitution's excess or deficiency. If a person is Excess (Shi), Cold cannot penetrate deeply; it merely attaches to the skin and closes the Couli (pores), inevitably resulting in Heat manifestation. If a person is Deficient (Xu), Cold encounters no obstruction, passes through the muscle layer, and reaches the Zang-Fu organs, inevitably resulting in Cold manifestation. If one expounds upon the principles of the *Suwen: Fenglun* (Wind Chapter of the Basic Questions), one will understand the reason why Zhang Zhongjing’s formula discussions present mixed Cold and Heat symptoms.
The statement in *Suwen: Relun* (Heat Chapter of the Basic Questions) that "when humans are injured by Cold, they develop Heat diseases," etc., specifically addresses the standard method of Cold pathogen residing in the meridians, answering the question posed at the beginning of the chapter regarding the six-to-seven-day progression. It does not include direct invasion (Zhizhong) into the interior, which differs in meaning from Zhang Zhongjing’s exhaustive elaboration on the concept of "Cold." Liu Hejian, adhering rigidly to this view, asserted that Shanghan involves only Heat and no Cold, attributing conditions treated with Tongmai Sini Tang (Pulse-Recovering Decoction) and Lizhong Tang (Regulate the Middle Decoction) solely to errors caused by mistaken purgation with Cold herbs. This not only severely slandered Zhang Zhongjing but also misinterpreted the *Neijing*.
Cold attacks more fiercely than other pathogens; hence, the general principle states: "Injury by the Qi of the four seasons can all cause disease." Shanghan is termed "poison" because it forms the most lethal and destructive Qi. Liu Hejian, however, argued that Warm, Heat, Cool, and Cold are all derived from Shanghan, differentiated only by degree, thereby treating Shanghan as a collective term for diseases caused by the four seasonal pathogens. Is this really the case?
Cold hides within the body. Passing through Spring to Summer, Yang Qi is greatly depleted and cannot remain stored. Therefore, the general principle states only that Cold poison hides in the muscles and bones, transforming into Wenbing (Warm Diseases) in Spring and Shubing (Summerheat Diseases) in Summer. Liu Hejian added: transforming into Shibing (Dampness Diseases) in Autumn, and Zhengshanghan (True Shanghan) in Winter. Such arbitrary alteration makes it clear that he is unworthy of discussing the principles of Shanghan.