司命之难也在识证,识证之难也在辨证,识其为阴为阳,为虚为实,为六淫,为七情,而不同揣合
也。辨其在经在络,在腑在脏,在营卫,在筋骨,而非关臆度也。顾脉理易淆,洞垣谁属,赖古作家别类分
门,条列治要,且于一症,错综疑似,缕析丝分,参合脉象,详哉言之,仰见心裁独出矣。然不先窥《内
经》奥旨,则皆无本之学也。遂古圣人,尽己性,尽人性,参赞元化,仁寿斯民,其心法备载《灵》、《素》
各八十一篇。自越人祖述心法,垂为《难经》,嗣后长沙论《伤寒》,分究六经。河间治温热,专主三焦。
东垣倡益气补中。丹溪创滋阴降火,济偏补缺。要皆上阐经训,下启法门,卓然自成大家。由有明迄今,
诸名家亦无不根柢圣经,发挥心得,以着于篇。学人研经,旁及诸家,泛览沉酣,深造自得,久之源流条贯,
自然胸有主裁。第学不博无以通其变,思不精无以烛其微;惟博也故腕妙于应,而生面别开;惟精也故悟彻
于元,而重关直辟。平时灼有定见,临证不设成心,诊毕矣审用何法,法合矣选用何方,权衡乎禀之浓薄,
病之浅深,治之标本,药之浮沉,及一切正治从治,上取下取,或上病取下,下病取上,或从阴引阳,从
阳引阴,必先岁气,无伐天和。乃知执一者拘,多歧者泛,师心者愎,随俗者庸。至于体贴病情,曲折都尽,
刀圭所授,立起沉 ,善矣!若犹未也,一法未合,虽古法宜裁;一方未纯,虽古方宜裁;必吻合而后已。
此其难,殆又在识证辨证后乎。乃观近日悬壶家,大率学殖荒芜,心思肤浅,甚则治温疫以伤寒法,治血枯
以通瘀法,与
夫喜行温补,罔顾留邪,动辄攻消,不知扶正,轻者重,重者死矣。予思矫而正之,己巳计偕后,归而就馆,
笔墨少闲,爰始搜辑。丙戍后,又苦南北奔驰,今老矣,分编讨究,惧有遗珠,除《伤寒》全帙无容赘衍外,
余多宗经立论,酌古用方,更欲略辑疡科,兼及幼科,而老病浸寻,来日苦短,缺略之憾,统俟续成。且生平
本不业医,间有治案,附于症后,非云程序也,聊存梗概,以寓别裁之微意云尔。编名《治裁》,愿与有志
医学人共裁之。
道光十九年岁次己亥端午日丹阳林 琴自题
The difficulty in saving lives lies in recognizing the syndrome (Zheng, a pattern of disharmony); and the difficulty in recognizing the syndrome lies in differentiating it. One must distinguish whether it is Yin or Yang, deficiency or excess, caused by the Six Excesses (Liu Yin, external pathogenic factors: wind, cold, summer-heat, dampness, dryness, fire) or the Seven Emotions (Qi Qing, emotional responses: joy, anger, worry, thought, grief, fear, fright), rather than making random guesses or forced combinations.
One must differentiate whether the pathology is in the Channels (Jing, meridians) or Collaterals (Luo), in the Fu Organs (Zang Fu, hollow organs) or Zang Organs (solid organs), in the Ying Qi (Nutritive Qi) or Wei Qi (Defensive Qi), or in the sinews and bones, rather than relying on subjective speculation.
However, pulse theory is easily confused; who can see through walls like Bian Que? Fortunately, ancient masters categorized diseases, listed treatment essentials systematically, and for each symptom, amidst complex and ambiguous presentations, analyzed them meticulously, integrating pulse findings to explain them in detail, demonstrating unique insight.
Yet, without first grasping the profound principles of the *Huangdi Neijing* (Yellow Emperor's Inner Canon), all learning becomes rootless. The sages of antiquity fully realized their own nature and human nature, assisted in the transformation of the cosmos, and ensured benevolence and longevity for the people. Their therapeutic methods are fully recorded in the 81 chapters of the *Lingshu* (Spiritual Pivot) and *Suwen* (Basic Questions).
Since Yue Ren (Bian Que) inherited and expounded upon these methods, passing them down in the *Nanjing* (Classic of Difficult Issues), subsequently Zhang Zhongjing discussed *Shanghan Lun* (Treatise on Cold Damage), investigating the Six Stages (Liu Jing: Taiyang, Yangming, Shaoyang, Taiyin, Shaoyin, Jueyin). Liu Wansu (Hejian) treated warm-heat diseases, focusing on the Sanjiao (Triple Burner). Li Dongyuan advocated tonifying Qi and supplementing the Middle Jiao. Zhu Danxi created methods for nourishing Yin and descending Fire, correcting biases and filling gaps. All these elucidated classical teachings from above and opened new therapeutic gates below, standing out as distinct masters.
From the Ming Dynasty to the present, various notable physicians have all rooted their work in the Classics, expounding personal insights in their writings. Students who study the Classics, branch out to other schools, read extensively and immerse themselves, achieving deep understanding through independent effort, will naturally have a clear grasp of the origins and continuity over time.
However, without broad learning, one cannot comprehend changes; without precise thinking, one cannot illuminate subtleties. Because of breadth, one handles situations with skill and opens new perspectives; because of precision, one thoroughly comprehends the fundamental principles and breaks through barriers directly. With firm views during daily practice and no preconceived notions during clinical application, after diagnosis, one carefully selects the method; once the method is set, one selects the formula, weighing the patient's constitution (thick or thin), the depth of the disease, the priority of root versus branch, the ascending/descending properties of herbs, and all orthodox treatments (Zheng Zhi, treating contrary to the disease nature) or following treatments (Cong Zhi, treating according to the disease nature), upper diseases treated via lower points, lower diseases via upper points, drawing Yang from Yin or Yin from Yang, always considering the annual climate qi first, without violating the harmony of Heaven and Humanity.
Thus, one knows that sticking to one method is rigid, following many paths is superficial, acting on one's own mind is obstinate, and following customs is mediocre. As for understanding the condition thoroughly, exhausting all nuances, prescribing minimal doses yet instantly curing severe conditions, this is excellent! If not yet there, if one method does not fit, even ancient methods should be discarded; if one formula is not pure, even ancient formulas should be discarded, until they perfectly match.
This difficulty likely lies beyond just recognizing and differentiating the syndrome. Observing contemporary practitioners, most have barren scholarship and shallow thinking. Some even treat warm epidemics using Shanghan methods, or treat blood depletion using blood-stasis-resolving methods. Others favor warming and tonifying, ignoring retained pathogens; or frequently use attacking and reducing methods, failing to support healthy Qi, turning mild cases severe and severe cases fatal.
I considered correcting this trend. After the Jisi year when I took the provincial examination, I returned home to teach. With little leisure for writing, I began collecting materials. After the Bingxu year, suffering from travel between north and south, now old, I divide and discuss topics, fearing omissions. Except for the complete volume of *Shanghan*, which needs no redundancy, the rest mostly establish theories based on Classics and select ancient formulas. I also wished to briefly compile surgical and pediatric sections, but illness and age advance, days are short. Regrets of omission await future completion.
Moreover, my profession was never medicine. Occasional case records attached after symptoms are not meant as standard procedures, but merely to preserve outlines, expressing my intent for unique selection. The book is named *Zhicai* (Selected Treatments), hoping those interested in medicine will review and judge it together.
On the Dragon Boat Festival day of the Jisi year, in the 19th year of Daoguang, Lin Qin of Danyang inscribed this.