热达于表又重伤表气故不禁风寒非伤风恶风伤寒恶寒也但卫虚则恶风荣虚则恶寒耳且温病热病亦有先见表证而后传里
者盖怫热自内达外热郁腠理不得外泄遂复还里而成可攻之证非如伤寒从表而始也或者不悟此理乃于春夏温病热病而求
浮紧之脉不亦疏乎殊不知紧为寒脉有寒邪则见之无寒邪则不见也其温病热病或见紧脉者乃重感不正之暴寒与内伤过度
之冷食也岂其本然哉又或者不识脉形但见弦便呼为紧断为寒而妄治盖脉之盛而有力者每每兼弦岂可错认为紧而断为寒
夫温病热病之脉多在肌肉之分而不甚浮且右手反盛于左手者诚由怫热在内故也其或左手盛或浮者必有重感之风寒否则
非温病热病自是暴感风寒之病耳凡温病热病若无重感表证虽间见而里病为多故少有不渴者斯时也法当治里热为主而解
表兼之亦有治里而表自解者余每见世人治温热病虽误攻其里亦无大害误发其表变不可言此足以明其热之自内达外矣其
间有误攻里而致大害者乃春夏暴寒所中之疫证邪纯在表未入于里故也不可与温病热病同论夫惟世以温病热病混称伤寒
故每执寒字以求浮紧之脉以用温热之药若此者因名乱实而戕人之生名其可不正乎又方书多言四时伤寒故以春夏之温病
热病与秋冬之伤寒一类视之而无所别夫秋冬之伤寒真伤寒也春夏之伤寒寒疫也与温病热病自是两涂岂可同治吁此弊之
来非一日矣虽然伤寒与温病热病其攻里之法若果是以寒除热固不必求异其发表之法断不可不异也况伤寒之直伤阴经与
太阳虽伤不及郁热即传阴经为寒证而当温者又与温病热病大不同其可妄治乎或者知一不知二故谓仲景发表药今不可用
而攻里之药乃可用呜呼其可用不可用之理果何在哉若能辨其因正其名察其形治法其有不当者乎彼时行不正之气所作及
重感异气而变者则又当观其何时何气参酌伤寒温热病之法损益而治之尤不可例以仲景即病伤寒药通治也
Heat reaches the exterior and severely damages the Wei Qi (Defensive Qi), thus failing to resist wind and cold. This is distinct from Shang Feng (Wind Strike) characterized by aversion to wind, and Shang Han (Cold Damage) characterized by aversion to cold. Merely, deficiency of Wei Qi leads to aversion to wind, while deficiency of Ying Qi (Nutritive Qi) leads to aversion to cold. Furthermore, Wen Bing (Warm Diseases) and Re Bing (Heat Diseases) may also initially present with exterior syndromes before transmitting inward. This occurs because constrained heat originates internally and reaches the exterior; heat stagnates in the Cou Li (skin pores and interstices) without being able to vent outward, subsequently returning inward to form a syndrome amenable to purgation. This differs from Shang Han, which begins at the exterior.
Some individuals fail to comprehend this principle and seek a Floating-Tight pulse (Fu Jin Mai) in the warm and heat diseases of spring and summer, which is indeed negligent. It must be understood that "Tight" is a pulse indicating cold; it appears only when cold pathogenic factors are present and does not appear otherwise. The occurrence of a Tight pulse in Wen Bing or Re Bing is due to secondary exposure to sudden cold from abnormal climatic factors, or excessive internal injury caused by consuming cold food. Is this their inherent nature?
Alternatively, some lack knowledge of pulse morphology; upon perceiving a Wiry pulse (Xian Mai), they mislabel it as Tight and diagnose it as Cold, administering inappropriate treatment. Often, pulses that are vigorous and forceful also exhibit a Wiry quality; how can one mistake them for Tight and diagnose Cold?
The pulses of Wen Bing and Re Bing are typically located at the level of the muscles rather than being superficially floating, and the Right Hand pulse is often stronger than the Left Hand pulse. This is indeed due to constrained heat residing internally. If the Left Hand pulse is strong or floating, it indicates secondary exposure to wind and cold; otherwise, it is not Wen Bing or Re Bing, but a disease caused by sudden exposure to wind and cold. In cases of Wen Bing or Re Bing without secondary exterior exposure, although exterior signs may occasionally appear, interior syndromes predominate; thus, thirst is rarely absent. At this stage, the treatment method should primarily focus on clearing interior heat, accompanied by resolving the exterior. There are also instances where treating the interior resolves the exterior spontaneously.
I frequently observe that when physicians treat warm-heat diseases, even if they mistakenly use purgation for the interior, there is usually no severe harm. However, if they mistakenly use diaphoresis (sweating methods) for the exterior, the resulting complications are incalculable. This sufficiently demonstrates that the heat originates from within and extends outward.
Among these, those who suffer severe harm from mistaken purgation are suffering from Yi Zheng (Epidemic Patterns) struck by sudden cold in spring and summer, where the pathogen resides purely in the exterior and has not entered the interior. Therefore, they cannot be discussed together with Wen Bing or Re Bing.
Since the world conflates Wen Bing and Re Bing under the term Shang Han, people often cling to the character "Cold" to seek a Floating-Tight pulse and employ warm-hot medications. Such practices confuse names with reality and endanger lives; how can such nomenclature not be corrected?
Furthermore, medical texts often discuss Four Seasons Shang Han, categorizing the warm and heat diseases of spring and summer alongside the cold damage of autumn and winter without distinction. However, the cold damage of autumn and winter is True Shang Han, whereas the cold damage of spring and summer is Han Yi (Cold Epidemic). These are distinct from Wen Bing and Re Bing and should not be treated identically. Alas, this malpractice has existed for a long time.
Nevertheless, regarding the method of purging the interior for Shang Han versus Wen Bing/Re Bing, if the goal is indeed to eliminate heat with cold herbs, there is no need to seek difference. However, the method of releasing the exterior must absolutely differ. Moreover, Shang Han directly injuring the Yin Channels, or Tai Yang (Greater Yang) channel involvement where heat does not constrain but transmits to Yin channels becoming a Cold Syndrome requiring warming, is vastly different from Wen Bing and Re Bing. How can such conditions be treated recklessly?
Some know one aspect but not the other, claiming that Zhang Zhongjing's exterior-releasing formulas are now unusable, while purgatory formulas are usable. Oh, what is the rationale behind what is usable and what is not?
If one can discern the etiology, correct the nomenclature, examine the pulse morphology, and formulate appropriate treatments, would there be any impropriety? As for diseases caused by epidemic abnormal qi, or those transformed by secondary exposure to different pathogens, one must observe the timing and specific pathogenic factors, referring to the methods of Shang Han and Warm-Heat Diseases for modification and treatment. One must especially avoid indiscriminately using Zhang Zhongjing's formulas for immediate-onset Shang Han to treat all cases.