难经集注五卷。明王九思等集录吴吕广、唐杨玄操、宋丁德用、虞庶、杨康侯注解者。按晁公武郡斋读书志。载吕
杨注一卷。丁注五卷。虞注五卷。陈振孙书录解题。载丁注二卷。马端临经籍考。引晁氏作吕杨注五卷。盖当时各家别
行。至九思等始掇辑以便观览耳。叶盛绿竹堂书目。载难经集注一册。不着撰人名氏。此则书名偶同。非九思所集。按
王圻续经籍考。载金纪天锡难经集注五卷。盛之所收恐此耳。盛、正统进士。九思、宏治进士。则其非是编也明矣。其
他诸家藏 书目。及乾隆四库全书总目。并未收入。若殷仲春医藏目录。宜裒搜无遗。而亦遗之。盖似失传者。然以余
不涉医家。但知据目录考之耳。因质诸医官多纪廉夫。廉夫云。近代医书。绝无援引。久疑散佚。廉夫于医家。雅称赅
洽。而其言如此。则知其果失传也。夫方伎一家。固有其人。其存其佚。何干我事。然小道可观。至理存焉。则竟非可
弃也。
癸亥花朝天瀑识。
*Jie Jing Ji Zhu* (Collected Commentaries on the Classic of Difficult Issues) consists of five volumes. It was compiled by Wang Jiusi and others in the Ming Dynasty, gathering the commentaries of Lü Guang from the Wu Kingdom, Yang Xuancuo from the Tang Dynasty, Ding Deyong, Yu Shu, and Yang Kanghou from the Song Dynasty. According to Chao Gongwu’s *Junzhai Dushu Zhi* (Record of Books in the Commandery Study), it records Lü and Yang’s commentary as one volume, Ding’s commentary as five volumes, and Yu’s commentary as five volumes. Chen Zhen-sun’s *Shulu Tijie* (Annotated Record of Books) records Ding’s commentary as two volumes. Ma Duanlin’s *Wenxian Tongkao: Jingji Kao* (Examination of Classics in the Comprehensive Study of Literary Remains), citing Chao’s work, states that Lü and Yang’s commentary is five volumes. This suggests that at that time, each school’s commentary was circulated separately; it was not until Wang Jiusi and others collected them together that they became convenient for reading and viewing. Ye Sheng’s *Luzhu Tang Shumu* (Catalogue of Green Bamboo Hall) lists a single fascicle of *Nan Ji Ji Zhu* (Collected Commentaries on the Classic of Difficult Issues) without specifying the author's name. The title here coincidentally matches but is not the collection compiled by Wang Jiusi. According to Wang Qi’s *Xu Jingji Kao* (Continued Examination of Classics), Ji Tianxi from the Jin Dynasty authored *Nan Ji Ji Zhu* in five volumes; the copy collected by Ye Sheng was likely this one. Ye Sheng was a Jinshi (successful candidate in the imperial examination) during the Zhengtong era, while Wang Jiusi was a Jinshi during the Hongzhi era; thus, it is clear that Ye Sheng’s copy was not this compilation. Other private library catalogs and the *Siku Quanshu Zongmu* (General Catalog of the Complete Library of the Four Treasuries) compiled during the Qianlong reign did not include it. Although Yin Zhongchun’s *Yicang Mulu* (Catalogue of the Medical Treasury) should have been exhaustive in its search, it also omitted this work. It appears that the book had seemingly fallen into obscurity or been lost. However, since I am not versed in medical studies, I could only rely on catalogues for verification. Therefore, I consulted Duoji Lianfu, a medical official. Lianfu stated that modern medical texts are rarely cited or referenced, leading to long-standing suspicions of their dispersal or loss. As Lianfu was renowned for his comprehensive knowledge in medicine, his statement confirms that the text indeed has been lost. Although the school of technical arts (*Fangji*) certainly has its practitioners, whether these texts survive or perish concerns me little. Nevertheless, even minor arts contain observable principles, and profound truths reside within them; therefore, they cannot simply be discarded.
Written by Huachao Tianpu in the Guihai year.