未免传疑承误云云。赵希弁亦称。大观中。诏通医。刊正药局方书。而校正增损。然则是书非 出师文等。崇宁
以后。既为刊本。师文因以重修者。故宋志冠以师文校正字也。
〔增广校正和剂局方〕五卷 存
按是书。往岁姬路侯大夫川合元升（鼎）得之西京书估。以赠于先子。盖南宋 本也。校通行本。无窦庆以
下方。虽有绍兴续添。别不标识。至诸家名方。不题吴直阁增字。则知绍兴中吴直阁所增广也。然兹本不载其名
字。所谓吴直阁者。难识为何人。且兹本但题增广校正。无太平惠民字。与读书志所载符。弟坚曰。玉海。书录
解题。并
称师文等旧本。凡二百九十七方。二十一门。今通行本。大观旧方。与续添虽各为区别。溢出二方。至分类仅十
四门。其旧不可复睹。特至兹本。了然可辨。与幼幼新书引合。其存旧色者。无疑矣。详玉海称二十一门并其目
录而言。今兹本诸风一切气痼冷妇人篇题下。无附香港脚脾胃消渴产图字。大小篇目。共二十一门。而治伤寒后。
有脾胃一门。照通行本。知是绍兴所添。若其诸方无重见者。间与通行本不同。有参苓饮子。（伤寒诸家名方）
思食丸。（一切气诸家名方）降气汤。（诸汤诸家名方）三方。无四斤铁弹黑龙三丸。（诸风）渗湿汤。冰黄散。
（伤寒）丁香脾积丸。（一切气）二陈汤。（痰饮）水煮木香丸。缚虎丸。（泻痢）寸金丸。夺命丹。（杂病）
化毒排脓内补十全散。没药降圣丹。（疮肿）牛膝汤。济危上丹。琥珀黑龙丹。济阴丹。琥珀黑散。术香散。竹
茹汤。（妇人）人参散。钱氏白术散。（小儿）清远香。（香方）凡二十二方。又一切气感应丸。至红丸子。共
十三方。吴直阁如神丸。别为脾胃不和门。诸局麝香苏合香丸。（一切气）吴大香连丸。（泻痢）在大观方内。
大观生气汤。（一切气）在绍兴方内。绍兴温肺汤。（痰饮）大观七枣汤。（泻痢）淳 春雪膏。（眼目）硼砂
散。（咽喉）宝庆至圣保命丹。挨积丸。（小儿）在诸家名方内。盖通行本所错。宜订正焉。又通行本牛黄清心
丸。其药味次第。征周氏杂识不同。今兹本则否。前八味。为牛黄。金箔。麝香。犀角。雄黄。龙脑。羚羊角。
蒲黄。后二十一味。与大山芋丸同。但有黄芩。无熟干地黄。为异。是则合乎杂识所云。先子尝以此八味。疗中
风及惊痫。殊有神验。此等关系匪轻。所以医方之书，必贵古本也。
〔许氏（洪）注太平惠民和剂局方〕佚
自序曰。本草一编。实医家之本根。肇于黄帝岐伯。而大备于我宋。若昔圣贤。其于制方之始。虽曰神融心
会。与造化合其妙。然药之君臣佐使。寒温良毒。与夫治疗之所主。凡识其性而用之。各当其宜者。皆自本草中
来。后世用方。讵不可于此而究心焉。不然。则纸上之传。有如药之舛
讹。（谓如以黄芩为黄 。是也。性之冷热。甚于水火。若此之类。不可缕载。始举其大略如此。）分两之差误。
（谓加以一钱为一两。以一分为一斤。是也。古人处方之意多不口或少不口增。此尤不可不察。）往往皆莫敢
是正。不知冷热相反。多寡不称。失之毫厘。谬以千里。以此疗疾。无益有伤。虽曰据方炮制。对证投饵。其与
实实虚虚。损不足补有余者。何以异。洪袭父祖业三世矣。今古方书。无不历览。就其径而效神者。惟太平惠民
和剂局方为之最。所恨枝行日久。乌马失真。洪于供职暇日。谨证以监本。精加校定。尚虑或者以为出己意之私。
于是按诸家本草所载。具注药注于逐品之下。将使业医者。朝夕玩味。自然默会前人制方妙处。是书之成。上足
以仰赞圣朝惠朝之万一。跻天下于寿域。兹实其喈。下足以为良医箧笥之宝。其或诊病有浅深。用药合加减。变
而通之。无施不可，非特此尔。卫生君子。傥一过目。亦可以释夫未达之疑。仍并将吴直阁得效名方。及诸局经
验秘方。各随条类。附于本方之下。又编次和剂指南总论。以冠帙首。期与并行于时。此区区蝇附骥尾之愿也。
洪欲畀之书市。深恐急于财利者漫不加意。复蹈前车之覆。则亦洪之罪也。令敬委积庆名家。以阴 为念者。锓
木以传。庶几志与我同。不至灭裂以误天下。扁鹊仓公傥复生斯世。必深嘉洪之用心。时嘉定改元。岁在戊辰日
南长至。敕授太医助教。前差充四川总领所。检察惠民局许洪谨书。
〔太平惠民和剂局方指南总论〕三卷 存
〔卢氏（祖常）拟进太平惠民和剂类例〕佚
按是书世无传本。祖常于其所着续易简方中。每言及之。盖似评论病证，以辨治方者矣。
〔亡名氏增广太平惠民和剂局方〕十卷 存
朱彝尊跋曰。太平惠民和剂局方十卷。载晁氏读书后志。陈氏书录解题。宋艺文志。作五卷。按宋大观中。
诏通医。刊正药局方。于是库部郎中陈师文等校正。类分二十一门。录方二百九十有七。然则是书成于汴都也。
今考王氏玉海置药局四所。其一曰和剂局。在绍兴六年正月。至若改熟药所。为太平惠民局。在绍兴十八年又八
月。盖师文等校正本。实止五卷。其后添补绍兴宝庆淳 诸方。暨吴直阁方诸局方。故增益至十卷尔。予家所藏。
乃元时雕本。后附太医助教许洪指南三卷。系建安高氏日新堂板行。
四库全书提要曰。太平惠民和剂局方十卷。指南总论三卷。旧本题宋库部郎中提辖措置药局陈师文等奉敕编。
案王应麟玉海云。大观中。陈师文等。校正和剂局方五卷。二百九十七道。二十一门。晁公武读书志云。大观中。
诏通医。刊正药局方书。阅岁书成。校正七百八字。增损七十余方。又读书后志曰。太医局方十卷。元丰中。诏
天下高手医各以得效秘方进。下太医局验试。根据方制药鬻之。仍摹本传于世。是大观之本。实因神宗时旧本重修。
故公武有校正增损之语也。然此本止十四门。而方乃七百八十八。考玉海。又载绍兴十八年。闰八月二十三日。
改熟药所。为太平惠民局。二十一年十二月十七日。以监本药方颁诸路。此本以太平惠民为名。是绍兴所颁之监
本。非大观之旧矣。其中又有宝庆淳 续添诸方。更在绍兴之后。兼附用药总论指南三卷。皆从图经本草。钞撮
增入。亦不知何时所加。陈振孙书录解题。称和剂局方。其后时有增补。殆指此类欤。戴良九灵山房集。有丹溪
翁朱震亨传。曰。时方盛行陈师文裴宗元
所定。大观二百九十七方。翁穷昼夜是习。既而悟曰。操古方以治今病。其势不能以尽合。苟将起度量。立规矩。
称权衡。必也。素难诸经乎。又称震亨得罗知悌之学以归。诸医泥陈裴之学人。闻其言。大惊而笑且排。及治许
谦末疾良验。笑且排者。始皆心服。是此书盛行于宋元之间。至震亨局方发挥出。而医学始一变也。又岳珂 史
曰。和剂局方。乃当时精集诸家名方。凡几经名医之手。至提领以从官。内臣参校。可谓精矣。然其间差讹者。
亦自不少。且以牛黄清心丸一方言之。凡用药二十九味。寒热讹杂。殊不可晓。尝见一名医云。此方只前八味。
至蒲黄而止。自干山药以下。凡二十一味。乃补虚门中山芋丸。当时不知缘何误写。在此方之后。因循不曾改正。
余因其说而考之。信然。如此之类。必多有之云云。是并不能无所舛误矣。然历代相传。专门禁方。多有是焉。
在用者详审而已。必因噎而废食。则又一偏之见矣。
张海鹏跋曰。宋崇宁中置七局。始有和剂之名。绍兴间。改熟药所。为太平惠民局。取崇观以来所收局方。
分门编纂。名太平惠民和剂局方十卷。指南总论三卷。分十四门。七百八十八方。盖有绍兴至宝庆淳 。时有增
补。非大观中二百九十七道之旧也。今此本十四门。除产前产后二方。胎神游方催生符。及后附四香。不可谓之
方外。止六百七十四方。名增广太平惠民和剂局方十卷。后有图经本草。药性总论三卷。无指南之名。既云增广。
而与无增广二字之本。转少一百十四方。岂陈裴而后。又有从而详校增减者欤。癸辛杂志谓。清心丸二十九味。
止前八味。至蒲黄而止。自干山药以下。凡二十一味。乃山芋丸所误入者。今此
本牛黄清心丸所载。药味次弟。自牛黄至蒲黄。已十九味。后十味以干山药而止。与癸辛杂志所云不同。其为后
人重订之本可知也。要之此书。虽有朱丹溪驳辨。然当时精簇方。几经名医之论定。献于朝。行于世。所谓得
十全之效。无纤芥之疑者。苟非实有足以惠民。岂竟为纸上空谈。以误世哉。虽传写或间有讹误。不可因噎而废
食。余因久无刊刻之家。抄录不无亥豕。所以校对至再至三。以期详慎无误。而付之梓。尚望好我者。惠我古本。
俾随时订正。幸甚幸甚。乙丑四月。虞山张海鹏识。
按太医局方。与和剂局方。本自不同。提要误以此书为神宗时旧本重修。疏甚。
〔增注太平惠民和剂局方〕十卷 存
按是书。不知修乎何人。盖许洪所注。止于吴直阁得效名方。及诸局经验秘方。兹本并宝庆淳 增添新方。
俱加笺解。则宋季人所续修。卷首犹题洪名衔。
〔朱氏（震亨）局方发挥〕一卷 存
朱震亨曰。和剂局方之为书也。可以据证检方。即方用药。不必求医。不必修制。寻赎见成丸散。病痛便可
安痊。仁民之意。可谓至矣。自宋迄今。官府守之以为法。医门传之以为业。病者恃之以立命。世人习之以成俗。
然予窃有疑焉。何者。古人以神圣工巧言医。又曰。医者意也。以其传授虽的。造诣虽深。临机应变。如对敌之
将。操舟之工。自非尽君子随时反中之妙。宁无愧于医乎。今乃集前人已效之方。应今人无限之病。何异刻舟求
剑。按图索骥。其偶然中难矣。
张介宾曰。局方一书。虽云多用热涩。然于实热新邪。岂云皆用此法。观其所载太平丸。戊己丸。香连丸。
薷苓汤
之类。岂非以寒治热者耶。又若真人养脏汤。大己寒丸。胡椒理中汤之类。皆有可用之法。其中随证酌宜。顾在
用之者何如耳。岂局方专以热涩为用。而可斥其非耶。且是书之行。乃宋神宗诏天下高医。各以效方奏进而成者。
此其中或过于粉饰者。料不能无。而真效之方。必亦不少。第在丹溪之言火多者。谓热药能杀人。而余察其为寒
多者。则但见寒药之杀人耳。明者其深察之。（景岳全书）
四库全书提要曰。局方发挥一卷。元朱震亨撰。以和剂局方。不载病源。止于各方下。条列证候。立法简便。
而未能变通。因一一为之辨论。大旨专为辟温补。戒燥热而作。张介宾景岳全书云。局方一书。宋神宗（案此方。
成于徽宗之时。介宾以为神宗。殊为舛误。谨附订于此。）诏天下高医。奏进而成。虽其中或有过于粉饰者。神
效之方。亦必不少。岂可轻议。其意颇不以震亨为然。考震亨之学。出于宋内官罗知悌。知悌之学。距河间刘完
素。仅隔一传。完素主于泻火。震亨则主于滋阴。虽一攻其有余。其剂峻利。一补其不足。其剂和平。而大旨不
离其渊源。故于局方香窜燥烈诸药。谆谆致辨明。以来沿其波者。往住以黄柏知母。戕伤元气。介宾鉴其末流。
故惟以益火为宗。掊击刘朱。不遗余力。其以冰雪凛冽为不和。以天睛日暖为和。取譬固是。然清风凉雨。亦不
能谓之不和。铄石流金。亦不能强谓之和。各明一义而忘其各执一偏。其病实相等也，故介宾之说。不可不知。
而震亨是编。亦竟不可废焉。
〔亡名氏诸家名方〕书录解题二卷 佚
陈振孙曰。福建提举司所刊。市肆常货。而局方所未收者。
未免流传疑惑、承袭错误之类的话。赵希弁也称：大观年间，朝廷诏令精通医学的人，刊刻并校正药局的方书，进行增补和删减。既然如此，那么这本书并非出自陈师文等人之手，而是在崇宁年以后，既然已经有了刊印的本子，陈师文便以此为基础进行了重修。所以《宋史·艺文志》中冠以“陈师文校正”的字样。
〔增广校正和剂局方〕五卷 存世
按此书，往年姬路侯大夫川合元升（鼎）从西京的书商处得到它，赠送给我的父亲。这大概是南宋的本子。与通行的本子相比，没有窦庆以下的部分。虽然有绍兴年间续添的内容，但并没有特别标识。至于各家名方，不题写“吴直阁增字”，由此可知是绍兴年间吴直阁所增广的。然而这个本子没有记载他的名字，所谓的“吴直阁”，难以辨认是何人。而且这个本子只题写“增广校正”，没有“太平惠民”四字，这与《读书志》所载相符。弟弟坚说，《玉海》和《书录解题》都称陈师文等人的旧本，共有二百九十七个方子，二十一门。现在通行的本子，大观旧方与续添方虽然各自区分，却溢出了两个方子，而分类仅有十四门，其旧貌已不可见。唯独到了这个本子，清晰可辨，与《幼幼新书》引用的内容相吻合，它保留旧貌无疑。详细看《玉海》称二十一门是指包括目录而言。现在这个本子中，“诸风”、“一切气”、“痼冷”、“妇人”篇题下，没有附注“香港脚”、“脾胃”、“消渴”、“产图”等字样。大小篇目共二十一门，而治疗伤寒后，有“脾胃”一门，对照通行本，可知这是绍兴年间所添加的。如果这些方子没有重复出现的，偶尔与通行本不同，有参苓饮子。（伤寒诸家名方）思食丸。（一切气诸家名方）降气汤。（诸汤诸家名方）这三个方子，没有四斤铁弹黑龙三丸。（诸风）渗湿汤。冰黄散。（伤寒）丁香脾积丸。（一切气）二陈汤。（痰饮）水煮木香丸。缚虎丸。（泻痢）寸金丸。夺命丹。（杂病）化毒排脓内补十全散。没药降圣丹。（疮肿）牛膝汤。济危上丹。琥珀黑龙丹。济阴丹。琥珀黑散。术香散。竹茹汤。（妇人）人参散。钱氏白术散。（小儿）清远香。（香方）共二十二方。又“一切气”中有感应丸至红丸子，共十三方。吴直阁如神丸，单独列为“脾胃不和”门。诸局的麝香苏合香丸。（一切气）吴大香连丸。（泻痢）在大观方内。大观生气汤。（一切气）在绍兴方内。绍兴温肺汤。（痰饮）大观七枣汤。（泻痢）淳春雪膏。（眼目）硼砂散。（咽喉）宝庆至圣保命丹。挨积丸。（小儿）在诸家名方内。大概是通行本所错，应当订正。另外通行本中的牛黄清心丸，其药物味道的次序，与周氏《杂识》不同，现在这个本子则不是这样。前八味，为牛黄、金箔、麝香、犀角、雄黄、龙脑、羚羊角、蒲黄。后二十一味，与大山芋丸相同，只是有黄芩，没有熟干地黄，这是差异之处。这就合乎《杂识》所说的。先父曾经用这八味药治疗中风及惊痫，非常有神效。这种关系非同小可，所以医方的书籍，一定珍贵古本。
〔许氏（洪）注太平惠民和剂局方〕佚失
自序说：本草这一编，实际上是医家的根本，始于黄帝、岐伯，而在我们宋朝大为完备。像过去的圣贤，他们在制定方剂的开始，虽然说神融心会，与造化融合其妙处，然而药物的君臣佐使，寒温良毒，以及治疗的主攻方向，凡是认识其药性并加以使用，各得其所的，都来自本草。后世使用方剂，难道不可以在此处用心研究吗？不然的话，那么纸上的流传，就像药物的讹误一样。（比如把黄芩当作黄芩的某种变体，这是错误的。性的冷热，比水火还要严重，像这类情况，不能一一列举，这里只举其大概。）分两的差异错误。（比如加一钱为一两，以一分为一斤，这是错误的。古人处方的心意大多不减也不增，这尤其不可忽视。）往往都不敢纠正，不知道冷热相反，多少不相当，失之毫厘，谬以千里。用此来治疗疾病，无益反而有害。虽然说依据方剂炮制，对症投药，这与实证用实法、虚证用虚法，损害不足而补益有余的情况，有什么不同呢？许洪继承父祖业已经三代了。古今方书，无不浏览。沿着这条路径效仿神奇的，只有《太平惠民和剂局方》最为出色。遗憾的是流派流传日久，乌马失真。许洪在供职闲暇之日，谨慎地参照监本，精心校定。还担心有人认为是出于私意，于是按照各家本草所载，详细注明药注于每一味药之下。将使从事医学的人，朝夕玩味，自然默会前人制方的妙处。这本书的完成，上足以仰赞圣朝惠及百姓的万分之一，使天下人进入长寿之境，这确实是它的初衷；下足以成为良医箱箧中的宝物。或者诊病有浅深，用药合加减，变化通达，无所不可，不只是这样。卫生君子，如果看一眼，也可以解除未通达的疑惑。仍将吴直阁得效名方，以及诸局经验秘方，各随条类，附在本方之下。又编次《和剂指南总论》，放在卷首，期望与本书并行于世。这是我这只苍蝇依附在骏马尾巴后面的愿望。许洪想把这本书交付书市，深深担心急于求财利的人漫不经心，再次重蹈覆辙，那也是许洪的罪过。于是恭敬委托积庆名家，为了阴德考虑，刻印流传，希望志向与我相同，不至于灭裂而误导天下。扁鹊、仓公如果再生在这个时代，一定会深深赞许许洪的用心。时值嘉定改元，岁在戊辰日南长至，敕授太医助教，前差充四川总领所检察惠民局许洪谨书。
〔太平惠民和剂局方指南总论〕三卷 存世
〔卢氏（祖常）拟进太平惠民和剂类例〕佚失
按此书世上没有传本。卢祖常在所著的《续易简方》中，每每提到它。大概似乎是评论病证，以辨别治疗方剂的了。
〔亡名氏增广太平惠民和剂局方〕十卷 存世
朱彝尊跋文说：《太平惠民和剂局方》十卷，载于晁氏《读书后志》、陈氏《书录解题》、《宋艺文志》，作五卷。按宋代大观年间，诏令精通医学的人，刊正药局方。于是库部郎中陈师文等人校正，分类二十一门，收录方子二百九十七个。既然如此，那么这本书成于汴京。现在考察王应麟《玉海》记载设置药局四处，其一曰和剂局，在绍兴六年正月。至于改熟药所为太平惠民局，在绍兴十八年又八月。大概陈师文等人校正的本子，实际只止于五卷。其后添补绍兴、宝庆、淳熙等年的方子，以及吴直阁方、诸局方，所以增益至十卷罢了。我家所藏的，乃是元代雕版本，后附太医助教许洪《指南》三卷，系建安高氏日新堂板行。
四库全书提要说：《太平惠民和剂局方》十卷，《指南总论》三卷。旧本题宋库部郎中提辖措置药局陈师文等人奉敕编。案王应麟《玉海》云：大观年间，陈师文等人，校正《和剂局方》五卷，二百九十七道，二十一门。晁公武《读书志》云：大观年间，诏令精通医学的人，刊正药局方书，经过一年书成，校正七百八字，增损七十余方。又《读书后志》曰：《太医局方》十卷，元丰年间，诏令天下高手医生各以得效秘方进献，下达太医局验试，根据方子制药出售，仍摹本传于世。是大观时的本子，实在是因神宗时的旧本重修。所以公武有校正增损的话语。然而这个本子只有十四门，而方子却有七百八十八个。考《玉海》，又记载绍兴十八年闰八月二十三日，改熟药所为太平惠民局。二十一年十二月十七日，以监本药方颁行各路。这个本子以太平惠民为名，是绍兴年间颁布的监本，不是大观时的旧本了。其中又有宝庆、淳熙续添的各方，更在绍兴之后。兼附用药总论《指南》三卷，都是从《图经本草》抄撮增入的，也不知道是什么时候加的。陈振孙《书录解题》称《和剂局方》，其后时有增补，大概指这类吧。戴良《九灵山房集》有《丹溪翁朱震亨传》，说：当时方盛行陈师文、裴宗元所定的大观二百九十七方，丹溪翁穷昼夜学习。不久领悟说：拿着古方治疗今病，其势不能完全契合。如果要起度量，立规矩，称权衡，必须依靠《素问》、《难经》诸经吧。又称震亨得到罗知悌的学问回来，各位医生拘泥于陈、裴的学说的人，听到他的话，大惊且笑且排斥。等到治疗许谦的末疾非常灵验，笑且排斥的人，开始都心里佩服。是这本书盛行于宋元之间，到震亨发挥《局方》的作用，而医学才开始一变。又岳珂《桯史》说：《和剂局方》，乃是当时精集诸家名方，凡几经名医之手，至提领以从官，内臣参校，可谓精矣。然而其中差错的，也不少。且以牛黄清心丸一方言之，凡用药二十九味，寒热混杂，殊不可晓。曾见一名医说：此方只前八味，至蒲黄而止。自干山药以下，凡二十一味，乃补虚门中山芋丸，当时不知缘何误写，在此方之后，因循不曾改正。我依其说法考证，确实如此。像这类情况，必定有很多。又说：并不能无所舛误。然而历代相传，专门禁方，多有此类。在使用者详审而已。如果因为噎废食，则是又一偏之见了。
张海鹏跋文说：宋崇宁年间设置七局，始有和剂之名。绍兴年间，改熟药所为太平惠民局，取崇观以来所收局方，分门编纂，名《太平惠民和剂局方》十卷，《指南总论》三卷，分十四门，七百八十八方。大概有绍兴至宝庆、淳熙，时有增补，不是大观中二百九十七道的旧貌。现在这个本子十四门，除产前产后二方，胎神游方催生符，及后附四香，不可谓之方外，止六百七十四方，名《增广太平惠民和剂局方》十卷。后有《图经本草》、《药性总论》三卷，无《指南》之名。既云增广，而与无增广二字之本，转少一百十四方。岂陈、裴之后，又有从而详校增减的吗？《癸辛杂志》谓，清心丸二十九味，止前八味，至蒲黄而止。自干山药以下，凡二十一味，乃山芋丸所误入者。现在这个本子《牛黄清心丸》所载，药味次第，自牛黄至蒲黄，已十九味，后十味以干山药而止，与《癸辛杂志》所云不同。其为后人重订之本可知也。总之这本书，虽有朱丹溪驳辨，然当时精簇方，几经名医之论定，献于朝，行于世，所谓得十全之效，无纤芥之疑者，苟非实有足以惠民，岂竟为纸上空谈，以误世哉。虽传写或间有讹误，不可因噎而废食。我因为长久没有刊刻之家，抄录不无亥豕之误，所以校对至再至三，以期详慎无误，而付之梓。尚望好我者，惠我古本，俾随时订正，幸甚幸甚。乙丑四月，虞山张海鹏识。
按太医局方，与和剂局方，本自不同。提要误以此书为神宗时旧本重修，疏漏甚矣。
〔增注太平惠民和剂局方〕十卷 存世
按此书，不知修乎何人。大概许洪所注，止于吴直阁得效名方，及诸局经验秘方。这个本子连同宝庆、淳熙增添新方，俱加笺解，则是宋季人所续修。卷首犹题洪名衔。
〔朱氏（震亨）局方发挥〕一卷 存世
朱震亨说：《和剂局方》作为一本书，可以据证检方，即方用药，不必求医，不必修制，寻找赎买现成的丸散，病痛便可安痊。仁爱百姓的心意，可谓至极。自从宋朝到现在，官府守之以为法，医门传之以为业，病者恃之以立命，世人习之以成俗。然而我私下里有疑问。为什么呢？古人以神圣工巧言医，又说：医者意也。因为其传授虽然确切，造诣虽然深，临机应变，如对敌之将，操舟之工，如果不是尽君子随时反中之妙，难道无愧于医吗？现在竟然集合前人已效之方，应对今人无限之病，何异刻舟求剑，按图索骥，其偶然中难矣。
张介宾说：《局方》一书，虽说多用热涩，然而对于实热新邪，岂云皆用此法。观其所载太平丸、戊己丸、香连丸、薷苓汤之类，岂非以寒治热者耶？又若真人养脏汤、大己寒丸、胡椒理中汤之类，皆有可用之法。其中随证酌宜，顾在用之者何如耳。岂《局方》专以热涩为用，而可斥其非耶？且是书的行世，乃宋神宗诏令天下高医，各以效方奏进而成者。这其中或过于粉饰者，料不能无。而真效之方，必亦不少。第在丹溪之言火多者，谓热药能杀人，而我察其为寒多者，则但见寒药之杀人耳。明者其深察之。（《景岳全书》）
四库全书提要说：《局方发挥》一卷，元朱震亨撰。以《和剂局方》，不载病源，止于各方下，条列证候，立法简便，而未能变通，因一一为之辩论，大旨专为辟温补，戒燥热而作。张介宾《景岳全书》云：《局方》一书，宋神宗（案此方，成于徽宗之时，介宾以为神宗，殊为舛误，谨附订于此。）诏天下高医，奏进而成。虽其中或有过于粉饰者，神效之方，亦必不少。岂可轻议。其意颇不以震亨为然。考震亨之学，出于宋内官罗知悌，知悌之学，距河间刘完素，仅隔一传。完素主于泻火，震亨则主于滋阴。虽一攻其有余，其剂峻利，一补其不足，其剂和平，而大旨不离其渊源。故于《局方》香窜燥烈诸药，谆谆致辨明，以来沿其波者，往往以黄柏、知母，戕伤元气。介宾鉴其末流，故惟以益火为宗，掊击刘朱，不遗余力。其以冰雪凛冽为不和，以天晴日暖为和，取譬固是，然清风凉雨，亦不能谓之不和，铄石流金，亦不能强谓之和。各明一义而忘其各执一偏，其病实相等也。故介宾之说，不可不知，而震亨是编，亦竟不可废焉。
〔亡名氏诸家名方〕《书录解题》二卷 佚失
陈振孙说：福建提举司所刊，市肆常货，而局方所未收者。
It is inevitable that doubts will spread and errors be inherited. Zhao Xibian also stated: During the Daguang era, an imperial edict ordered those proficient in medicine to publish and correct the pharmacy bureau's formularies, making additions and deletions. Thus, this book was not originally produced by Chen Shiwen and others; rather, after a printed edition existed following the Chongning era, Chen Shiwen undertook its revision based on it. Hence, the *Song Shi* (History of Song) titles it with "Corrected by Chen Shiwen."
[Enlarged and Corrected Heji Ju Fang] Five Volumes. Extant.
Regarding this book: In previous years, Lord Kawai Motonobu (Ding), a physician from Himeji, obtained it from a bookseller in Saikyo and presented it to my father. It is likely a Southern Song edition. Compared to the commonly circulated editions, it lacks sections below Dou Qing. Although there are additions from the Shaoxing era, they are not specifically marked. As for famous formulas from various schools, they do not bear the inscription "Enlarged by Wu Zhige," indicating that these were added during the Shaoxing era by Wu Zhige. However, this edition does not record his name, making it difficult to identify who "Wu Zhige" was. Furthermore, this edition is titled only "Enlarged and Corrected," lacking the characters "Taiping Huimin," which aligns with the records in *Dushu Zhi*. My younger brother Jian noted that both *Yuhai* and *Shulu Jieying* state that the old edition by Chen Shiwen and others contained 297 formulas across 21 categories. The currently circulating edition distinguishes between old Daguang formulas and later additions but contains two extra formulas, and the classification has been reduced to only 14 categories, obscuring its original form. Only in this edition is the content clear and distinguishable, matching citations in *Youyou Xinshu*, confirming its preservation of the original character. Detailed examination of *Yuhai* indicates that the mention of 21 categories includes the table of contents. In this edition, under the headings for "Various Wind," "All Qi," "Stubborn Cold," and "Women," there are no annotations for "Hong Kong Foot," "Spleen and Stomach," "Xiao Ke" (Wasting and Thirsting Syndrome), or "Childbirth Diagrams." The major and minor chapters total 21. However, there is a category for "Spleen and Stomach" treating post-typhoid conditions, which corresponds to additions in the Shaoxing era when compared to the circulating edition. If we assume no formulas are repeated, some differ slightly from the circulating edition. These include Shenling Yinzi (from Typhoid Various Schools Formulas), Sixiang Wan (from All Qi Various Schools Formulas), and Jiangqi Tang (from Various Decoctions Various Schools Formulas). Notably absent are Sijin Tiedan Heilong San (from Various Wind), Shen Shi Tang, Binghuang San (from Typhoid), Dingxiang Pi Ji Wan (from All Qi), Erchen Tang (from Phlegm-Fluids), Shuizhu Muxiang Wan, Fuhu Wan (from Diarrhea/Dysentery), Cunjin Wan, Duoming Dan (from Miscellaneous Diseases), Huadu Paimai Neibu Shiquan San, Moyao Jiangsheng Dan (from Sores and Swellings), Niuxi Tang, Jiwei Shangdan, Hupo Heilong Dan, Jiyin Dan, Hupo Heisan, Shuxiang San, Zhuru Tang (from Women), Renshen San, Qianshi Baizhu San (from Pediatrics), Qingyuan Xiang (from Fragrance Formulas), totaling 22 formulas. Additionally, within "All Qi," there are Yinggan Wan to Hongwanzi, totaling 13 formulas. Wuzhige Rushen Wan is separately listed under "Spleen and Stomach Disharmony." The Bureau's Mixiang Suhe Xiang Wan (from All Qi) and Wu Da Xianglian Wan (from Diarrhea/Dysentery) are within the Daguang formulas. Daguang Shengqi Tang (from All Qi) is in the Shaoxing section. Shaoxing Wenfei Tang (from Phlegm-Fluids), Daguang Qizao Tang (from Diarrhea/Dysentery), Chun Chunxue Gao (from Eyes), Pengsha San (from Throat), Baoqing Zhisheng Baoming Dan, Aiji Wan (from Pediatrics) are in the Various Schools Formulas section. These discrepancies in the circulating edition should be corrected. Furthermore, the Niuhuang Qingxin Wan in the circulating edition differs in the order of ingredients from Zhou Shi's *Zashi*. This edition does not follow that order. The first eight ingredients are Niuhuang (Calculus Bovis), Jinbo (Gold Leaf), Shexiang (Moschus), Xijiao (Rhino Horn - note: modern substitutes used), Xionghuang (Realgar), Longnao (Borneolum Syntheticum), Lingyangjiao (Saiga Antelope Horn), and Puhuang (Typhae Pollen). The subsequent 21 ingredients are identical to Dashanyao Wan, except for the presence of Huangqin (Scutellariae Radix) and the absence of Shu Dihuang (Rehmanniae Radix Preparata). This aligns with the account in *Zashi*. My late father once used these eight ingredients to treat stroke and convulsions, achieving remarkable results. Such matters are significant; therefore, ancient editions of medical formularies are highly valued.
[Commentary on Taiping Huimin Heji Ju Fang by Xu (Hong)] Lost.
The Preface states: Bencao (Materia Medica) is the root of medical practice, originating with the Yellow Emperor and Qibo, and reaching great maturity in our Song Dynasty. Although sages in antiquity achieved spiritual resonance and harmony with creation when initially formulating prescriptions, the roles of sovereign, minister, assistant, and courier drugs, their cold/heat/nature/toxicity, and their therapeutic targets—all derived from understanding their properties—are found within Bencao. How can later practitioners not study this carefully? Otherwise, textual transmission may lead to errors like drug misidentification (e.g., confusing Huangqin with similar herbs). The thermal nature of drugs differs vastly, akin to water and fire. Errors in dosage (e.g., mistaking one qian for one liang, or one fen for one jin) are common and often uncorrected. Ignoring opposing thermal natures and imbalanced quantities leads to errors of vast consequence. Using such prescriptions harms rather than helps. Even if prepared and administered according to symptoms, it is no different from exacerbating excess conditions or depleting deficiencies. Xu Hong has inherited his family's medical profession for three generations. Having reviewed all ancient and modern formularies, he finds *Taiping Huimin Heji Ju Fang* to be the most effective path. Regrettably, long transmission has distorted the text. In his spare time, Xu Hong carefully collated it against the Imperial Academy edition. To avoid accusations of personal bias, he annotated each ingredient based on various Bencao texts, hoping practitioners will study it daily and intuitively grasp the ancients' wisdom. This work aims to support the Emperor's benevolence toward the people and benefit future physicians. It also addresses varying disease depths and necessary formula modifications. He appended famous formulas from Wu Zhige and other bureau secret recipes to relevant sections and compiled the *Heji Zhinan Zonglun* as an introduction. He hopes to publish it but fears profit-driven publishers may repeat past errors. He entrusted the printing to the Ji Qing family for merit, wishing to preserve the text for the world. Bian Que and Cang Gong would surely approve of his efforts. Written on the Winter Solstice of the first year of Jiading (Wuchen year), Xu Hong, Instructor of Imperial Medicine, formerly inspecting the Huimin Bureau in Sichuan.
[General Discussion of the Guide to Taiping Huimin Heji Ju Fang] Three Volumes. Extant.
[Proposed Classification of Taiping Huimin Heji Ju Fang by Lu (Zuchang)] Lost.
This book has no surviving copies. Lu Zuchang frequently mentions it in his *Xu Yijian Fang*, suggesting it likely discussed syndrome differentiation and treatment formulas.
[Anonymous Enlarged Taiping Huimin Heji Ju Fang] Ten Volumes. Extant.
Zhu Yizun's Postscript states: *Taiping Huimin Heji Ju Fang* is recorded in Chao Shi's *Dushu Houzhi*, Chen Shi's *Shulu Jieying*, and *Song Yiwen Zhi* as five volumes. During the Daguang era, an edict ordered the correction of pharmacy formularies by Chen Shiwen, Director of the Ministry of Works, classifying them into 21 categories with 297 formulas. Thus, it was completed in Bianjing. Wang Yinglin's *Yuhai* notes four pharmacies were established, including the Heji Bureau. The transformation of the Shuyao Suo into the Taiping Huimin Bureau occurred in the 18th year of Shaoxing. The original corrected version by Chen Shiwen was indeed only five volumes. Later additions from Shaoxing, Baoqing, and Chunxi eras, along with formulas from Wu Zhige and other bureaus, expanded it to ten volumes. My family possesses a Yuan dynasty woodblock edition, appended with Xu Hong's *Zhinan* (three volumes), printed by the Rixin Hall of the Gao family in Jian'an.
The *Siku Quanshu* Summary states: *Taiping Huimin Heji Ju Fang* (10 vols.) and *Zhinan Zonglun* (3 vols.). Old titles attribute it to Chen Shiwen, etc., under imperial commission. Wang Yinglin's *Yuhai* confirms the Daguang edition had 5 volumes, 297 formulas, 21 categories. Chao Gongwu's *Dushu Zhi* mentions corrections and additions over a year. *Dushu Houzhi* refers to a 10-volume *Taiyi Ju Fang* from the Yuanfeng era, where expert doctors submitted effective secret recipes for testing and sale. Thus, the Daguang edition revised the Shen宗 era old edition, explaining Chao's remarks on correction. However, this extant edition has only 14 categories and 788 formulas. *Yuhai* records the renaming to Taiping Huimin Bureau in the 18th year of Shaoxing and the distribution of the Imperial Academy edition in the 21st year. Since this edition bears the name "Taiping Huimin," it is the Shaoxing Imperial Edition, not the original Daguang text. It contains further additions from Baoqing and Chunxi eras and the *Zhinan* commentary copied from *Tujing Bencao*. Chen Zhesun's *Shulu Jieying* notes frequent supplements, likely referring to this. Dai Liang's biography of Zhu Zhenheng mentions he studied the popular 297 formulas of Chen Shiwen and Pei Zongyuan but realized ancient formulas did not fit contemporary diseases perfectly, leading him to study *Suwen* and *Nanjing*. Zhu's learning came from Luo Zhidi, bridging Liu Wansu's school. While Liu emphasized purging fire, Zhu emphasized nourishing yin. Both addressed excess and deficiency respectively but shared origins. Zhu criticized the aromatic, drying, and hot drugs in *Ju Fang*, warning against damage to vital qi by Huangbai and Zhimu. Zhang Jingyue countered that *Ju Fang* contains cold treatments for heat syndromes (e.g., Taiping Wan, Wuji Wan) and warm treatments for cold, arguing against dismissing it entirely due to Zhu's critique. The *Siku* summary agrees that while Zhu's critique highlights issues, *Ju Fang* remains valuable, and Zhang's perspective is also necessary for comprehensive understanding.
Zhang Haipeng's Postscript notes: The Heji name originated in Chongning with seven bureaus. Shaoxing renamed the Shuyao Suo to Taiping Huimin Bureau, compiling formulas from Chongguan eras into 10 volumes, 14 categories, 788 formulas. This reflects additions up to Baoqing/Chunxi, differing from the original 297 Daguang formulas. This edition has 674 formulas (excluding specific non-formula items). It lacks the title *Zhinan* but includes *Tujing Bencao* and *Yaoxing Zonglun*. The discrepancy in formula count suggests further revisions by Chen and Pei or later editors. *Guixin Zazhi* notes the error in Niuhuang Qingxin Wan's composition (29 ingredients vs. actual 8+21). This edition shows 19 ingredients up to Puhuang, then 10 ending with Dry Yam, differing from *Guixin Zazhi*, proving it is a later re-edition. Despite Zhu Danxi's criticism, the formulas were refined by experts and offered to the court. They must have genuine benefits for the people. Copying errors exist, but one should not abandon food because of choking. I have proofread this copy multiple times to ensure accuracy before printing. I hope owners of ancient editions will help correct it. April, Yichou Year, Zhang Haipeng of Yushan.
Note: The Taiyi Ju Fang and Heji Ju Fang were distinct. The *Siku* summary incorrectly assuming this is a revision of the Shen宗 era old edition is a significant oversight.
[Annotated Taiping Huimin Heji Ju Fang] Ten Volumes. Extant.
Author unknown. Xu Hong's commentary originally covered only Wu Zhige's effective formulas and bureau secret recipes. This edition adds commentaries to new formulas from Baoqing and Chunxi eras, indicating it was continued by late Song scholars. The preface still bears Xu Hong's title.
[Discussion of Ju Fang by Zhu (Zhenheng)] One Volume. Extant.
Zhu Zhenheng stated: *Heji Ju Fang* allows patients to self-medicate without seeking doctors or preparing medicines, simply buying ready-made pills and powders. This benevolent intent is excellent. It has become standard practice for officials, physicians, and patients since the Song Dynasty. However, I have doubts. Ancient medicine required divine skill and adaptability ("Medicine is intention"). Collecting past effective formulas to treat infinite modern diseases is like carving a mark on a boat to find a sword (rigid application) or looking for a horse by picture (superficial matching). Accidental success is rare.
Zhang Jingyue responded: Although *Ju Fang* uses many warming/astringent drugs, it also treats excess heat/new pathogens with cold drugs (e.g., Taiping Wan, Wuji Wan, Xianglian Wan, Ruling Tang). Warm formulas like Zhenren Yangzang Tang are also present. Its use depends on the practitioner's judgment. It is unfair to dismiss it solely for using warming/astringent methods. It was compiled from submissions by expert doctors under imperial decree. While some embellishment may exist, true effective formulas are numerous. Zhu Danxi claimed hot drugs kill, but I observe cold drugs also cause harm. Wise practitioners should investigate deeply (*Jingyue Quanshu*).
*Siku Quanshu* Summary: *Ju Fang Fahui* by Zhu Zhenheng critiques *Heji Ju Fang* for lacking etiology and rigid structure, aiming to refute warming/tonifying and dryness-heat tendencies. Zhang Jingyue disagreed, noting the formula was finalized under Huizong (not Shen Zong as Zhu/Jingyue sometimes imply). Zhu's lineage traces back to Luo Zhidi and Liu Wansu (purging fire), whereas Zhu focused on nourishing yin. Zhang criticized the downstream effects of Liu/Zhu's school (overuse of bitter-cold Huangbai/Zhimu damaging qi) and advocated warming yang. While their metaphors differed, both held partial views. Both works are indispensable for comprehensive study.
[Various Schools Famous Formulas] Two Volumes (Recorded in *Shulu Jieying*). Lost.
Chen Zhesun noted: Published by the Fujian Provincial Transport Commission, sold in markets, containing formulas not included in *Ju Fang*.