胎前之病,如恶阻、胞阻、胎漏、堕胎等证是也,产后之病,
如血块、血晕等证是也,妇科书中已详,可毋备述。而其最要
述者,惟胎前产后用药宜慎。凡治胎前之病,必须保护其胎,古人虽有“有故无殒,亦无殒也,大积大聚,
其可犯也,衰其大半而止”之训,奈今人胶执“有故无殒”之句,一遇里积之证,恣意用攻,往往非伤其子,
即伤其母,盖缘忽略衰其大半之文耳。窃揣胎在腹中,一旦被邪盘踞,攻其邪则胎必损,安其胎必碍
乎邪,静而筹之,莫若攻下方中,兼以护胎为妥,此非违悖《内经》,实今人之气体,不及古人万一也。且
不但重病宜慎其药,即寻常小恙,亦要留心。如化痰之半夏,消食之神曲,宽胀之浓朴,清肠之槐花,凉血
之丹皮、茅根,去寒之干姜、桂、附,利湿之米仁、通、滑,截疟之草果、常山,皆为犯胎之品,最易误
投,医者可不儆惧乎!至于产后之病,尝见医家不分虚实,必用生化成方,感时邪者,重投古拜,体实者未
尝不可,虚者攻之而里益虚,散之而表益虚,虚虚之祸,即旋踵矣!又有一等病患信虚,医人信补,不分
虚实,开口便说丹溪治产后之法,每每大补气血,体虚者未尝不可,倘外有时邪者,得补益剧,内有恶露
者,得补弥留,双证迭加,不自知其用补之咎耳。要之胎前必须步步护胎,产后当分虚实而治,毫厘差谬,
性命攸关。惟望同志者,凡遇胎前产后之 ,用药勿宜孟浪,慎之慎之!
妊娠期间的疾病,如恶阻(妊娠呕吐)、胞阻(妊娠腹痛)、胎漏(妊娠期阴道少量出血)、堕胎(流产)等证候,在妇科书籍中已有详细记载,此处无需赘述。但其中最为关键的,在于妊娠和产后用药必须谨慎。
凡是治疗妊娠期的疾病,必须保护胎儿。古人虽然有“有故无殒,亦无殒也;大积大聚,其可犯也;衰其大半而止”的训诫,无奈现代人拘泥固执于“有故无殒”这一句话,一遇到里有积滞的病证,就肆意使用攻下法,往往不是伤了胎儿,就是伤了母体,这大概是因为忽略了“病邪去除大半就要停止”这一条文的原因。
我私下揣测,胎儿在腹中,一旦遭受邪气盘踞,攻击邪气则胎儿必然受损,安固胎儿则会阻碍祛除邪气,冷静思考之后,不如在攻下的方剂中,兼用护胎的药物为妥当,这并非违背《黄帝内经》,实在是因为现代人的体质,不及古人万分之一啊。
而且,不仅仅是重病需要谨慎用药,即使是寻常的小病,也要留心。例如化痰的半夏,消食的神曲,宽胀的厚朴,清肠的槐花,凉血的丹皮、白茅根,去寒的干姜、桂枝、附子,利湿的薏苡仁、通草、滑石,截疟的草果、常山,这些都是容易伤胎的药物,最容易误投,医生们难道不应当警惕畏惧吗!
至于产后的疾病,我曾见到一些医生不分虚实,必定使用生化汤这一成方。如果是感受时邪的患者,重用古方拜(此处原文可能有误,通常指代某种峻猛或特定方剂,结合语境理解为不当重用),体质强壮的人或许还可以,但对于虚弱的人,如果采用攻伐之法,里气会更加虚弱;采用发散之法,表气会更加虚弱,“虚其虚”的祸患,随即就会发生!
又有一类病患自认为身体虚弱,医生也盲目进补,不分虚实,开口便说朱丹溪治疗产后病的方法,每每大量补益气血。体质虚弱的人或许还可以,但如果外感时邪,得到补益后病情会加剧;内有恶露(产后余血浊液)滞留,得到补益后邪气会更加留恋不去。两种证候叠加,却不知道自己是用补药造成的过错。
总之,妊娠期必须步步小心保护胎儿,产后应当分辨虚实进行治疗,毫厘之间的差错,都关系到性命。只希望同道中人,凡遇到妊娠和产后的疾病,用药不要轻率鲁莽,一定要谨慎再谨慎!
Diseases during pregnancy, such as *Ezu* (pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting), *Baozu* (abdominal pain during pregnancy), *Tailou* (spotting during pregnancy), and *Tuotai* (miscarriage), are detailed in gynecological texts and need not be repeated here. However, the most critical point is that medication must be used with extreme caution during both pregnancy and the postpartum period.
When treating diseases during pregnancy, one must protect the fetus. Although ancient texts state, "If there is a cause (pathogen), there will be no destruction to the mother or the fetus; large accumulations and masses may be attacked, but stop when half of the pathogen has been eliminated," modern practitioners often rigidly adhere to the phrase "if there is a cause, there will be no destruction." Upon encountering internal accumulation, they recklessly use purgative methods, often injuring either the fetus or the mother. This is likely due to neglecting the instruction to "stop when half of the pathogen has been eliminated."
I speculate that once pathogens occupy the space within the womb, attacking the pathogens damages the fetus, while protecting the fetus hinders the elimination of pathogens. After careful consideration, it is advisable to combine fetal protection measures within the formula used for attacking pathogens. This does not contradict the *Huangdi Neijing* (Yellow Emperor's Inner Canon); rather, it reflects that contemporary constitutions are far inferior to those of the ancients.
Moreover, caution is required not only for severe illnesses but also for minor ailments. For instance, *Banxia* (Pinelliae Rhizoma) for resolving phlegm, *Shenqu* (Massa Medicata Fermentata) for digesting food, *Houpo* (Magnoliae Officinalis Cortex) for relieving distension, *Huaihua* (Flos Sophorae) for clearing the intestines, *Danpi* (Moutan Cortex) and *Maogen* (Imperatae Rhizoma) for cooling blood, *Ganjiang* (Zingiberis Rhizoma), *Guizhi* (Cinnamomi Ramulus), and *Fuzi* (Aconiti Lateralis Radix Praeparata) for dispelling cold, *Yiyiren* (Coicis Semen), *Tongcao* (Tetrapanacis Medulla), and *Huashi* (Talcum) for promoting diuresis, and *Caoguo* (Tsao-ko Fructus) and *Changshan* (Dichroae Radix) for arresting malaria, are all substances that can harm the fetus. They are easily misused; should physicians not be vigilant and fearful?
Regarding postpartum diseases, I have observed physicians failing to distinguish between deficiency and excess syndromes, invariably prescribing *Shenghua Tang* (Decoction for Generating Blood). If the patient suffers from exogenous pathogens, heavy reliance on ancient formulas (such as *Baibai*, potentially referring to specific strong formulations or a textual error for a specific herb/formula contextually implying harsh treatment) may be acceptable for robust individuals, but for deficient patients, using attack methods further depletes the interior, and using dispersal methods further weakens the exterior. The disaster of "depleting the deficient" occurs immediately!
Furthermore, there are cases where patients believe themselves to be deficient, and doctors blindly prescribe tonics, ignoring the distinction between deficiency and excess. They cite Zhu Danxi’s methods for postpartum care, frequently using heavy tonification of Qi and Blood. While this might suit truly deficient bodies, if exogenous pathogens are present, tonification exacerbates the condition; if lochia (postpartum discharge) remains internally, tonification causes the pathogen to linger. With dual complications arising, the physician fails to recognize the fault of using tonics.
In summary, during pregnancy, one must step-by-step protect the fetus; during the postpartum period, treatment must differentiate between deficiency and excess. A discrepancy of a hair's breadth concerns life and death. I hope colleagues, when encountering conditions during pregnancy or the postpartum period, will avoid rash medication practices. Exercise utmost caution!