经曰∶亢则害,承乃制,制则生化,外列盛衰,害则败乱,生化大病。此数句,前人解说极多,能会经旨
者殊少。详其文意,当云∶亢则害,害则败乱,生化大病;承乃制,制则生化,外列盛衰。只作两下解之为是。
夫天地之间,五类生化,互有所胜,互有所制,地气制己胜,天气制胜己,此以地气之制己胜者言之也。夫六
气之用,各归其所不胜而为化,故太阴雨化施于太阳,太阳寒化施于少阴,少阴热化施于阳明,阳明燥化施于
厥阴,厥阴风化施于太阴,此地之四方,分为六步以应天外六节气令之治者也。天地之气,互为盈虚,恶所不
胜,归所同和,同者盛之,异者衰之,当其位则盛,非其位则衰。地气左迁于中,天气右行于外,内外相因,
盛衰相倚,故曰外列盛衰也。若夫亢则伤害,己胜不受胜己者之施化,于是有胜则有复,胜复更作,败乱生化
之常。故上胜则天气降而下,下胜则地气迁而上,甚则易位,气交易,则大变生而病作矣。所谓害则败乱,生
化大病者是也。此一胜一制,一正一变之异化也。河间云∶亢则害承者之母气,于是承者乃起而制之,是知有
非位之胜复,而不知制则生化外列盛衰,为当位之正化也。楼氏云∶火亢则害,水承乃制之,制生则化。至冬
着盛,是以夏之暑生冬之寒化,以冬之寒制夏之暑亢,恐不相反之甚,是知有当位之正化,而不知害则败乱,
生化大病,为非位之胜复也。安可即以今日既亢之乖气,复为后日得制之平气耶?殊不知亢制字义甚明,言亢
则非平,言制则非亢矣。生化盛衰,乃当位之常,败乱生化,乃非位之变也。二家全不分别,何也?
The *Classic* states: "When qi is in a state of hyperactivity (Kang), it causes harm; when there is succession (Cheng), there is control (Zhi); when controlled, transformation and generation occur, manifesting externally as prosperity and decline; when harmed, disorder ensues, leading to severe disease from disrupted transformation." Regarding these sentences, predecessors have provided numerous interpretations, yet few can truly grasp the purport of the classic. Upon detailed examination of the textual meaning, it should be understood as: "Hyperactivity causes harm, harm leads to disorder, resulting in severe disease from disrupted transformation"; and "Succession brings control, control enables transformation, manifesting externally as prosperity and decline." It is correct to interpret this as two distinct aspects.
Within heaven and earth, the transformation and generation of the five categories of things involve mutual overcoming and mutual restraint. "Earthly qi restrains what it overcomes; Heavenly qi restrains what overcomes it." This statement refers to earthly qi restraining what it overcomes. The functions of the Six Qi (Wind, Cold, Summer-Heat, Dampness, Dryness, Fire) each return to their position of being overcome (the element that controls them) for transformation. Thus, Taiyin's damp transformation acts upon Taiyang; Taiyang's cold transformation acts upon Shaoyin; Shaoyin's heat transformation acts upon Yangming; Yangming's dry transformation acts upon Jueyin; Jueyin's wind transformation acts upon Taiyin. This divides the four directions of the earth into six steps to correspond with the governance of the six seasonal qi commands outside heaven.
Heavenly and earthly qi mutually wax and wane. They abhor what they cannot overcome and return to what harmonizes with them. What is similar prospers; what is different declines. When in its proper position, it prospers; when not in its proper position, it declines. Earthly qi migrates leftward within the center, while heavenly qi moves rightward on the exterior. Interior and exterior cause each other; prosperity and decline rely on each other. Hence, it is said that "prosperity and decline are manifested externally."
As for hyperactivity causing harm: if the overcome qi does not accept the transformative influence of the qi that overcomes it, then there is an excess (Sheng), followed by a counteraction (Fu). Excess and counteraction alternate, disrupting the normal order of transformation and generation. Therefore, if the upper part has excess, heavenly qi descends; if the lower part has excess, earthly qi ascends. In severe cases, positions are exchanged. When qi exchanges positions, major changes arise, and disease occurs. This is what is meant by "when harmed, disorder ensues, leading to severe disease from disrupted transformation." This represents the difference between one excess and one control, or one normal and one aberrant transformation.
Liu Hejian (Liu Wansu) stated: "Hyperactivity is harm; the successor is the mother qi of the successor. Thus, the successor arises to control it." This understanding recognizes non-proper positional excess and counteraction but fails to recognize that "controlled transformation generates, manifesting externally as prosperity and decline," which constitutes proper positional normal transformation.
Lou Ying (the author) stated: "If fire is hyperactive, it causes harm; water succeeds and controls it. Control generates transformation. By winter, cold is abundant. Thus, summer heat generates winter cold, using winter cold to control summer heat hyperactivity. Is this not excessively contrary?" This understanding recognizes proper positional normal transformation but fails to recognize that "harm leads to disorder, leading to severe disease from disrupted transformation," which constitutes non-proper positional excess and counteraction. How can one equate today's already hyperactive and deviant qi with tomorrow's balanced qi after control? One must not fail to realize that the meanings of "hyperactivity" and "control" are clear: "Hyperactivity" implies imbalance, while "Control" implies the cessation of hyperactivity. Prosperity and decline in transformation are the norms of proper positioning; disorder and disruption of transformation are the variations of improper positioning. Why do these two schools completely fail to distinguish between them?