尝读张仲景伤寒论。于太阴有曰。自利不渴者。属太阴。以其脏有寒故也。当温之。宜服四
逆。于少阴有曰。少阴病。得之一二日。口中和。其背恶寒者。当灸之。附子汤主之。少阴
病。身体痛。手足寒。骨节痛。脉沉者。附子汤主之。少阴病下利。白通汤主之。少阴病
下利。脉微者。与白通汤。利不止。厥逆无脉。干呕烦者。白通加猪胆汁汤主之。少阴下利
清谷。里寒外热。手足厥逆。脉微欲绝。身反不恶寒。其人面赤色。或腹痛。或干呕。或咽
痛。或利止脉不出者。通脉四逆汤主之。少阴病脉沉者。急温之。宜四逆汤。于厥阴有曰。
手足厥寒。脉细欲绝者。当归四逆汤主之。大汗。若大下利。而厥冷者。四逆汤主之。观仲景
此论。则伤寒三阴。必有寒证。而宜用温热之剂也。及读刘守真之书。有曰。伤寒邪热在表
。腑病为阳。邪热在里。脏病为阴。俗妄谓有寒热阴阳异证。误人久矣。寒病有矣。非汗病
之谓也。寒病止为杂病。终莫能为汗病。且造化汗液之气者。乃阳热之气。非阴寒之所能
也
。虽仲景有四逆汤证。是治表热里和。误以寒药下之太早。表热入里。下利不止。及或表热
里寒自利。急以四逆温里。利止里和。急解其表也。故仲景四逆汤证。复有承气汤下之者。
由
是伤寒汗病。经直言热病。而不言寒也。经言三阴证者。邪热。在脏。在里。以脏与里。为
阴。当下热者也。素问论伤寒热病有二。篇名曰热。竟无寒理。兼素问并灵枢诸篇。运气造
化
之理推之。则为热病。诚非寒也。观守真此论。则伤寒无问在表在里。与夫三阳三阴。
皆
一于为热。而决无或寒者矣。两说不同。其是非之判。必有一居此者。由是彼此反复究诘
其义。而久不能得。虽至神疲气耗。不舍置者。自谓此是伤寒大纲领。此义不明。则千言万
语。皆未足以为后学式。况戕贼民生。何有穷极也哉。意谓成无己之注。必有所发明者。遂
因而求之。然亦止是随文而略释之。竟不明言何由为热。何由为寒之故。此非其不欲言也。
盖止知伤寒。皆是传经。故疑于六经所传。俱为热证。而热无变寒之理。遂不敢别白耳。以
寒为本脏之寒欤。安得当热邪传里入深之时。反独见寒。而不见热者。且所用温热药。能不
助传经之热邪乎。以寒为外邪之寒欤。则在三阳以成热矣。岂有传至三阴。而反为寒哉。成
氏能潜心乎此。则必悟其所以然矣。自仲景作伤寒论以来。靡或遗之而弗宗。至于异同之论
兴。而渔者走渊。木者走山矣。宜乎后人不能决于似是而非之际。故或谓今世并无真伤寒
病。又或以为今人所得之病。俱是内伤。又昧者。至谓伤寒论中诸温药。悉为传经热邪而用
者。以三阴经属阴故也。又其太谬者。则曰。论中凡有寒字。皆当作热字看。呜呼。末流
之弊。一至此乎。于是澄心静虑以涵泳之。一旦划然若有所悟者。然亦未敢必其当否也。姑
陈之以从有道之正。夫三阳之病。其寒邪之在太阳也。寒郁其阳。阳不畅而成热。阳虽人身
之正 气。既郁则为邪矣。用麻黄发表。以逐其寒。则腠理通。而郁热泄。故汗而愈。苟或
不汗不解。其热不得外泄。则必里入。故传阳明。传少阳。而或入腑也。若夫三阴之病。则
或寒或热者。何哉。盖寒邪之伤人也。或有在太阳经郁热。然后以次而传至阴经者。或有太
阳不传阳明少阳。而便传三阴经者。或有寒邪不从阳经。而始直伤阴经者。或有虽从太阳。
而始不及郁热。即入少阴。而独见少阴证者。或有始自太阳。即入少阴。而太阳不能以无伤
者。或有直伤即入。而寒便变热。及始寒而终热者。其郁热传阴。与变便变热。则为热证。
其直伤阴经。及从太阳即入少阴。则为寒证。其太阳不能无伤。则少阴脉证。而兼见太阳标
病。其始为寒。而终变热。则先见寒证。而后见热证。此三阴之病。所以或寒或热也。苟
即三阴经篇诸条。展转玩绎以求之。理斯出矣。夫其或传经。或直伤。或即入。或先寒后热
者。何也。邪气暴卒。本无定情。而传变不常故耳。故经曰。邪之中人也无有常。或中于阳
。或中于阴。夫守真者。绝类离伦之士也。岂好为异说。以骇人哉。盖由其以温暑为伤寒。
而仲景之方。每不与温暑对。故略乎温热之剂。而例用寒凉。由其以伤寒一断为热而无寒
。故
谓仲景四逆汤。为寒药误下。表热里和之证。及为表热里寒。自利之证。而立。又谓温里止
利。急解其表。又谓寒病止为杂病。嗟乎。仲景伤寒论。专为中而即病之伤寒作。不兼为不
即病之温暑作。故每有三阴之寒证。而温热之剂之所以用也。以病则寒以时。则寒其用之也
固宜。后人不知此意。是以愈求愈远。愈说愈凿。若知此意。则犹庖丁解牛。动中肯綮矣。
且如寒药误下。而成里寒者。固不为不无矣。不因寒药误下。而自为里寒者。其可谓之必无
乎。殊不知阴经之每见寒证者。本由寒邪不由阳经。直伤于此。与夫虽由太阳。而始不及
郁
热。即入于此而致也。虽或有因寒药误下而致者。盖亦甚少。仲景所用诸温热之剂。何尝每
为寒药误下而立。况表里寒之证。亦何尝每有急解其表之文乎。夫里寒外热之证。乃是寒邪
入客于内。迫阳于外。或者虚阳之气。自作外热之状耳。非真热邪所为也。观仲景于里寒外
热之证。但以温药治里寒。而不治外热。则知其所以为治之
意矣。若果当急解其表。岂不于里和之后。明言之乎。且三阴寒病。既是杂病
。何故亦载于伤寒论。以惑后人乎。其厥阴病篇诸条之上。又何故每以伤寒二字冠之乎。夫
内经所叙三阴病。一于为热者。言其常也。仲景所叙三阴病。兼乎寒热者。言其变也。并
行而不相悖耳。后人谓伤寒本无寒证。得非知常而不知变欤。然世之恪守局方。好用温热剂
者。乃反能每全干寒证无他。其守彼虽偏。治此则是。学人能知三阴。固有寒邪所为之证。则
仲景创法之本意。可以了然于心目之间。而不为他说所夺矣。或曰。伤寒之病。必从阳经郁
热。而传三阴今子谓直伤阴经。即入阴经。而为寒证。其何据乎。予曰。据夫仲景耳。仲景
曰。病发热恶寒者。发于阳也。无热恶寒者。发于阴也。发于阳者。七日愈。发于阴者。六
日愈。夫谓之无热恶寒。则知其非阳经之郁热矣。谓之发于阴。则知其不从阳经传至此矣。
谓之六日愈。则知其不始太阳。而止自阴经发病之日。为始数之矣。仲景又曰。伤寒一二日
。至四五日。而厥者。必发热。伤寒病厥五日。热亦五日。设六日当复厥。不厥者。自愈。
伤寒厥四日。热反三日。复厥五日。其病为进。夫得伤寒未为热。即为厥者。岂亦由传经
入深之热邪。而致此乎。今世人多有始得病时。便见诸寒证。而并无或热者。此则直伤阴经
。即入阴经者也。苟不能究夫仲景之心。但执凡伤于寒。则为病热之语以为治。其不夭人天
年者。几希矣。
I once read Zhang Zhongjing's *Treatise on Cold Damage Diseases* (*Shanghan Lun*). In the section on Taiyin disease, it states: "Spontaneous diarrhea without thirst belongs to Taiyin. This is because there is cold in the zang organs. It should be treated with warming methods; Sini Decoction (Four Reversal Decoction) is appropriate." In the section on Shaoyin disease, it states: "Shaoyin disease, developing within one or two days, with a normal mouth and tongue, and aversion to cold on the back, should be treated with moxibustion; Fuzi Tang (Aconite Decoction) governs it." "Shaoyin disease, with body pain, cold hands and feet, bone and joint pain, and a deep pulse, is governed by Fuzi Tang." "Shaoyin disease with diarrhea is governed by Baitong Tang (White Tongue Decoction)." "In Shaoyin disease with diarrhea and a faint pulse, administer Baitong Tang; if diarrhea does not stop, accompanied by reversal cold, absence of pulse, dry retching, and irritability, Baitong Jia Zhuyedanhuang Tang (Baitong Decoction plus Pig Gallbladder Bile Decoction) governs it." "Shaoyin with clear undigested food in stool, internal cold with external heat, cold hands and feet, pulse faint and nearly absent, yet the body shows no aversion to cold, and the person has a red face, or abdominal pain, or dry retching, or sore throat, or diarrhea stops but pulse does not emerge, is governed by Tongmai Sini Tang (Pulse-Resuscitating Sini Decoction)." "In Shaoyin disease with a deep pulse, urgently warm it; Sini Tang is appropriate." In the section on Jueyin disease, it states: "Cold hands and feet with a fine and nearly absent pulse are governed by Danggui Sini Tang (Angelica Sinensis Decoction for Reversal Cold)." "After profuse sweating, or severe purgation, resulting in cold extremities, Sini Tang governs it." Observing these discussions by Zhang Zhongjing, it follows that the Three Yin diseases (Taiyin, Shaoyin, Jueyin) of cold damage must have cold syndromes and are suitable for treatment with warming agents.
Later, when I read the works of Liu Wansu (courtesy name Shouzhen), he stated: "When pathogenic heat from cold damage is in the exterior, fu organ diseases are Yang; when pathogenic heat is in the interior, zang organ diseases are Yin. The vulgar erroneously claim there are distinct syndromes of cold, heat, Yin, and Yang, misleading people for a long time. Cold diseases exist, but they do not refer to 'Han Bing' (the generalized term for febrile diseases transmitted via sweating). Cold diseases belong only to miscellaneous diseases and can never constitute 'Han Bing'. Moreover, the qi that generates sweat in nature is Yang-heat qi, not something Yin-cold can produce." Although Zhang Zhongjing has indications for Sini Tang, those are for treating cases where exterior heat exists with interior harmony, but were mistakenly treated too early with cold-purgative herbs, causing exterior heat to enter the interior and resulting in persistent diarrhea; or for cases of self-induced diarrhea due to exterior heat and interior cold, requiring urgent warming of the interior with Sini Tang. Once diarrhea stops and interior harmony is restored, the exterior syndrome should be urgently resolved. Thus, after indications for Sini Tang in Zhang Zhongjing's work, there are instances of using Chengqi Tang (Descending Qi Decoction) for purgation. Therefore, the Classics explicitly state that cold damage is a heat disease, not a cold one. The Three Yin syndromes mentioned in the Classics refer to pathogenic heat residing in the zang organs and the interior; since zang organs and the interior are Yin, purging the heat is required. The *Suwen* discusses cold damage febrile diseases in two chapters, both titled "Re" (Heat), containing no theory on cold. Inferring from the principles of fate and transformation in various chapters of the *Suwen* and *Lingshu*, these are indeed heat diseases, certainly not cold. Observing Liu Shouzhen's arguments, it follows that cold damage, regardless of whether the pathogen is in the exterior or interior, and whether it involves the Three Yang or Three Yin, is uniformly a heat syndrome, absolutely devoid of cold.
These two theories differ. In judging right from wrong, one must be correct. Thus, I repeatedly investigated and questioned the meanings of both sides, unable to reach a conclusion for a long time, becoming so exhausted in spirit and energy that I could not let go. I considered this to be the general principle of cold damage. If this principle is unclear, then thousands of words are insufficient as models for later learners, let alone the endless harm inflicted upon people's lives. I thought that Cheng Wuji's commentary must have some insights, so I sought answers through his text. However, he merely explained briefly along with the text, never explicitly stating why there is heat or why there is cold. This was not because he did not want to say it, but likely because he believed that cold damage always involves transmission through the meridians, leading him to suspect that all transmissions through the Six Meridians result in heat syndromes, and that heat cannot transform into cold. Hence, he dared not distinguish them. If cold is inherent to the zang organs, how can it appear exclusively as cold, without heat, when hot pathogens transmit deeply into the interior? Furthermore, would the use of warming herbs not aid the transmitting heat pathogens? If cold is an external pathogenic factor, it would have already transformed into heat in the Three Yang meridians. How could it become cold upon reaching the Three Yin meridians? If Cheng Shi had pondered this deeply, he would surely have realized the reason.
Since Zhang Zhongjing wrote the *Treatise on Cold Damage Diseases*, no one has neglected it without revering it. Until debates on similarities and differences arose, like fishermen rushing to the abyss and woodcutters to the mountains (indicating straying from the true path), it is no wonder later generations could not decide at the ambiguous juncture. Thus, some claimed there are no true cold damage diseases in the current era; others argued that diseases contracted today are all internal injuries; and ignorant individuals went so far as to say that all warming medicines in the *Treatise* are used for heat pathogens transmitted through meridians because the Three Yin meridians belong to Yin. Even more absurd was the claim that every instance of the character "cold" in the treatise should be read as "heat". Alas! Have the drawbacks of degeneration reached such a point? I then cleared my mind and contemplated deeply. One day, it suddenly became clear as if I had gained enlightenment, though I dared not assert its correctness. I tentatively present it here for correction by those who possess the Way.
Regarding the diseases of the Three Yang, when cold pathogens reside in the Taiyang meridian, cold constrains Yang qi, which becomes unsmooth and transforms into heat. Although Yang qi is the righteous qi of the human body, once constrained, it becomes pathogenic. Using Mahuang Tang (Ephedra Decoction) to release the exterior and expel cold allows the couli (pores) to open and constrained heat to vent, resulting in cure through sweating. If sweating does not resolve the condition, the heat cannot vent outward and must enter the interior. Thus, it transmits to Yangming or Shaoyang, or enters the fu organs. As for the diseases of the Three Yin, why are some cold and some heat? Generally, when cold pathogens injure the human body, sometimes heat is constrained in the Taiyang meridian before sequentially transmitting to the Yin meridians; sometimes Taiyang does not transmit to Yangming or Shaoyang but directly transmits to the Three Yin meridians; sometimes cold pathogens do not start from the Yang meridians but directly injure the Yin meridians; sometimes although starting from Taiyang, heat is not yet constrained, and it immediately enters Shaoyin, showing only Shaoyin syndromes; sometimes starting from Taiyang, it immediately enters Shaoyin, while Taiyang is still injured; sometimes direct injury leads immediately to entry, and cold transforms into heat, or starts as cold and ends as heat. Those resulting from constrained heat transmitting to Yin, or transforming from cold to heat, are heat syndromes. Those directly injuring the Yin meridians, or entering Shaoyin immediately from Taiyang, are cold syndromes. When Taiyang cannot avoid injury, Shaoyin pulse and syndromes will co-occur with Taiyang manifest symptoms. When starting as cold and eventually transforming into heat, cold syndromes appear first, followed by heat syndromes. This is why the diseases of the Three Yin are sometimes cold and sometimes heat. If one carefully studies and interprets the various clauses in the Three Yin meridian chapters, the principles will emerge.
Why are there cases of transmission, direct injury, immediate entry, or initial cold followed by heat? This is because pathogens strike violently and suddenly, lacking fixed patterns, and their transmission and transformation are irregular. Thus, the Classics state: "Pathogens invading humans have no constancy; some invade Yang, some invade Yin." Liu Shouzhen was a scholar of exceptional caliber. Did he enjoy proposing heterodox theories to shock people? Probably because he categorized Warm Disease and Summerheat as Cold Damage, and Zhang Zhongjing's formulas often did not correspond to Warm Disease and Summerheat, he overlooked warming agents and universally employed cold-cooling herbs. Because he judged all cold damage as heat without cold, he claimed that Zhang Zhongjing's Sini Tang was established for cases where cold herbs were mistakenly used to purge, leaving exterior heat with interior harmony, or for cases of exterior heat with interior cold causing self-diarrhea. He further stated that after warming the interior to stop diarrhea, the exterior should be urgently resolved. He also claimed cold diseases belong only to miscellaneous diseases. Alas! Zhang Zhongjing's *Treatise on Cold Damage Diseases* was specifically composed for "Shanghan" (cold damage occurring immediately upon exposure to cold), not for "Wenshu" (warm diseases and summerheat occurring after a latent period). Therefore, there are frequently cold syndromes in the Three Yin, which explains the use of warming agents. Since the disease is cold and the season is cold, using warming agents is indeed appropriate. Later generations, unaware of this meaning, seek further away and argue more rigidly. If they understood this, it would be like Cook Ding carving an ox, moving precisely at the joints.
Moreover, while cases of interior cold caused by mistaken purgation with cold herbs certainly exist, can we say that interior cold arising spontaneously without such mistake is impossible? Little do they know that the frequent appearance of cold syndromes in the Yin meridians originally stems from cold pathogens directly injuring these meridians without passing through the Yang meridians, or from Taiyang failing to constrain heat before immediately entering these meridians. Although some may result from mistaken purgation with cold herbs, this is rare. Were the various warming agents used by Zhang Zhongjing established solely for mistaken purgation? Furthermore, in cases of exterior-interior cold-heat syndromes, is there ever mention of urgently resolving the exterior? The syndrome of interior cold with external heat occurs when cold pathogens invade internally, forcing Yang qi to the exterior, or when deficient Yang qi manifests as external heat itself, not true pathogenic heat. Observing that Zhang Zhongjing treats interior cold with warming herbs without addressing the external heat in such cases reveals his therapeutic intent. If urgent resolution of the exterior were truly indicated, would he not clearly state it after the interior harmonizes? Moreover, if Three Yin cold diseases were merely miscellaneous diseases, why are they recorded in the *Treatise on Cold Damage Diseases* to confuse later generations? Why do the clauses in the Jueyin chapter each begin with the word "Shanghan" (Cold Damage)?
The *Neijing* describes Three Yin diseases as uniformly heat, stating the norm. Zhang Zhongjing describes Three Yin diseases as including both cold and heat, stating the variation. They run parallel without contradiction. Later generations claiming cold damage originally has no cold syndromes fail to understand variation despite knowing the norm. However, those in the world who strictly adhere to the *Formulary of the Bureau* and favor warming agents can often preserve patients with cold syndromes without other issues. Their adherence is biased, but their treatment of this specific aspect is correct. If students of medicine understand that Three Yin diseases inherently include syndromes caused by cold pathogens, the original intent behind Zhang Zhongjing's created methods can be clearly understood, preventing deviation by other theories.
Someone asked: "Diseases of cold damage must involve constrained heat in Yang meridians before transmitting to Three Yin. Now you claim direct injury to Yin meridians leads to immediate entry and cold syndromes. What is your evidence?" I replied: "Based on Zhang Zhongjing. Zhang Zhongjing said: 'Diseases with fever and aversion to cold originate in Yang; diseases without fever and with aversion to cold originate in Yin. Those originating in Yang heal in seven days; those originating in Yin heal in six days.' Calling it 'no fever and aversion to cold' indicates it is not constrained heat in Yang meridians. Calling it 'originating in Yin' indicates it did not transmit from Yang meridians. Calling it 'heals in six days' indicates it did not start in Taiyang, but counting begins from the day the disease manifested in the Yin meridians." Zhang Zhongjing also said: "In cold damage, from one or two days to four or five days, if reversal cold occurs, fever must follow. If reversal cold lasts five days, fever also lasts five days. If on the sixth day reversal cold returns, but does not, the patient heals. If reversal cold lasts four days, fever lasts three days, and reversal cold returns for five days, the disease progresses." Getting cold damage without fever, presenting immediately with reversal cold, could this be caused by heat pathogens transmitting deeply? Nowadays, many people present with various cold syndromes from the onset, with no heat whatsoever. This is direct injury to Yin meridians and immediate entry. If one cannot fathom Zhang Zhongjing's mind but执 (clings) to the saying that all cold damage results in heat diseases for treatment, few will avoid premature death.