从来肿病,遍身头面俱肿,尚易治。若只单单腹肿,则为难治。此其间有所以然之故,
不可
不辨也。盖传世诸方,皆是悍毒急攻之法,耗损真元,亏伤脾胃,可一而不可再。用药纵取
效于一时,倘再腹肿,则更无法可用矣!且遍身俱肿者,五脏六腑各有现证,故泻肝泻肺泻
膀胱大小肠之药,间有取效之时。而单单腹胀,则中州之地久窒其四运之轴,而清者不升,
浊者不降,互相聚结,牢不可破,实因脾气衰微所致。而泻脾之药,尚敢漫用乎?且肿病之
可泻者,但可施之西北盛壮之人,及田野农夫之流,岂膏粱老少之所能受?设谓肿病概可用
之,大满大实,必从乎泻,而病后肿与产后肿,亦将泻之耶?且古方原载肿病五不治∶唇
黑伤肝,缺盆平伤心,脐突伤脾,背平伤肺,足底平伤肾,此五者不可治矣。是其立方之意
,非皆为不可治之证而设,后人不察,概从攻泻者何耶?所以凡用劫夺之药者,其始非不遽
消,其后攻之不消矣,其后再攻之如铁石矣。不知者观之,方谓何物邪气?若此之盛,自明
者观之,不过为猛药所攻而致。觉此身之元气,转于此身为难者,直有驱良民为寇之弊,所
谓亦子盗兵,弄于潢池 其然乎?明乎此,则有培养一法,补益元气是也;则有招纳一法,
升阳举气是也,则有解散一法,开鬼门洁净府是也。三法俱不言泻,而泻在其中矣,无余蕴
矣。
Historically, edema affecting the entire body and face is relatively easy to treat. However, if only the abdomen is swollen, it becomes difficult to treat. There are underlying reasons for this distinction that must be analyzed.
The various prescriptions handed down through generations mostly employ harsh, toxic, and rapid purgative methods. These deplete the True Yuan (True Original Qi) and damage the Spleen and Stomach. Such approaches can be used once but never repeated. Even if medication achieves temporary efficacy, if abdominal swelling recurs, there will be no further effective treatment available!
Furthermore, in cases of generalized edema, each of the Five Zang and Six Fu organs presents specific signs. Therefore, herbs that drain the Liver, Lung, Bladder, Large Intestine, or Small Intestine may occasionally yield results. In contrast, isolated abdominal distension indicates that the central region (Spleen and Stomach) has long obstructed the axis of movement for Qi transformation. As a result, Clear Qi fails to ascend, and Turbid Qi fails to descend; they accumulate and bind together, becoming firm and unbreakable. This is fundamentally caused by the decline and weakness of Spleen Qi. How dare one casually use herbs that drain the Spleen?
Moreover, edema suitable for purgation should only be applied to robust individuals from the Northwest or laborers in the fields. Could those who enjoy rich diets, particularly the elderly and children, withstand such treatments? If one claims that all edema can be treated with purgatives, then certainly cases of fullness and excess must be drained. But what about postpartum edema or edema following illness? Should these also be treated with purgation?
Ancient texts originally listed five untreatable conditions for edema: black lips indicate injury to the Liver; a flat suprasternal fossa (Quepen) indicates injury to the Heart; protruding umbilicus indicates injury to the Spleen; a flat back indicates injury to the Lung; and flat soles indicate injury to the Kidney. These five conditions are considered incurable. The intent behind formulating these rules was not merely to declare cases incurable, yet why do later generations, without careful examination, universally resort to purgative attacks?
Consequently, when using drugs that劫夺 (plunder/rob) Zheng Qi (Upright Qi), the swelling may initially subside rapidly. However, subsequent attempts at purgation fail to reduce the swelling, and further attacks render the condition as hard as iron or stone. Those ignorant of medicine might ask, "What pathogenic factor is so formidable?" But those with insight understand that this is merely the consequence of aggressive drug therapy. It feels as though the body's Yuan Qi is being turned against itself, creating difficulties. This is akin to driving common people into banditry, described metaphorically as "the son stealing soldiers' arms to rebel in the pond." Is this not the case?
Understanding this principle reveals three alternative methods: the method of nurturing, which involves tonifying and benefiting Yuan Qi; the method of gathering, which involves raising Yang Qi and lifting Qi; and the method of dispersing, which involves opening the "ghost gates" (inducing sweating) and cleansing the "clean mansion" (promoting urination). None of these three methods explicitly mention "purgation," yet the goal of resolving swelling is achieved within them, leaving no room for further improvement.