麝香,味辛,气温,无毒。辟蛇虺,诛蛔虫、虫蛊痫疰,杀鬼精,殴疫瘴,胀急痞满咸
消,
催生堕胎,通关利窍,除恍惚惊怖,镇心安神,疗痈肿疮疽,蚀脓逐血,吐风痰,启寐魇,
点目去膜止泪。亦外治居多,而内治甚少也。
或问麝香能消水果之伤,然乎?曰∶麝香何能消水果,但能杀果木之虫耳。食果过多,
胸中
未有不生虫者也。生虫则必思果,思果则必多食果矣,初食之而快,久食之而闷。前人用麝
香,而食果之病痊,遂疑麝香之能消果也,谁知是杀虫之效哉。(〔批〕解前人之惑。)
或问近人治风症,多用麝香以透彻内外,而吾子不谈,岂治风非欤?曰∶风病不同,有
入于
骨者,有入于皮肉者,有入于脏腑者,未可一概用麝香而走窜之也,盖风入于骨髓者,不得
已而用麝香,使攻邪之药直入于骨髓,祛风而外出,此治真正中风也。其余风邪不过在脏腑
之外、肌肉之间,使亦用麝香引风入骨,反致变生大病而不可救药矣。至于世人不知禁忌,
妄用麝香,以治小儿急、慢之惊,往往九死一生,可不慎哉。
或疑麝香既不可以治风病,而前人用之,岂皆非欤?曰∶前人用麝香以治风症者,不过
借其
香窜之气,以引入经络,开其所闭之关也。近人不知前人立方本意,毋论关闭、关开,而一
概皆用,以致引风入骨,使风之不出,无风而成风症,为可憎耳。
Musk (Shexiang, 麝香), with a pungent flavor and warm temperature, is non-toxic. It repels snakes and scorpions, eliminates roundworms, parasites, epilepsy, and *zhuzheng* (疰病, infectious diseases characterized by lingering symptoms), drives away evil spirits, wards off epidemic miasma, resolves distension, urgency, and fullness/stagnation, induces labor and causes abortion, opens orifices and unblocks passages, dispels trance-like states and fright, calms the heart and anchors the spirit, treats carbuncles and sores, erodes pus and expels blood stasis, vomits out wind-phlegm, awakens from nightmares, and when applied to the eyes, removes membranes and stops tearing. It is mostly used for external treatment, while internal use is rare.
Someone asked: Can Musk resolve injuries caused by consuming fruits? Is this true? The answer is: How can Musk resolve fruits? It can only kill insects in fruit trees. When one consumes too many fruits, there will inevitably be worms generated in the chest. Once worms are present, one will crave fruits; craving fruits leads to overeating them. Initially, eating them feels pleasant, but long-term consumption leads to chest stuffiness. In the past, people used Musk, and illnesses caused by eating fruits were cured, leading to the suspicion that Musk could digest fruits. Little did they know, this was actually the effect of killing insects. ([Commentary] Resolving the confusion of predecessors.)
Someone asked: Recently, physicians treating wind syndromes often use Musk to penetrate internally and externally, yet you do not discuss this. Is it incorrect to treat wind syndromes? The answer is: Wind diseases differ. Some invade the bones, some the skin and flesh, and some the zang-fu organs. One cannot indiscriminately use Musk, a drug with a penetrating and roaming nature. Generally, if wind invades the bone marrow, Musk is used as a last resort, allowing anti-pathogenic herbs to enter the bone marrow directly, expelling wind outward. This is the treatment for true stroke (*zhongfeng*, 中风). For other wind pathogens merely located outside the zang-fu organs and within the muscles, using Musk to guide wind into the bones would instead cause severe, incurable diseases. Moreover, since laypeople ignore contraindications and recklessly use Musk to treat pediatric acute and chronic convulsions, outcomes are often nine deaths for every one survival. Can one not be cautious?
Some doubt: If Musk cannot treat wind diseases, were the predecessors wrong to use it? The answer is: Predecessors used Musk to treat wind syndromes merely to borrow its aromatic, penetrating qi to guide herbs into the meridians and open closed orifices. Recent practitioners, unaware of the original intent behind the predecessors' formulas, use it indiscriminately regardless of whether orifices are closed or open. This results in guiding wind into the bones, preventing its expulsion, and creating wind syndromes where none existed, which is abhorrent.