凡治伤寒、瘟疫,医者最重初次得疾,至于抄复,谓死者盖寡,每视为最轻而
谩不经意焉。盖谓抄复之病,人身之经络、脏腑皆前次瘟邪所曾经传遍之所,则此番不过由熟路
而行,故邪气易出也。古人原有此论,岂知此第语其常也。独瘟疫盛行之时则不然,盖是时疫气
所积者浓,即无气食劳损之因,尚有重感疠气而复者,更有前番余邪稍有未净,再酝酿滋蔓而抖然
自复者,是天地之邪与人之气血胶固充塞,郁勃纠纷,故复至三四次尚有陨命者矣。慎毋以其复
也而忽之。
伤寒者,为寒所伤,其来也有因,故初感总以汗散为主。若瘟疫并作因寒而得,不可以治伤寒
之法治之。非惟麻、桂不用,即羌活、十神等汤亦非对症之药。所谓读伤寒书不足以治瘟疫者此
也。至于瘟疫变现杂症之多,几与伤寒等。吴又可《瘟疫论》中,仅有斑、黄汗、狂等数条,至于
《伤寒》中之诸汗、诸痛、诸血症,以及谵狂、渴烦、惕 、螈 、不语、摇头、大小便等症之方
论,瘟疫中可以裁取而用之者,正复不少也。然必斟酌尽善而后,可是总在人之学力见解,而非口
说之所能尽矣。所谓不读伤寒书,不足以治瘟疫者如此。
伤寒书率皆将阴阳二症参错并举,倏言阳症而用硝、黄,又倏言阴症而用桂、附,推作者之
意,虽相提并论,而其中分析,原自了然,若曰阳症若此,而阴症则如彼也。读者不善体会,随
将阴阳二症搅作一团,故有谓一人之病,有忽阴而忽阳者,有谓病在阳经为阳症,传入阴经为阴
症者,有谓阴阳错杂而难分者,种种支离,不可枚举。即不出乎此,亦视阴症为世所长有,与阳
症参半,故临症每将阴阳二字交战于心,而迄无定见。无怪乎用药差错,而误人性命也。欲除此
弊,莫若分读,先习传经之阳症,将直中阴经之阴症,暂行缓看。盖阳症明,而习阴症自易易耳。
何者?阳症头绪繁多,变现百出,至于阴症,并无传变,治法无多,易学易疗,当黜之杂症门中,
与暑、湿、霍乱、诸中等疾为一类,则自无阴阳误治之弊。
Whenever treating *Shanghan* (Cold Damage) and *Wenyi* (Plague Epidemic), physicians place the greatest emphasis on the initial onset of the disease. Regarding "Chaofu" (recurrence of the epidemic after apparent recovery), it is often considered that few die, leading practitioners to view it as a minor condition and treat it with negligence. The reasoning is that in cases of recurrence, the meridians and zang-fu organs have already been traversed by the pathogenic factors during the previous infection; thus, this time the pathogen merely travels a familiar route, making it easier to expel. Ancient texts indeed contain such arguments, but these only describe the general rule. However, during periods of rampant epidemic, this is not the case. At such times, the epidemic qi accumulates densely. Even without causes related to diet or overexertion, there are recurrences due to secondary contraction of pestilential qi. Furthermore, residual pathogens from the previous episode may linger, undergo further fermentation and spread, and suddenly recur. This occurs because the external pathogenic factors adhere firmly to the patient's qi and blood, causing blockage, stagnation, and chaotic entanglement. Consequently, patients may suffer fatal outcomes even after three or four recurrences. One must never disregard the condition simply because it is a recurrence.
*Shanghan* is caused by cold injury, which has a specific etiology; therefore, the primary treatment for the initial contraction is always diaphoresis (sweating to release the exterior). If *Wenyi* occurs concurrently and is triggered by cold, it cannot be treated using methods for *Shanghan*. Not only should *Mahuang Tang* (Ephedra Decoction) and *Guizhi Tang* (Cinnamon Twig Decoction) be avoided, but also *Qianghuo Tang* (Notopterygium Decoction) and *Shishen Tang* (Ten Deities Decoction) are not appropriate remedies. This illustrates why "reading only *Shanghan* books is insufficient to treat *Wenyi*." Moreover, the variety of complex symptoms presented by *Wenyi* is nearly equal to that of *Shanghan*. In Wu Keyi’s *Wenyi Lun* (Treatise on Pestilential Diseases), there are only a few entries regarding macules, yellow sweat, and mania. However, the formulas and discussions in *Shanghan Lun* (Treatise on Cold Damage Disorders) concerning various sweating patterns, pains, bleeding disorders, delirium, mania, thirst, irritability, palpitations, convulsions, mutism, head shaking, and abnormalities of urination and defecation can be extensively adapted and utilized in the treatment of *Wenyi*. Nevertheless, careful deliberation is required to ensure perfection; this depends entirely on the physician's scholarly attainment and insight, which cannot be fully conveyed through mere words. This explains why "not reading *Shanghan* books makes one insufficient to treat *Wenyi*."
Books on *Shanghan* generally intermingle yin and yang syndromes. They abruptly mention yang syndromes treated with *Xiaoshi* (Mirabilite) and *Dahuang* (Rhubarb), then abruptly mention yin syndromes treated with *Guizhi* (Cinnamon Twig) and *Fuzi* (Aconite Root). Examining the author's intent, although they are discussed together, the internal analysis remains clear: if a yang syndrome presents thus, a yin syndrome presents otherwise. Readers who fail to grasp this nuance tend to confuse yin and yang syndromes into a single entity. Thus, some claim that a single patient's illness fluctuates between yin and yang; others assert that disease in yang meridians constitutes a yang syndrome, while transmission to yin meridians constitutes a yin syndrome; still others argue that yin and yang are mixed and indistinguishable. These fragmented views are numerous and varied. Even excluding these, many consider yin syndromes common in clinical practice, accounting for half of all cases. Consequently, when diagnosing, physicians often struggle internally with distinguishing yin from yang, lacking definitive judgment. No wonder medication errors occur, leading to fatal mistakes. To eliminate this flaw, it is best to study them separately: first master the transmitted yang syndromes, and temporarily postpone studying the direct-entry yin syndromes. Once yang syndromes are understood, learning yin syndromes becomes easy. Why? Yang syndromes are complex with diverse manifestations, whereas yin syndromes involve no transmission, have fewer treatment methods, and are easier to learn and treat. They should be categorized under "Complex Syndromes," grouped with summerheat, dampness, cholera, and other similar diseases, thereby avoiding the error of misdiagnosing yin and yang.