署卫生家言者。或曰方脉。或曰症治。犹四时错举。春秋其实各有义也。脉主内症。主外有一脉。而诸症同
者。此症得此脉则生。彼症得此脉不必生。有一症而诸脉异者。某症得。某脉则善。某症得。某脉未必善。有
脉症浅深不相应凶吉。或相反则主脉不主症者。什七主症不主脉者。什三此脉症之不可混也。治通一
症而言。方指专剂而言。有合数方治一症。名相反实相成者。有分一方治数十百症特殊。先后别轻重者
。有与闻施。治之规模而主方未善。厥效不克。臻有恪守百验之古方。而施治失宜。不惟无益。甚且有害者
此方治之主可混也。故余往往语。病家尤详于症。告学道人尤详于治。幸不河汉余言矣。澄水吴子冲孺
。暨从弟任弘深得医家三昧迹。其言论多与余同。而复时发余之所未逮。癸巳夏。冲孺尊人涵虚。公患癃
闭。余以是过从。欲见留信宿不可得。因索其曾大父春严公一编袖归读之。是所谓详于脉。不略于症。详
于方。不略于治者也。然其为幅仅二百余。未满十万言。于以 轩岐绎长沙河间主婺朱氏而 及诸家
庶几备矣。余以是勉。冲孺氏梓行之。以嘉惠来学故虽不能序其所以然。而亦不敢默也。则亦言其论
方。先论治者。以告于世而已。挑灯竟读越宿而序。既成终不待信而已。振手告别也。
癸巳六月后学程道衍敬通氏灯下拜题
Those who write about medical theories may refer to them as "Fangmai" (Pulse and Formula) or "Zhengzhi" (Symptom and Treatment). This is akin to the enumeration of the four seasons; Spring and Autumn each have their own distinct principles. Pulse primarily reflects internal conditions. In treating external diseases, there is a specific pulse pattern; when various symptoms are identical, if this symptom presents with this pulse, the prognosis is favorable (Sheng), whereas if that symptom presents with this pulse, the prognosis is not necessarily favorable. There are cases where one symptom corresponds to multiple different pulses: if a certain symptom presents with a certain pulse, the outcome is good (Shan); if a certain symptom presents with a certain other pulse, the outcome may not be good. When the depth and superficiality of pulse and symptoms do not correspond, or when their indications for auspiciousness or inauspiciousness are contradictory, relying on the pulse rather than the symptom takes precedence in seventy percent (7/10) of cases, while relying on the symptom rather than the pulse accounts for thirty percent (3/10). This illustrates why pulse and symptoms must not be confused.
"Zhi" (Treatment) refers to general management applicable to a category of symptoms, whereas "Fang" (Formula) refers to a specific prescription. Some cases involve combining several formulas to treat one symptom, where the names appear opposite but the effects complement each other. Some involve using a single formula to treat dozens or hundreds of symptoms, distinguishing severity and sequence based on specific circumstances. Some practitioners may understand the general framework of treatment but choose an inappropriate primary formula, failing to achieve the desired efficacy. Others may rigidly adhere to ancient formulas known for hundred-percent efficacy but apply them inappropriately, resulting not only in no benefit but potentially causing harm. This illustrates why formulas and treatments must not be confused.
Therefore, I often advise patients to pay particular attention to their symptoms, and I advise students of medicine to pay particular attention to treatment methods. I hope my words will not be dismissed as empty talk (Hehan). Wu Chongru from Chengshui, along with his cousin Ren Hong, has deeply grasped the essence of medical practice. Their views largely align with mine, yet they frequently express insights that I had overlooked.
In the summer of the Guisi year, Mr. Hanxu, father of Chongru, suffered from Longbi (Dysuria/Retention of urine). I visited him with the intention of staying for two nights, but it was not possible. Consequently, I requested a volume by his great-grandfather, Chunyan Gong, which I took home to read. This book is what is meant by "detailed in pulse, not neglecting symptoms; detailed in formula, not neglecting treatment." However, its length is only over two hundred pages, falling short of one hundred thousand characters. Through it, one can deduce the theories of Huangdi (Yellow Emperor), Qibo, Zhang Zhongjing (Changsha), Liu Wansu (Hejian), and the Zhu family of Wuzhou, covering various schools of thought, making it nearly comprehensive. Encouraged by this, I urged Chongru to print and distribute it to benefit future scholars. Thus, although I cannot explain all the underlying reasons in detail, I dare not remain silent. I merely present his discussions on formulas, preceded by his discussions on treatment, to inform the world. Having finished reading by lamplight, I composed this preface the following night. Now that it is complete, I bid farewell without waiting for further correspondence.
Written respectfully under the lamp by the junior scholar Cheng Daoyan in the sixth month of the Guisi year.