阳旺未有不胜阴者,其阳旺而阴生,必剂中有阴药之为引导。若人参本具生津益气之大
力,
与肉桂、附子纯阳者迥别,其益阴,本不得谓之阳旺之功也。至于真火衰歇,沉阴冱寒,津
气因寒不得敷布,发为烦渴;精血因寒不得充壮,发为枯瘦;渣滓因寒不得运动,发为秘结
,以姜、桂、萸、附补益真阳,遂能蒸动津液,宣化水精,使五脏百脉为之充润也。此阳旺
而阴始化,非阳旺而阴自生也。又有暴病,阴盛格阳,寒结于内,热浮于上,烦躁,狂妄,
谵语,喘促,以桂、附开其下寒,而虚火遂返其宅者,此亦阴化,非阴生也。且皆以其阴盛
,而益阳以胜之,使归于和平,非以阴少,而益阳以助之也。岂真有精枯血燥,虚火亢炎,
而桂,附能以独力致阴消火者乎?必用阴药而资桂、附熏蒸鼓舞之力也。《内经》谓∶辛能
开腠理,通气致津液,其所谓“致”,是自此而之彼,非自无而之有;是熏蒸、鼓舞、宣通
、敷布之谓,非包涵、孕育、滋长、增益之谓也。前人措词过当,每多如此,其病根总由于
语欲惊人也。后人习为常谈,漫不加察,贻误匪浅,故敢正之。
吴又可谓∶黄连性寒不泄,只能制热,不能泄实;若内有实邪,必资大黄以泄之,否则
畏大
黄之峻,而徒以黄连清之,反将热邪遏住,内伏益深,攻治益难。此义甚精。凡治病,总宜
使邪有出路。宜下出者,不泄之不得下也;宜外出者,不散之不得外也。近时于温热证,喜
寒清而畏寒泄;于寒湿证,喜温补而畏温通。曾闻有患痰饮者,久服附子,化为 肿,是不
用茯苓、猪苓之苦降淡渗以导邪,而专益其阳,阳气充旺,遂鼓激痰水四溢矣,即补而不泄
之过也。张子和变化于汗、吐、下之三法,以治百病。盖治病非三法不可也,病去调理,乃
可专补,补非所以治病也。且出路又不可差也。近时治病,好用利水,不拘何病,皆兼利小
便,此误会前人治病以小便通利为快捷方式之说也。尝有患痰饮而 肿者,医以真武、五苓合与
之,不效。余曰∶此因三焦阳气不得宣通于表,表气郁而里气始急也。虽有痰饮,并不胀满
,
宜以温补合辛散,不得合淡渗也。治之果汗出而愈,渗之是益伤其里矣。当时有谓∶须泄虚
其里,使表水退返于里以泄之,而后可愈者,是真杀之也。前人有用此法者,是邪伏里膜,
非在肤表也。虚其肠胃,俟里膜之邪复聚于肠胃,然后从而竭之。如吴又可所谓;俟膜原热
邪复淤到胃,再用下法是也。盖肿,表证也,为风,为寒湿,其证动而后喘,法宜散之;胀
,里证也,为湿热里盛,脾实肝滞,木郁土中,其证不待动而自喘,法宜泄之;肿胀兼有,
散之、泄之。未有肤肿而反泄之,使陷入于里者也。
Yang qi being vigorous has never failed to overcome yin. However, if one wishes for yin to generate under the condition of vigorous yang, the prescription must contain yin-nourishing herbs as guides. Ren Shen (Ginseng Radix) inherently possesses great power to generate body fluids and benefit primordial qi, which is distinctly different from Rou Gui (Cinnamon Twig) and Fu Zi (Aconite Lateralis Radix Praeparata), which are purely yang in nature. Its ability to benefit yin cannot be attributed to the merit of vigorous yang. As for cases where the True Fire (Kidney Yang) is declining and sinking, with deep cold freezing the interior, body fluids and primordial qi fail to distribute due to cold, resulting in irritability and thirst; essence and blood fail to become abundant and strong due to cold, resulting in emaciation and dryness; waste materials fail to move due to cold, resulting in constipation. By using Jiang (Zingiberis Rhizoma), Rou Gui (Cinnamon Twig), Yu Zhu (Corni Fructus), and Fu Zi (Aconite Lateralis Radix Praeparata) to tonify the True Yang, one can vaporize and activate body fluids, disseminate and transform water essences, thereby moistening and nourishing the five zang organs and all vessels. This is yang becoming vigorous so that yin begins to transform, not yang becoming vigorous so that yin generates itself. There are also acute diseases where excessive yin repels yang, with cold knotting internally and heat floating externally, presenting with irritability, madness, delirious speech, and panting. By using Rou Gui (Cinnamon Twig) and Fu Zi (Aconite Lateralis Radix Praeparata) to open the lower cold, the deficient fire returns to its residence. This is also the transformation of yin, not the generation of yin. Moreover, these situations involve benefiting yang to overcome excessive yin, restoring balance, rather than benefiting yang to assist because yin is insufficient. Can it truly be that in cases of exhausted essence and dry blood with hyperactive deficient fire, Rou Gui (Cinnamon Twig) and Fu Zi (Aconite Lateralis Radix Praeparata) alone can eliminate yin and extinguish fire? Yin-nourishing herbs must be used to support the vaporizing and stimulating power of Rou Gui (Cinnamon Twig) and Fu Zi (Aconite Lateralis Radix Praeparata). The *Neijing* states: "Pungent flavors can open the cou li (skin pores and interstices), unblock qi mechanism, and deliver body fluids." The term "deliver" here means moving from here to there, not creating something from nothing; it refers to vaporizing, stimulating, disseminating, and distributing, not encompassing, conceiving, nourishing, or increasing. Predecessors often used exaggerated wording, rooted in a desire to shock people. Successors have taken this as common talk without scrutiny, causing significant harm, so I dare to correct this.
Wu Youke stated: Huang Lian (Coptidis Rhizoma) is cold but does not purge; it can only restrain heat but cannot drain excess. If there is excess pathogen inside, Da Huang (Rhei Radix et Rhizoma) must be relied upon to purge it; otherwise, fearing the harshness of Da Huang (Rhei Radix et Rhizoma) and merely using Huang Lian (Coptidis Rhizoma) to clear heat will instead suppress the heat pathogen, causing it to hide deeper within, making treatment more difficult. This insight is profound. In treating any disease, one should always provide an exit for the pathogen. What should exit via defecation cannot be discharged without purging; what should exit via sweating cannot be released without dispersing. Recently, in treating warm-heat syndromes, physicians prefer cold clearing but fear cold purging; in treating cold-damp syndromes, they prefer warm tonification but fear warm unblocking. I once heard of a patient with Tan Yin (Phlegm-Rheum) who took Fu Zi (Aconite Lateralis Radix Praeparata) for a long time and developed edema. This was because Ku Jiang Dan Shen (Pinelliae Rhizoma Preparatum) and Zhu Ling (Polyporus) were not used for their bitter descending and bland leaching properties to guide the pathogen out, but rather yang was solely tonified. The resulting vigorous yang qi stirred up phlegm-fluids, causing them to overflow. This is the fault of tonifying without draining. Zhang Hezi varied the three methods of sweating, vomiting, and purging to treat hundred diseases. Treating diseases essentially requires these three methods; only after the pathogen is removed can one focus on tonification for recovery. Tonification is not the method for eliminating disease. Furthermore, the exit route must not be mistaken. Recently, physicians love using diuretics indiscriminately for any disease, misunderstanding the predecessors' saying that free urination is a shortcut to curing disease. I once treated a patient with Tan Yin (Phlegm-Rheum) and edema. A physician prescribed Zhen Wu Tang (True Warrior Decoction) combined with Wu Ling San (Five-Ingredient Powder with Poria), but it was ineffective. I said: This is because the yang qi of the San Jiao (Triple Burner) cannot be disseminated to the exterior, leading to exterior qi stagnation and subsequent interior urgency. Although there is phlegm-rheum, there is no distension. One should use warm tonification combined with pungent dispersion, not bland leaching. The treatment indeed resulted in sweating and cure. Using leaching would further damage the interior. At that time, someone suggested: "One must purge to empty the interior, allowing exterior water to retreat into the interior for purging, before recovery is possible." This is truly killing the patient. Predecessors used this method when the pathogen was latent in the Mo Yuan (Membrane Source), not on the skin surface. By emptying the stomach and intestines, one waits for the pathogen in the membrane source to gather again in the stomach and intestines, then exhausts it. This is like Wu Youke's statement: Wait until the heat pathogen in the membrane source accumulates in the stomach, then use purging. Edema is an exterior syndrome caused by wind, cold, or dampness; symptoms include panting after movement, and the method should be dispersing. Distension is an interior syndrome caused by excess damp-heat, spleen excess, liver stagnation, and wood depressing earth; symptoms include panting without movement, and the method should be purging. When both swelling and distension exist, disperse and purge together. It is unheard of to have skin edema and yet use purging, causing the pathogen to sink inward.