或问《铜人》、《千金》等书空穴多,《十四经发挥》所载空穴少,如风市、督俞、金
津玉液等,彼有此无,不同何也?曰∶《十四经发挥》据《素问》骨空篇论及王注,若《铜
人》、《千金》等皆偏书,非黄岐正经也。
或问∶睛明、迎香、承泣、丝竹空,皆禁灸何也?曰∶四穴近目,目畏火,故禁灸也。
以是推之,则知睛明不可灸,王注误矣。
或问∶用针浑是泻而无补,古人用之,所以导气,治之以有余之病也。今人鲜用之,或
知其无补而不用欤?抑元气禀赋之薄而不用欤?或斫丧之多而用针无益欤?抑不善用而不用
欤?经曰∶阳不足者温之以气,精不足者补之以味。针乃砭石所制,即无气,又无味,破皮
损肉,发窍于身,气皆从窍出矣,何得为补?经曰∶气血阴阳俱不足,勿取以针,和以甘药
,是也,又曰∶形气不足,病气不足,此阴阳皆不足也,不可刺之;刺之重竭其气,老者绝
灭,壮者不复矣。若此谓者,皆是有泻而无补也。
或问∶病有在气分者,有在血分者,不知针家,亦分气与血否?曰∶气分、血分之病,
针家亦所当知。病在气分,游行不定;病在血分,沉着不移。以积块言之,腹中或上或下,
或有或无者,是气分也;或在两胁,或在心下,或在脐上下左右,一定不移,以渐而长者,
是血分也。以病风言之,或左手移于右手,右足移于左足,移动不常者,气分也;或常在左
足,或偏在右手,着而不走者,血分也。凡病莫不皆然。须知在气分者,上有病,下取之,
下有病,上取之;在左取右,在右取左。在血分者,随其血之所在,应病取之。苟或血病泻
气,气病泻血,是谓诛伐无过,咎将谁归!
或问∶今医用针,动辄以袖复手,暗行指法,谓其法之神秘,弗轻示人,惟恐盗取其法
者,不知果何法耶?曰∶《金针赋》十四法,与夫青龙摆尾等法,可谓已尽之矣;舍此而求
他法之神秘,吾未之信也。今若此者,不过过为诡妄,以欺人耳。纵为至巧,殆必神亦不
,针亦不灵也。奚足尚哉!
或问∶有医置针于穴,略不加意,或谈笑,或饮酒,半饷之间,又将针拈几拈,令呼几
呼
,仍复登筵以饮,然后起针,果能愈病否乎?曰∶经云∶凡刺之真,必先治神。又云∶手动
若务,针耀而匀,静意视义,观适之变。又云∶如临深渊,手如握虎,神无营于众物。又云
∶如侍所贵,不知日暮。凡此数说,敬乎怠乎?若谈笑饮酒,不敬孰甚,安能愈病哉?业医者
,当深长思矣!
Questioner: The *Tongren* (Bronze Man) and *Qianjin* (Thousand Gold Formulas) texts record more empty acupoints, whereas the *Shisi Jing Fahui* (Elucidation of the Fourteen Meridians) records fewer. For instance, Fengshi (GB31), Dushu (BL16), Jinjin (EX-UE10), and Yuye (EX-UE11) are present in the former but absent in the latter. Why is there such a discrepancy?
Responder: The *Shisi Jing Fahui* is based on the "Gu Kong" (Empty Bones) chapter of the *Suwen* (Basic Questions) and Wang Bing’s commentary. In contrast, texts like the *Tongren* and *Qianjin* are considered partial works and not the orthodox classics of Huangdi (Yellow Emperor) and Qibo (Qibo).
Questioner: Jingming (BL1), Yingxiang (LI20), Chengqi (ST1), and Sizhukong (SJ23) are all contraindicated for moxibustion. Why is this so?
Responder: These four points are located near the eyes. Since the eyes fear fire, moxibustion is prohibited at these locations. By inference from this, it is known that Jingming (BL1) should not be moxaed; Wang Bing’s commentary was erroneous.
Questioner: Needle manipulation seems to consist entirely of reducing methods without any tonifying methods. The ancients used needles to guide Qi and treat diseases of excess. Nowadays, people rarely use them. Is it because they know needles lack tonifying effects and thus avoid them? Or is it due to weak constitutional Qi? Or perhaps because excessive depletion renders needle therapy ineffective? Or is it simply due to improper usage? The Classics state: "For deficiency of Yang Qi, warm with Qi; for deficiency of Essence, tonify with Flavor." Needles are made from Bian stones; they possess neither Qi nor Flavor. They pierce the skin, damage the flesh, and open apertures on the body, causing Qi to escape through these apertures. How can they provide tonification? The Classics further state: "When Qi, Blood, Yin, and Yang are all deficient, do not use needles; instead, harmonize with sweet herbs." This is correct. It also states: "When both Form-Qi and Pathogenic-Qi are deficient, this indicates a deficiency of both Yin and Yang; do not puncture. Puncturing will severely deplete their Qi; the elderly will perish, and the robust will fail to recover." Such statements imply that needle therapy offers only reduction and no tonification.
Questioner: Diseases may reside in the Qi level or the Blood level. Do acupuncture practitioners distinguish between Qi and Blood?
Responder: Acupuncture practitioners must understand diseases of the Qi and Blood levels. Disease in the Qi level is migratory and unstable; disease in the Blood level is fixed and immovable. Regarding accumulations and masses: if the mass moves up or down in the abdomen, appearing or disappearing, it belongs to the Qi level. If it is located in the hypochondrium, below the heart, or above/below/left/right of the umbilicus, remaining fixed and gradually enlarging, it belongs to the Blood level. Regarding wind diseases: if symptoms move from the left hand to the right hand, or from the right foot to the left foot, changing frequently, it is a Qi-level disease. If symptoms remain fixed in the left foot or right hand, adhering without moving, it is a Blood-level disease. This applies to all diseases. One must know that for Qi-level diseases, treat upper disorders by selecting lower points, lower disorders by selecting upper points, left-sided disorders by selecting right points, and right-sided disorders by selecting left points. For Blood-level diseases, select points corresponding to the location of the blood pathology. If one reduces Qi when treating Blood disorders, or reduces Blood when treating Qi disorders, this is called punishing the innocent; who shall bear the blame!
Questioner: Modern physicians often cover their hands with sleeves while needling, secretly performing techniques, claiming these methods are mysterious and not shown to others, fearing theft of their skills. What exactly are these methods?
Responder: The fourteen techniques in the *Jinzhen Fu* (Ode to the Golden Needle), along with methods like Qinglong Baiwei (Green Dragon Wags Tail), are comprehensive. To seek mystery beyond these, I cannot believe it. Those who act thus are merely being deceitful and fraudulent to deceive people. Even if highly skilled, surely the Spirit will not bless them, and the needles will not be effective. What is there to admire!
Questioner: Some physicians insert needles into acupoints with little attention, chatting or drinking wine. After half a meal's time, they twirl the needle a few times, ask the patient to call out a few times, return to the banquet to drink, and then remove the needle. Can this truly cure disease?
Responder: The Classics state: "The essence of needling requires first governing the Shen (Spirit)." It also states: "Hand movements must be focused; the needle must be bright and even. Calmly observe the meaning, watching for changes in appropriateness." It further states: "As if facing an abyss, hand like holding a tiger, let the Shen not be distracted by myriad objects." And again: "As if serving a noble person, unaware of the sunset." Do these sayings suggest reverence or negligence? Chatting and drinking wine—what could be more irreverent? How can disease be cured? Practitioners of medicine should reflect deeply on this!