钱氏疗疮疹证候惟用温凉之剂治之又戒云不可妄下及妄攻发盖毒发于表如苟妄汗则荣卫
一虚
重令开泄转增疮烂由是风邪乘间变证者有之毒根于里如苟妄下则内气一虚毒不能出而返入焉
由是土不胜水变黑归肾身体振寒耳 反热眼合肚胀其疮黑陷十无一生汗下二说古人所深戒以
此观之疮疹证状虽与伤寒相似而其治法实与伤寒不同伤寒从表而入里疮疹从里而出表故也其
或气实烦躁热炽大便秘结不通者宜略与疏之若小便赤少者分利之则热气有所渗而出凡热又不
可骤遏但轻解之若无热则疮又不能发越也
丹溪曰读前人之书当知其立言之意苟读其书而不知其意求通于用不可得也痘疮之论钱氏
为详历
举源流经络分明表里虚实开陈其施治之法而又证以论辨之言深得着书垂教之体学人读而用之
如求方圆于规矩较平直于准绳引而伸之触类而长之可为无穷之应用也今人不知致病之因不求
立方之意仓卒之际据证检方漫尔一试设有不应并其书而废之不思之甚也近因局方之教久行素
问
之学不讲抱疾谈医者类皆喜温而恶寒喜补而恶解利忽得陈氏方论皆燥热补剂其辞确其文简忻
然用之翕然信之遂以为钱氏不及陈氏远矣或曰子以陈氏方为不足欤曰陈氏方诚一偏论虽然亦
可谓善求病情者其意大率归重于太阴一经盖以手太阴属肺主皮毛也足太阴属脾主肌肉肺金恶
寒而易于感脾土恶湿而无物不受观其用丁香官桂所以治肺之寒也用附子半夏所以治脾之湿也
使其肺果有寒脾果有湿而兼有虚也量而与之中病则止何伤之有今也不然徒见其疮之出迟
者身热者泄泻者惊悸者气急者渴思饮者不问寒热虚实率投木香散异
功散间有偶中随手获效设或误投祸不旋踵何者古人用药制方有向导有监制有反佐有因用若钱
氏方固未尝废细辛丁香白术参 等率有监制辅佐之药不专务于温补耳然其用凉药者多而于辅
助
一法略开端绪痴人之前不可说梦钱氏之虑至矣亦将有一候达者扩充推展而用虽然渴者用温药
痒蹋者用补药自陈氏发之迥出前辈然其多用桂附丁香等燥热恐未为适中也何者桂附丁香辈当
有寒而虚固是的当虚而未必寒者其为害当何如耶陈氏立方之时必有挟寒而痘疮者其用燥热补
之固其宜也今未挟寒而用一偏之方宁不过于热乎予尝会诸家之粹求其意而用之实未敢据其成
方也试举一二以证之从子六七岁时患痘疮发热微渴自利一小方脉视之用木香散每贴又增丁香
十粒予切疑焉观其出迟固因自利而气弱察其所下皆臭滞陈积因肠胃热蒸而下也恐非有寒而虚
遂急止之已投一帖矣继以黄连解毒汤加白术与十帖以解丁香之热利止疮亦出其后肌常有微热
而手足生痈疖与凉剂调
补逾月而安又一男子年十六七岁发热而昏目无视耳无闻两手脉皆豁大而略数知其为劳伤矣时
里中多发痘者虽不知人与药则饮与粥则食遂教参 当归白术陈皮大料浓煎与之饮至三十余帖
痘始出又二十余帖则成脓泡身无全肤或曰病势可畏何不用陈氏全方治之余曰此但虚耳无寒也
只守前方又数十余帖而安后询其病因谓先四五日恐有出痘之病遂极力樵采连日出汗甚多
若用陈氏全方宁无后悔至正甲申春阳气早动正月间邑间痘疮不越一家率投陈氏方童幼死者百
余人虽由天数吾恐人事亦或未之尽也
按钱氏论痘疮形色轻重困剧而用药已具其端绪矣至洁古又辩所兼之证及候音声察形气为
病而
处治之法可谓详悉但世俗不深味其意反有疑似丹溪先生所以言之喋喋也大抵世俗喜温而恶寒
将钱氏之法推充多疑似如云不可妄下盖妄之一字戒慎之意当有可下之理也若疮疹初发有因里
实而出不快渴而脉数便秘烦躁不下可乎有将靥之际里实而渴便秘身热不可下乎或云首尾俱不
可下或指上吐下泻也但自
病体虚实不等时令中法治之异要当适中病情尔故钱氏云看时月此句关系甚妙如冬月盛寒便难
例用凉剂且小儿痘疮本五脏之毒所发非止属诸痛痒疮皆出心火之比故陈氏方一出亦多获效今
人用钱氏方亦有致误者盖不善用兵之过非制法者之过也宜求平立方本旨矧岁气时临灾青浅深
不同小儿体有虚实之异用药不可轻举详洁古以下数法中佐以风药是兼升发之意亦慎之也何热
剂与香窜之药宣可例用乎然有毒入关窍肌骨肉邪气下陷用此而获生者或有之恐千百而一二也
又按明医杂着云丹溪痘疮治法最为明备近法陈文中木香散异功散等方乃一偏之术若痘疮虚弱
淡白色痒塌属虚寒者宜用之若发热壮盛齐涌红紫色燥痒此属热毒急宜凉血自陈文中方盛行后
属虚寒者率得生属热毒者悉不救痘是胎毒古人治法只解毒然气血虚则又送毒瓦斯不出及不能成
就故陈文中之法既行而解毒之旨遂隐故救得一边又害了一边今必详究丹溪之法通用斯无弊也
钱乙治疗疮疹的证候,只使用温凉性质的方剂进行治疗,并且告诫说不可随意使用泻下法或妄用攻发之法。这是因为毒邪发于体表,如果随意发汗,会导致营卫之气虚弱,反而使腠理更加开泄,加重疮疡溃烂;因此会有风邪乘虚而入,产生变证的情况。如果毒根深伏于体内,随意使用泻下法,会导致内气虚弱,毒邪不能排出反而内陷。由此导致土(脾)不胜水(肾),出现痘疮变黑归肾的症状,表现为身体战栗恶寒、耳朵反热、眼睛闭合、腹部胀满,痘疮黑陷,这种情况十无一活。关于发汗和泻下这两种说法,是古人所深深忌讳的。由此看来,疮疹的证状虽然与伤寒相似,但其治疗方法实际上与伤寒不同。这是因为伤寒的病邪是从表入里,而疮疹的毒邪是从里出表。
如果患者正气充足,出现烦躁、热势炽盛、大便秘结不通的情况,适宜稍微给予疏利通便的药物。如果小便赤少,则采用分利小便的方法,使热气有所渗透而出。凡是热邪都不可以骤然遏制,只能轻微地解其热;如果没有热邪,那么疮疹又不能透发出来。
朱丹溪说:阅读前人的医书,应当了解他们立论的本意。如果读书却不知道其中的深意,想要通晓并应用于临床,是不可能做到的。关于痘疮的论述,钱乙最为详尽,历举源流,经络分明,表里虚实清晰,陈述了施治的方法,又通过辨证的语言加以论证,深得著书垂教的精神。学习的人读了之后加以运用,就像用圆规和矩尺来求方圆,用准绳来衡量平直一样,引申开来,触类旁通,可以无穷无尽地应用。现在的人不知道致病的病因,不探究立方的用意,在仓促之际,根据症状翻找方子,漫不经心地尝试一次。如果有不对症的,就废弃那本书,这是不思量之极啊。
近来因为《局方》(太平惠民和剂局方)的教法长久流行,《素问》(黄帝内经素问)的学问不被讲究,患有疾病谈论医术的人,大多喜欢温热而厌恶寒凉,喜欢补益而厌恶解利。忽然得到陈氏(陈文中)的方论,都是燥热补剂的方子,言辞确切,文字简练,人们欣然使用,一致相信,于是认为钱乙不如陈氏远矣。有人问:你认为陈氏的方剂不足取吗?我说:陈氏的方剂确实有偏颇之处,但也可以说是善于探求病情的人。他的意图大体上归结重于太阴经。手太阴肺经属肺,主皮毛;足太阴脾经属脾,主肌肉。肺金厌恶寒冷而易于感受外邪,脾土厌恶湿气而无物不受。看他用丁香、官桂来治疗肺的寒冷,用附子、半夏来治疗脾的湿气。如果患者的肺确实有寒,脾确实有湿,并且兼有虚损,那么酌情给予药物,中病即止,有什么伤害呢?现在却不是这样,仅仅看到痘疮发出迟缓、身体发热、泄泻、惊悸、气急、口渴想喝水等症状,不问寒热虚实,一律投用木香散、异功散等方。偶尔有碰巧奏效、随手获效的情况。如果误用了,灾祸立刻就会降临。为什么呢?古人用药制方,有向导药、监制药、反佐药、因用(随证加减)的原则。像钱乙的方子,固然没有废除细辛、丁香、白术、人参等药,但其中都有监制、辅佐的药物,并不专门致力于温补。然而他使用凉药的较多,对于辅助这一方面只是略微开端。对不懂的人说这些如同说梦话。钱乙的考虑已经很周到了,也希望将来有通达之士能够扩充推广并加以运用。虽然如此,口渴者用温药,痒塌者用补药,自从陈氏提出后,确实超出了前辈,但他多用桂枝、附子、丁香等燥热之品,恐怕未必适合所有情况。为什么呢?桂枝、附子、丁香这类药物,当用于确有寒邪且虚弱的情况时,确实是恰当的。但如果只是虚而未必有寒,其危害该有多大呢?陈氏创立方剂的时候,必定有挟带寒邪而患痘疮的人,他用燥热药补之,固然是适宜的。但现在没有挟带寒邪却使用这种偏颇的方子,难道不会过于热了吗?我曾经汇集各家的精华,探求其本意而加以运用,实在不敢拘泥于成方。试举一两个例子来证明。我的侄子六七岁时患痘疮,发热、微渴、自利(自行腹泻)。我诊视脉象,使用木香散,每帖又增加丁香十粒。我心里很怀疑。观察他痘疮发出迟缓,固然因为自行腹泻导致气弱,但我察看他所下的粪便皆臭秽滞涩,是陈积之物,这是由于肠胃热蒸迫而下注所致,恐怕不是有寒而虚。于是急忙停止服用已投的一帖药。继而又用黄连解毒汤加白术,连服十帖,以解除丁香的热性。腹泻停止,痘疮也发出了。后来肌肤常有微热,手足生痈疖,用凉剂调补,过了一个月才安定。
又有一男子,十六七岁,发热而昏沉,眼睛看不见,耳朵听不见,两手脉象都豁大而略数,我知道这是劳伤所致。当时乡里中多发痘疮的人,虽然不知道具体是谁,但如果是病人,就给他喝药,如果是食物,就让他吃。于是我教他用大量的人参、当归、白术、陈皮,浓煎给他饮用。喝了三十多帖,痘疮才开始发出。又喝了二十多帖,脓泡形成,身上没有完好的皮肤。有人说:病势可怕,为什么不用陈氏的全方治疗?我说:这只是虚证,没有寒邪。只坚守前方,又喝了数十帖才痊愈。后来询问病因,他说先四五日,恐怕有出痘的病,于是极力砍柴采薪,连续出汗很多。如果用陈氏的全方,岂不是要后悔吗?至正甲申年春天,阳气早动,正月间,县里的痘疮不超过一家,都投用陈氏的方子,童幼死者百余人。这虽然由天数决定,但我担心人事方面或许也没有做到极致吧。
按:钱乙论述痘疮的形色轻重困剧,以及用药,已经具备了端绪。李东垣(洁古)又辨析了所兼的证候及声音气息,察形气为病而处治的方法,可谓详细完备。但世俗之人不深刻体味其中的意思,反而产生疑似误解。丹溪先生所以喋喋不休地解释,就是因为这个原因。大抵世俗人喜欢温热而厌恶寒凉,将钱乙的方法推演扩充,多有疑似。比如“不可妄下”,这个“妄”字,是戒慎的意思,应当有可下的道理。如果疮疹初发,有因里实而出发不快,口渴、脉数、便秘、烦躁,不下行可以吗?有将要收靥之际,里实而渴、便秘、身热,不可下吗?或者说从头到尾都不可下,或者是指上吐下泻的情况。但只要根据病体的虚实不等,时令中法治之,只要适中病情即可。所以钱乙说“看时月”,这句话关系非常微妙。如冬月盛寒,便难以例用凉剂。况且小儿痘疮本是五脏之毒所发,不仅仅属于诸痛痒疮皆出心火之比。所以陈氏的方子一出,也多获效。现在人用钱乙的方子也有导致失误的,这是不善于用兵(用药)的过错,不是制定法则者的过错。应该探求平和立方之本旨。何况岁气时令,深浅不同,小儿体质有虚实之异,用药不可轻举妄动。参照洁古以下数法中佐以风药,是兼有升发之意,也要谨慎。什么热剂与香窜之药都可以例行使用吗?然而有毒邪陷入关窍、肌骨肉,邪气下陷,用此法而获生的,或许有,恐怕千百人中仅一二人也。
又按《明医杂着》记载:丹溪的痘疮治法最为明备。近世流行的陈文中木香散、异功散等方,乃是一偏之术。若痘疮虚弱、淡白色、痒塌,属虚寒者,宜用之。若发热壮盛、齐涌、红紫色、燥痒,此属热毒,急宜凉血。自从陈文中方盛行后,属虚寒的都得以生存,属热毒的都未能救治。痘是胎毒,古人治法只解毒,但若气血虚则又送毒瓦斯不出,及不能成就(化脓成熟)。所以陈文中之法既行,而解毒之旨遂隐。故救得一边,又害了一边。现在必须详细考究丹溪之法,通用斯无弊也。
Qian Yi treated the syndromes of sores and pox (chuang zhen) only with agents of warm and cool nature, and also warned against arbitrary purgation or reckless diaphoresis. This is because the toxin erupts at the exterior; if one recklessly induces sweating, Ying and Wei Qi (Nutritive and Defensive Qi) will become deficient, causing the pores to open further and exacerbating the ulceration of sores. Consequently, Wind pathogen may take advantage of this vacancy, leading to altered syndromes. If the root of the toxin lies within, and one recklessly uses purgatives, the internal Qi will become deficient, preventing the toxin from being expelled and causing it to retreat inward. This leads to Earth (Spleen) failing to control Water (Kidney), resulting in blackening of the pox returning to the Kidney, manifesting as body tremors and aversion to cold, ears becoming hot, eyes closed, abdominal distension, and black sunken pox; in such cases, ten out of ten do not survive. The prohibition of both sweating and purging are deeply cautioned against by ancient physicians. From this perspective, although the symptoms of sores and pox resemble those of Cold Damage (Shanghan), their treatment methods are actually different. This is because pathogens in Cold Damage enter from the exterior into the interior, whereas toxins in sores and pox emerge from the interior to the exterior.
If the patient's Qi is substantial, presenting with irritability, intense heat, constipation, and inability to pass stool, it is appropriate to slightly administer laxative or draining agents. If urine is scanty and red, one should employ methods to separate clear from turbid (diuresis), allowing heat to渗 (seep) out. Generally, heat should not be abruptly suppressed but lightly resolved; without heat, the pox cannot erupt.
Zhu Danxi said: When reading the books of predecessors, one must understand their intent. If one reads the book but does not grasp its meaning, one cannot achieve practical application. Regarding the discussion on smallpox, Qian Yi was the most detailed, tracing sources and meridians clearly, distinguishing between exterior/interior and deficiency/excess, and expounding treatment methods supported by dialectical arguments, truly embodying the spirit of writing for instruction. Students who read and apply these methods can derive infinite applications, just as one uses compasses and squares to find circles and rectangles, or a plumb line to measure straightness. Nowadays, people do not understand the causes of disease nor the intent behind prescription formulation. In emergencies, they consult prescriptions based merely on symptoms and try them indiscriminately. If ineffective, they discard the book entirely, which is extremely thoughtless.
Recently, due to the long-standing popularity of the *Ju Fang* (Formulas of the Bureau of People's Welfare), and the neglect of studies on the *Su Wen* (Basic Questions), those discussing medicine while ill tend to prefer warmth over cold, and tonification over dispersal/drainage. Suddenly encountering Chen Shi's (Chen Wenzhong) formulas, which consist of drying, heating, and tonifying agents, people find the language precise and text concise, using them joyfully and believing in them universally, thus concluding that Qian Yi is far inferior to Chen Shi. Someone asked: Do you think Chen Shi's formulas are inadequate? I replied: Chen Shi's formulas indeed have a bias, yet they can be said to belong to those skilled at seeking the condition of illness. His intent largely focuses on the Taiyin Meridian. The Hand Taiyin Lung Meridian belongs to the Lung, governing skin and hair; the Foot Taiyin Spleen Meridian belongs to the Spleen, governing muscles. Metal of the Lung dislikes cold and is easily affected; Earth of the Spleen dislikes dampness and accepts everything. Observing his use of Ding Xiang (Clove) and Guan Gui (Cinnamon Twig) to treat Lung cold, and Fu Zi (Aconite) and Ban Xia (Pinellia) to treat Spleen dampness: if the Lung truly has cold, the Spleen truly has dampness, and there is concomitant deficiency, then administering medication proportionally and stopping when the disease is cured causes no harm. However, nowadays, people merely see delayed eruption, fever, diarrhea, palpitations, shortness of breath, and thirst, regardless of cold/heat or deficiency/excess, and indiscriminately administer Mu Xiang San (Costus Root Powder) or Yi Gong San (Five-Agent Powder). Occasionally, there are coincidental successes. But if misapplied, disaster follows immediately. Why? Ancient physicians used guiding, restraining, counteracting, and conditional herbs in their formulations. Although Qian Yi did not discard herbs like Xi Xin (Asarum), Ding Xiang, Bai Zhu (Atractylodes), and Ren Shen (Ginseng), he included restraining and assisting herbs, not solely focusing on warming and tonifying. However, he used cooling herbs more frequently, leaving the method of assistance only partially developed. It is like talking dreams to an idiot. Qian Yi's considerations were thorough, hoping future experts would expand upon them. Nevertheless, using warming herbs for thirst and tonics for collapsing sores, since Chen Shi's advocacy, has surpassed predecessors, but his frequent use of Gui Zhi (Cinnamon Twig), Fu Zi, and Ding Xiang—drying and heating herbs—is perhaps not universally suitable. For instance, Gui Zhi, Fu Zi, and Ding Xiang are appropriate when there is true cold and deficiency. But what if there is deficiency without cold? The harm could be significant. When Chen Shi formulated, there were likely cases of smallpox complicated by cold, making drying and heating tonification appropriate. But now, using such biased formulas without cold complications risks excessive heat. I have synthesized the essence of various schools and applied their principles, daring not rely blindly on established formulas. Let me cite two examples. My nephew, aged six or seven, suffered from smallpox with fever, slight thirst, and spontaneous diarrhea. Upon pulse diagnosis, I prescribed Mu Xiang San, adding ten grains of Ding Xiang per dose. I harbored doubts. Observing his delayed eruption, partly due to Qi deficiency from diarrhea, I examined his stool, finding it foul and stagnant, indicating accumulation driven by intestinal heat steaming downward, rather than cold-deficiency. I urgently stopped the previous dose. Subsequently, I administered Huang Lian Jie Du Tang (Coptis Decoction to Relieve Toxicity) plus Bai Zhu for ten doses to resolve the heat from Ding Xiang. Diarrhea ceased, and pox erupted. Later, mild fever persisted, and boils appeared on hands and feet; after a month of cooling and tonifying therapy, he recovered.
Another case involved a male, sixteen or seventeen years old, suffering from fever, stupor, blindness, deafness, and large, slightly rapid pulses everywhere, indicating labor injury. At that time, smallpox was prevalent locally. I instructed him to consume strong decoctions of large doses of Ren Shen, Dang Gui (Angelica Sinensis), Bai Zhu, and Chen Pi (Tangerine Peel). After thirty-plus doses, pox began to emerge. After another twenty-plus doses, pustules formed, leaving no intact skin. Someone asked: The condition is terrifying; why not use Chen Shi's complete formula? I replied: This is merely deficiency without cold. Stick to the previous formula. After dozens more doses, he recovered. Inquiry revealed that four or five days prior, fearing smallpox, he had worked hard chopping wood, sweating profusely. Had Chen Shi's full formula been used, regret would surely follow. In the spring of Jiashen year of Zhizheng, Yang Qi moved early. In January, almost every household in the county had smallpox, all treated with Chen Shi's formulas, resulting in hundreds of child deaths. While partly due to Heaven's mandate, I fear human efforts were not exhaustive.
Commentary: Qian Yi discussed the color, shape, severity, and critical nature of smallpox, laying the groundwork for medication. Li Dongyuan (Jiegou) further differentiated concurrent syndromes, voice, respiration, form, and Qi to prescribe treatments, which was quite detailed. However, commoners fail to deeply appreciate the intent, leading to confusion. Hence, Danxi spoke at length. Generally, commoners prefer warmth over cold, distorting Qian Yi's methods. For example, "do not recklessly purge" implies caution; there are situations where purging is warranted. If early-stage pox fails to erupt due to interior excess, accompanied by thirst, rapid pulse, constipation, and irritability, is purging inappropriate? If near resolution, interior excess presents with thirst, constipation, and fever, is purging forbidden? Some say never purge, referring specifically to vomiting and diarrhea. One must adjust according to the patient's deficiency/excess and seasonal regulations, aiming for appropriateness. Thus, Qian Yi's emphasis on "observing the season" is crucial. In deep winter cold, cooling agents cannot be routinely used. Moreover, pediatric smallpox originates from toxins of the five Zang organs, not merely heart fire causing pain and itching. Therefore, Chen Shi's formulas often succeed. However, modern misuse of Qian Yi's formulas causes errors due to poor application, not flawed formulation. One should seek the original intent of balanced prescriptions. Seasonal qi varies in depth, and children differ in constitution; medication must not be taken lightly. Incorporating wind-dispelling herbs, as suggested by Jiegou, aids ascending and dispersing, requiring caution. Can all hot and aromatic penetrating herbs be used routinely? Cases of toxins sinking into orifices, muscles, bones, or sinews recovering with such methods exist but are rare (one in a thousand).
Furthermore, *Ming Yi Za Zhuo* notes that Danxi's smallpox treatment is most comprehensive. Recent popular formulas like Chen Wenzhong's Mu Xiang San and Yi Gong San are biased. They suit deficiency-cold types (weak, pale, itchy, collapsed pox). However, for heat-toxin types (high fever, abundant eruption, red-purple, dry, itchy), blood-cooling is urgent. Since Chen's formulas became popular, deficiency-cold cases survived, but heat-toxin cases died. Smallpox is fetal toxin; ancient methods focused on detoxification. If Qi and Blood are deficient, toxins cannot be expelled or matured. Thus, Chen's method obscured the principle of detoxification, saving one side while harming the other. Now, one must thoroughly study Danxi's methods for universal application without fault.