产后病治,尝见丹溪云∶“产后当大补气血,即有杂证,以末治之。一切病多是血虚,皆不可发表。”此
其意谓血气随胎而去,必属大虚,故无论诸证,皆当以大补为先,其他皆属可缓。余于初年诚然佩服,及执而
用之,则每为所困。经者数次,始悟其言虽有理而未免言之过也。即今产科所宗,无非此法,余目睹其误,及
亲为解救者,盖不少矣。故敢剖析于后,实有所见,不得不言,非存心自炫,故毁先贤。若然,则徒为笑骂之
招耳。宾虽至愚,必不为也。观者深察此意。
凡产后气血俱去,诚多虚证。然有虚者,有不虚者,有全实者。凡此三者,但当随证、随人,辨其虚
实,以常法治疗,不得执有诚心,概行大补,以致助邪。此辨不可不真也。
产后虚证,无非随人元气,必素弱之人多有之;或于产后血气俱去而更弱者亦有之。此当因人察脉,因脉
察证,若脉气、形气、病气俱不足,此当以全虚治之。若形气不足,病气有余,或兼火邪,或兼外邪,或以饮
食停滞,是亦虚中有实,不得不详审而治。此中委曲,未能言尽,惟明者悟之。
产后不虚证,盖或其素日无病,或以年少当时,或以素耐辛苦贫劳之质,此辈本无不足,及其一旦受
孕,乃于无病腹中参入此物,故致血气壅塞,为胀为呕,是皆添设有余之病。及其既产,始见通快,所留得
去,仍复故。吾常人之产,此类极多,果何虚之有?然或以内伤,或以外感,产后之病,难保必无。倘有所
犯,去之
即愈。若概行大补,果能堪否?即临盆带去血气,未免暂见耗损。然以壅滞之余,不过皆护胎随从之物。
去者当去,生者旋生,不出数日,必已来复,此生化自然之理,何至是产皆虚也?凡治此类,但当因证用治。
若执云“产后必当大补气血”,则实实之病必所不免。而轻者必甚,甚者必危矣。由此观之,则立言者固不
易,而用言者又岂易哉?
产后全实证∶有如外感风寒,头痛身热,便实中满,脉紧数洪大有力者,此表邪之实证也;又火之盛
者,必热渴躁烦,或便结腹胀,口鼻舌焦黑,酷喜冷冻饮料,眼哆尿管痛赤,脉见洪滑,此内热之实证也;又郁
怒动肝,胸胁胀痛,大便不利,脉弦而滑,此气逆之实证也;又恶露未尽,瘀血上冲,心腹胀满,疼痛拒按,
大便难而小便利,此血逆之实证也;又凡富贵之家,保护太过,或过用人参、 、术,以致气壅;或过用糖、
酒、炭火,以致内热;或产本不虚,而妄用大补之药,以致增病,此调摄之实证也;又或因产过食,恐其劳
困,固令勉强,以致停蓄不散,此内伤之实证也。以上诸证,姑举要者,以见其概。然既有表邪,则不得不
解;既有火邪,则不得不清;既有内伤停滞,则不得不开通消导。且人有强弱,产有虚实,病有真假,治有逆
从,固不可以同日语也。观《六元正纪大论》曰∶“妇人重身,毒之何如?曰∶有故无殒,亦无殒也。”此自
经常不易之大法,亦何庸赘辨之。若此第因丹溪之言,人多偏执,故不得不详尽其说,以解后人之惑也。诸虚
实治法,详具后条。
The treatment of postpartum diseases, I have seen Zhu Danxi say: "Postpartum patients should be greatly tonified in Qi and Blood; even if there are other miscellaneous syndromes, they should be treated as secondary. All diseases are mostly due to Blood deficiency, and none should be treated with diaphoresis (sweating method)." His meaning is that Qi and Blood depart with the fetus, necessarily belonging to extreme deficiency; therefore, regardless of various syndromes, great tonification should take precedence, while others can be deferred. In my early years, I indeed admired this view, but when I adhered to it, I was often trapped by it. After several cycles of experience, I realized that although his words had merit, they were somewhat too absolute. Currently, what obstetrics follows is nothing but this method. I have witnessed its errors and personally rescued cases, quite a number. Thus, I dare to analyze the following, truly having my own insights, and cannot help but speak; it is not out of a desire to show off or deliberately slander sages. If so, it would only invite ridicule and scolding. Although I am extremely foolish, I certainly would not do such a thing. Readers should deeply contemplate this intent.
Whenever Qi and Blood are lost after childbirth, there are indeed many deficiency syndromes. However, there are also non-deficiency cases, and fully excess cases. For these three types, one must differentiate deficiency and excess according to the syndrome and the individual, treating them by standard methods. One must not stubbornly believe that "postpartum is always deficient" and universally apply great tonification, thereby aiding pathogenic factors. This differentiation must be precise.
Postpartum deficiency syndromes are essentially linked to the person's original Qi; those who are constitutionally weak often suffer from this. Or, those whose Qi and Blood become even weaker after childbirth may also have this. Here, one must observe the pulse based on the individual, and examine the syndrome based on the pulse. If the pulse energy, form/energy, and disease energy are all insufficient, it should be treated as a total deficiency. If form/energy is insufficient but disease energy is sufficient, or if accompanied by Fire pathogen, external pathogen, or food stagnation, this is also deficiency with excess, requiring detailed examination and treatment. The complexities here cannot be fully expressed in words; only the enlightened can comprehend.
Postpartum non-deficiency syndromes generally occur because the person was healthy beforehand, or was young and strong at the time, or has a constitution accustomed to hardship and labor. These people originally lack nothing. When they become pregnant, they add the burden of the fetus to an otherwise healthy abdomen, causing Qi and Blood congestion, leading to distension and vomiting. These are all added "excess" conditions. Once delivery occurs, relief begins, the retained elements are expelled, and the body returns to normal. Among ordinary people's deliveries, such cases are very numerous; where is the deficiency? However, internal injury or external contraction can still cause postpartum illness; one cannot guarantee it never happens. If such pathogens are present, removing them leads to immediate recovery. If one universally applies great tonification, can the body truly endure it? Even though Qi and Blood are temporarily depleted during delivery, relative to the previous congestion, only the substances accompanying the fetus are removed. What leaves departs; what generates regenerates. Within a few days, restoration will surely occur. This is the natural law of bio-generation. Why assume all postpartum states are deficient? For treating such cases, one should treat according to the syndrome. If one stubbornly insists "postpartum must be greatly tonified in Qi and Blood," then real-excess conditions will inevitably remain untreated. Mild conditions will worsen, severe conditions will become critical. From this perspective, establishing theories is indeed difficult, but applying them is no easier either.
Fully excess postpartum syndromes: Such as external contraction of Wind-Cold, with headache, fever, constipation, abdominal fullness, and a tight, rapid, surging, large, and forceful pulse—this is an exterior excess syndrome. Another case involves excessive Fire, manifesting as heat, thirst, restlessness, irritability, constipation, abdominal distension, blackened dry mouth/nose/tongue, intense craving for cold drinks, copious eye discharge, painful red urination, and a surging slippery pulse—this is an interior Heat excess syndrome. Another involves Liver Qi rebellion triggered by depression and anger, with chest and hypochondriac pain/distension, difficulty in defecation, and a string-taut slippery pulse—this is a Qi reversal excess syndrome. Another involves incomplete expulsion of lochia, with blood stasis rushing upward, causing heart/abdominal distension/pain, tenderness upon pressure, difficult defecation but free urination—this is a Blood reversal excess syndrome. Another involves wealthy families providing excessive care, or overusing herbs like Renshen (Ginseng Radix) and Baizhu (Atractylodis Macrocephalae Rhizoma), leading to Qi congestion; or overusing sugar, alcohol, and charcoal fires, leading to interior Heat; or the birth itself was not deficient, but reckless use of great tonics increased the illness—this is an excess syndrome caused by improper nursing/care. Another involves overeating during labor, fearing fatigue, forcing consumption, leading to retention and stagnation—this is an interior injury excess syndrome. The above syndromes are merely key examples to show the general picture. Since there is an exterior pathogen, it must be resolved; since there is Fire pathogen, it must be cleared; since there is interior injury and stagnation, it must be unblocked and digested. Moreover, people vary in strength, births vary in deficiency/excess, diseases vary in true/false, and treatments vary in counteracting/following approaches. They certainly cannot be discussed as if identical. As stated in the *Suwen: Liuyuan Zhengji Dalun* ("Great Treatise on the Six Origins and Correct Ordinances"): "For a pregnant woman, how should toxic drugs be used? It is said: If there is a disease [pathology], the drug attacks the disease without harming [the mother/fetus], thus neither is harmed." This is an eternal, unchanging major principle. Why need further debate? I elaborate here only because people often rigidly adhere to Danxi's words, necessitating a detailed explanation to resolve later generations' confusion. Methods for treating various deficiencies and excesses are detailed in subsequent sections.