从来肿病。遍身头面俱肿。尚易治。若只单单腹肿。则为难治。此其间有所以然之故。不可不辨也。盖
传世诸方。皆是悍毒攻劫之法。伤耗元气。亏损脾胃。可一不可再之药。纵取效于一时。倘至复肿。则更
无法可疗。此其一也。且遍身俱肿者。五脏六腑。各有见证。故泻肝泻肺泻膀胱泻大小肠之药。间有取效
之时。而单单腹肿。则中州之地。久窒其四运之轴。而清者不升。浊者不降。互相结聚。牢不可破。实因脾
气之衰微所致。而泻脾之药。尚敢漫用乎。此又其一也。且肿病之可泻者。但可施
之西北壮盛。及田野农夫之流。岂膏粱老少之所能受。设谓肿
病为大满大实。必从乎泻。则病后肿与产后肿。将亦泻之耶。此又其一也。且古方原载肿病五不治。唇黑伤
肝。缺盆平伤心。脐出伤脾。背平伤肺。足底平满伤肾。此五者不可治矣。是其立方
之意。皆非为不可治之证而设。后人不察。概从攻泻者何耶。惟理脾一法。虽五脏见不治之证。而能治者
尚多。此又其一也。张子和以汗吐下三法。劫除百病。后人有谓子和之书。非子和之
笔。乃麻征君文之者。诚为知言。如常仲明云。世人以补剂疗病。宜乎不效。此则过信刘张之学。而罔顾元气
之羸劣耳。所以凡用劫夺之药者。其始非不遽消。其后攻之不消矣。其后再攻之如铁石矣。不知者见之。方
谓何物邪气。若此之盛。自明者观之。不过为猛药所攻。即以此身之元气。转与此身为难者。实有
如驱良民为寇之比。所谓赤子盗兵。弄于潢池。 其然哉。明乎
此。则有培养一法。补益元气是也。则有招纳一法。升举阳气是也。则有解散一法。开鬼门洁净府是也。
三法虽不言泻。而泻在其中矣。无余蕴矣。
胡卣臣先生曰。胀满必从乎泻。然善言泻者。补之中无非泻也。观者须识此意。始得立言之旨。
Since ancient times, edema affecting the whole body and head/face is relatively easy to treat. However, if only the abdomen is swollen, it becomes a difficult condition to treat. There are inherent reasons for this distinction that must not be overlooked.
The various prescriptions handed down through generations mostly employ harsh, toxic, and coercive methods of attack (Gongjie). These methods damage and deplete the Yuan Qi (Primary Vital Energy) and impair the Spleen and Stomach. They are medicines that should be used once but never again. Even if they achieve temporary efficacy, if the swelling recurs, there will be no further effective treatment available. This is the first reason.
Moreover, in cases of generalized edema, each of the Zang and Fu organs presents specific signs; therefore, herbs that drain the Liver, Lung, Bladder, Large Intestine, and Small Intestine can occasionally yield results. In contrast, isolated abdominal swelling indicates that the central pivot of transportation and transformation (Zhongzhou, referring to the Spleen/Stomach region) has been obstructed for a long time. Consequently, clear Yang fails to ascend, and turbid Yin fails to descend, leading to stubborn aggregation that is difficult to break apart. This is essentially caused by the decline of Spleen Qi. How dare one casually administer drugs that drain the Spleen? This is the second reason.
Furthermore, regarding edema that can be treated with draining methods, such approaches are only suitable for robust individuals from the Northwest or laborers in the fields. They are certainly not tolerated by those who consume rich foods, the elderly, the young, or the delicate. If one were to assert that edema represents a condition of great fullness and excess requiring draining, would post-illness edema and postpartum edema also be treated with draining methods? This is the third reason.
Additionally, ancient texts originally recorded five untreatable conditions for edema: black lips indicate injury to the Liver; a flat suprasternal notch (Quepen) indicates injury to the Heart; an everted umbilicus indicates injury to the Spleen; a flat back indicates injury to the Lung; and flat, full soles indicate injury to the Kidney. These five conditions are considered incurable. The intent behind formulating these prescriptions was not to address incurable syndromes. Why do later practitioners, failing to understand this, universally resort to attacking and draining methods?
Only the method of regulating the Spleen remains viable. Even when Zang and Fu organs present seemingly incurable signs, many cases can still be cured through this approach. This is the fourth reason.
Zhang Hezi advocated using the three methods of sweating, vomiting, and purging to eradicate myriad diseases. Later scholars have suggested that Zhang Hezi’s writings may not be his own work but rather authored by Master Ma Zhengjun. This is indeed an insightful observation. As Chang Zhongming stated, people believe that tonifying agents are ineffective for treating disease. This view stems from an excessive faith in the theories of Liu Wansu and Zhang Hezi, while ignoring the frailty of the Yuan Qi. Therefore, whenever coercive and draining drugs are used, although the swelling may subside rapidly at first, subsequent attacks fail to reduce it, and further attacks become as futile as striking iron or stone. Those who do not understand the pathology might attribute this persistence to the strength of pathogenic factors. However, from the perspective of those who comprehend medical principles, it is merely the result of harsh drugs attacking the body, causing the patient's own Yuan Qi to turn against them. It is akin to driving honest citizens to become bandits. As the saying goes, "Infants stealing weapons and playing in the moat," the situation is exactly like this.
Understanding this principle reveals three methods: the method of nurturing, which involves tonifying the Yuan Qi; the method of gathering, which involves raising the Yang Qi; and the method of dispersing, which involves opening the "ghost gates" (sweating pores) and cleansing the "clean mansion" (bladder/diuresis). Although these three methods do not explicitly mention "draining," the effect of draining is contained within them. Their essence is fully exhausted here.
Mr. Hu Youchen stated: "Abdominal distension must be treated with draining." However, those who truly understand "draining" know that within tonification lies the essence of draining. Readers must grasp this meaning to understand the author's intent.