肉苁蓉,味甘温而咸、酸,无毒。入肾。最善兴阳,止崩漏。久用令男女有子,暖腰膝。
但
专补肾中之水火,余无他用。若多用之,能滑大肠。古人所以治虚人大便结者,用苁蓉一两
,水洗出盐味,另用净水煮服,即下大便,正取其补虚而滑肠也。然虽补肾,而不可专用,
佐人参、白术、熟地、山茱萸诸补阴阳之药,实有利益。使人阳道修伟,与驴鞭同用更奇,
但不可用琐阳。盖琐阳非苁蓉可比,苁蓉,乃马精所化,故功性能神;琐阳,非马精所化之
物,虽能补阴兴阳,而功效甚薄,故神农薄而不取。近人舍苁蓉,而用琐阳,余所以分辨之
也。至于草苁蓉,尤不可用。凡用肉苁蓉,必须拣其肥大而有鳞甲者,始可用。否则,皆草
苁蓉而假充之者,买时必宜详察。
或问肉苁蓉既大补,又性温无毒,多用之正足补肾,何以反动大便?不知肉苁蓉肉,乃
马精
所化之物,马性最淫,故能兴阳。马精原系肾中所出,故又益阴。然而马性又最动,故骤用
之多,易动大便,非其味滑也。(〔批〕近情切理之言。)
或问肉苁蓉之动大便,恐是攻剂,而非补药也?夫苁蓉,乃有形之精所生,实补而非泻。
试
观老人不能大便者,用之以通大便。夫老人之闭结,乃精血之不足,非邪火之有余也,不可
以悟其是补而非攻乎。
或疑肉苁蓉性滑而动大便,凡大肠滑者,可用乎,抑不可用乎?夫大肠滑者,多由于肾
中之
无火,肉苁蓉兴阳,是补火之物也,补火而独不能坚大肠乎。故骤用之而滑者,久用之而自
涩矣。
或疑肉苁蓉,未必是马精所生,此物出之边塞沙土中,岁岁如草之生,安得如许之马精
耶?
曰∶肉苁蓉,是马精所生,非马精所生,吾何由定。但此说,实出于神农之《本草》,非后
人之私臆也,肉苁蓉不得马精之气,而生于苦寒边塞之外,又何能兴阳而补水火哉。
或问王好古曾云∶“服苁蓉以治肾,必妨于心”,何子未识也?曰∶此好古不知苁蓉,而妄
诫之也。凡补肾之药,必上通于心,心得肾之精,而后无焦枯之患。苁蓉大补肾之精,即补
心之气也,又何妨之有。(〔批〕实是。)
Cistanche (Rou Cong Rong), with a sweet, warm flavor and notes of salty and sour, is non-toxic. It enters the Kidney meridian. It excels at invigorating Yang and stopping metrorrhagia and metrostaxis (abnormal uterine bleeding). Long-term use enables men and women to conceive offspring and warms the waist and knees.
However, it specifically tonifies the water and fire (Yin and Yang) within the Kidney, having no other uses. If used in large doses, it can cause lubrication of the Large Intestine. The ancients treated constipation in deficient patients by using one liang of Cistanche, washing off the saline taste, boiling it in clean water, and administering it orally, which would induce bowel movement; this precisely utilizes its ability to tonify deficiency while lubricating the intestines. Nevertheless, although it tonifies the Kidney, it should not be used exclusively. When combined with herbs such as Ginseng Radix et Rhizoma (Renshen), Atractylodis Macrocephalae Rhizoma (Baizhu), Rehmanniae Radix Praeparata (Shudi), and Corni Fructus (Shanzhuyu)—herbs that tonify Yin and Yang—it yields substantial benefits. It makes the male organ robust and magnificent; when used together with Donkey Penis (Lv Bian), the effect is even more remarkable. However, Euryale Seed (Suo Yang) should not be used. This is because Suo Yang cannot compare to Cistanche; Cistanche is transformed from horse essence, thus possessing miraculous efficacy, whereas Suo Yang is not derived from horse essence. Although it can tonify Yin and invigorate Yang, its efficacy is very weak, so it was despised and excluded by Shennong in the *Shennong Bencao Jing*. In recent times, people have abandoned Cistanche in favor of Suo Yang, which is why I distinguish between them. As for Grass Cistanche (Cao Rou Cong Rong), it must absolutely not be used. Whenever using Cistanche, one must select specimens that are plump and possess scales; only then are they suitable for medicinal use. Otherwise, they are likely Grass Cistanche passed off as genuine, so careful inspection is necessary at the time of purchase.
A question arises: Since Cistanche is highly tonifying, warm in nature, and non-toxic, why does excessive use, which should benefit the Kidney, instead cause loose stools? One must understand that the fleshy part of Cistanche is a substance transformed from horse essence. Horses have a most lustful nature, hence Cistanche can invigorate Yang. Horse essence originates from the Kidney, hence it also nourishes Yin. However, the nature of horses is also most active/restless; therefore, sudden and heavy use easily disturbs the bowels, not because of its slippery taste. ([Commentary] This is a statement consistent with human nature and logical reasoning.)
Another question: Does Cistanche’s tendency to loosen the bowels suggest it is a purgative rather than a tonic? Cistanche is born from tangible essence, truly tonifying rather than draining. Observe elderly patients suffering from constipation; using Cistanche to unblock their bowels reveals that their obstruction stems from insufficiency of essence and blood, not from an excess of pathogenic fire. Can we not deduce from this that it is a tonic and not an attack?
Another doubt: Given that Cistanche is slippery and moves the bowels, can it be used for those with already slippery intestines, or is it contraindicated? Those with slippery intestines often suffer from a lack of Fire in the Kidney. Cistanche invigorates Yang and is a substance that tonifies Fire. How could tonifying Fire fail to firm up the Large Intestine? Thus, while sudden use may cause slipperiness, long-term use will naturally lead to astringency.
Another skepticism: Is Cistanche necessarily produced from horse essence? This herb grows in the sandy soil of border regions year after year like grass; how can there be enough horse essence for this?
The answer is: Cistanche is generated from horse essence. Whether it is or not, how could I determine it? But this theory actually originates from Shennong’s *Bencao Jing*, not from later personal speculation. If Cistanche did not receive the Qi of horse essence, growing in the bitter cold beyond the borders, how could it invigorate Yang and tonify Water and Fire?
A question asks: Wang Haogu once said, “Taking Cistanche to treat the Kidney will inevitably hinder the Heart.” Why have you overlooked this? The response is: This is Wang Haogu’s ignorant and reckless warning due to his lack of understanding of Cistanche. Any herb that tonifies the Kidney must communicate upward to the Heart. Only when the Heart receives the essence of the Kidney can it avoid the affliction of dryness and withering. Cistanche greatly tonifies the essence of the Kidney, which is equivalent to tonifying the Qi of the Heart. What hindrance could there possibly be? ([Commentary] Indeed true.)