金钗石斛,味甘、微苦,性微寒,无毒。不可用竹斛、木斛,用之无功,石斛却惊定志,
益
精强阴,尤能健脚膝之力,善起痹病,降阴虚之火,大有殊功。今世吴下之医,颇喜用之,
而天下人尚不悉知其功用也。盖金钗石斛,生于粤闽岩洞之中
,岩洞乃至阴之地,而粤闽又至阳之方也,秉阴阳之气以生,故寒不为寒,而又能降虚浮之
热。夫虚火,相火也,相火宜补,而不宜泻。金钗石斛妙是寒药,而又有补性,且其性又下
行,而不上行。若相火则易升,而不易降者也,得石斛则降而不升矣。夏月之间,两足无力
者,服石斛则有力,岂非下降而兼补至阴之明验乎。故用黄柏、知母泻相火者,何如用金钗
石斛之为当乎。盖黄柏、知母泻中无补,而金钗石斛补中有泻也。
或问金钗石斛降阴虚之火,乃泻阴之物也,何以能健脚膝之力,其中妙义,尚未畅发。
曰∶
肾有补而无泻,何以金钗石斛泻肾,而反补肾,宜子之疑也。余上文虽已略言之,而今犹当
罄言之。夫肾中有水、火之分,水之不足,火之有余也;火之有余,水之不足也。是水火不
能两平者,久矣。脚膝之无力者,肾水之不足也。水不足则火觉有余,火有余则水又不足,
不能制火矣。不能制火,则火旺而熬干骨中之髓,欲其脚膝之有力也。必不得之数矣。金钗
石斛,本非益精强阴之药,乃降肾中命门虚火之药也,去火之有余,自然益水之不足,泻肾
中之虚火,自然添骨中之真水矣,故曰∶强阴而益精。此脚膝之所以健也。然则黄柏、知母
亦泻肾火之药,何以不能健脚膝?不知肾中之火,大寒则泻而不补,微寒则补而能泻。此金
钗石斛妙在微寒,以泻为补也。(〔批〕相火者,虚火也,虚火必补而后息。石斛之补肾,
岂
及熟地,然以轻虚之体,潜入于命门阴火之中,能引入命门之火,仍归于肾,舍石斛更无他
药可代。大寒之药,有泻而无补;微寒之药,有补而无泻,发前人所未发。)
或问子恶用黄柏、知母之泻火,何又称金钗石斛?不知金钗石斛,非知母、黄柏可比。
知母
、黄柏大寒,直入于至阴,使寒入于骨髓之中。金钗石斛不过微寒,虽入于至阴,使寒出于
骨髓之外,各有分别也。
或疑金钗石斛使寒出于骨髓,实发前人之未发,但无征难信耳。曰∶石斛微寒,自不伤
骨,
骨既不伤,则骨中之热自解,骨中热解,必散于外,此理之所必然,不必有征而后信也。
Jincha Shihu (Dendrobium nobile), with a sweet and slightly bitter taste, is of a slightly cold nature and non-toxic. It should not be confused with Zhuxu (Bamboo Dendrobium) or Muxu (Wood Dendrobium); using them yields no efficacy. Shihu can calm fright and stabilize the spirit, benefit essence and strengthen Yin, and particularly possesses the power to strengthen the feet and knees. It is excellent for treating Bi syndrome (obstruction syndrome characterized by pain, heaviness, or numbness), descending fire due to Yin deficiency, and holds great special merit. Physicians in the Wu region (Jiangsu and Zhejiang areas) nowadays favor its use, yet people throughout the world do not fully understand its functions. This is because Jincha Shihu grows in rock caves in Guangdong and Fujian. Rock caves are places of extreme Yin, while Guangdong and Fujian are regions of extreme Yang. Born from inheriting the Qi of both Yin and Yang, its cold nature is not excessively cold, and it can descend floating heat. The so-called deficient fire refers to Ministerial Fire (Xianghuo). Ministerial fire is suitable for tonification rather than purgation. The subtlety of Jincha Shihu lies in the fact that although it is a cold herb, it also has tonifying properties, and its action moves downward rather than upward. Ministerial fire tends to ascend easily but descend with difficulty; with Shihu, it descends and does not ascend. During summer, when one's legs feel weak, taking Shihu restores strength. Is this not clear evidence of its ability to descend and simultaneously tonify Extreme Yin? Therefore, using Huangbai (Phellodendron Bark) and Zhimu (Anemarrhena Rhizome) to purge Ministerial fire is far less appropriate than using Jincha Shihu. Huangbai and Zhimu purge without tonifying, whereas Jincha Shihu tonifies while purging.
One might ask: Since Jincha Shihu descends fire due to Yin deficiency, it is a substance that drains Yin. How can it then strengthen the power of the feet and knees? The profound meaning here has not been fully elucidated. I reply: The Kidney is subject only to tonification, never to purgation. Why does Jincha Shihu drain the Kidney yet conversely tonify it? Your doubt is understandable. Although I briefly mentioned this earlier, I shall now explain it thoroughly. Within the Kidney, there is a distinction between Water and Fire. Insufficiency of Water leads to excess Fire; excess Fire leads to insufficiency of Water. The inability of Water and Fire to remain in balance has long existed. Weakness in the feet and knees stems from an insufficiency of Kidney Water. When Water is insufficient, Fire feels excessive; when Fire is excessive, Water becomes even more insufficient, failing to control the Fire. If Fire cannot be controlled, it flares up and boils dry the marrow within the bones. Under such conditions, expecting strength in the feet and knees is impossible. Jincha Shihu is not originally a medicine for directly benefiting essence and strengthening Yin; rather, it is a medicine that descends the deficient fire of the Mingmen (Gate of Life) in the Kidney. By removing the excess Fire, it naturally supplements the insufficient Water. By draining the deficient fire in the Kidney, it naturally replenishes the true Water in the bones. Hence it is said to "strengthen Yin and benefit essence." This is why the feet and knees become strong. Then, since Huangbai and Zhimu are also medicines that drain Kidney Fire, why can they not strengthen the feet and knees? One must understand that for Kidney Fire, herbs of Great Cold nature purge without tonifying, whereas herbs of Slightly Cold nature tonify while purging. The subtlety of Jincha Shihu lies in its Slightly Cold nature, achieving tonification through purgation. [Commentary: Ministerial fire is deficient fire; deficient fire must be tonified to subside. The effect of Shihu in tonifying the Kidney does not compare to Shudi (Prepared Rehmannia Root). However,凭借其 light and empty nature, it penetrates into the Yin fire of the Mingmen, guiding the fire of the Mingmen back to the Kidney. No other herb can replace Shihu. Herbs of Great Cold nature have purgative effects but no tonifying effects; herbs of Slightly Cold nature have tonifying effects but no purgative effects. This insight was not previously developed.]
One might ask: You dislike the use of Huangbai and Zhimu for purging fire, so why do you praise Jincha Shihu? You do not realize that Jincha Shihu cannot be compared to Zhimu and Huangbai. Zhimu and Huangbai are of Great Cold nature, entering directly into Extreme Yin, causing cold to penetrate deep into the bone marrow. Jincha Shihu is merely Slightly Cold; although it enters Extreme Yin, it expels cold from outside the bone marrow. There is a distinct difference between them.
Some may suspect that Jincha Shihu expelling cold from the bone marrow is indeed a novel theory not previously expressed, but lacking evidence makes it hard to believe. I reply: Because Shihu is Slightly Cold, it naturally does not damage the bones. If the bones are not damaged, the heat within the bones naturally resolves. Once the heat in the bones resolves, it necessarily dissipates outward. This is logically inevitable and does not require empirical evidence to be believed.