卫气营血的辨证方法,最早开始运用者为张仲景,如《伤寒论》53条明文指出:“病常自汗出者,此为营气和,营气租者,外不谐,以卫气不共营气谐和故尔”,所以时逸人说:“太阳篇中,已包括营卫气血,不能将营卫气血,剔出于太阳范围之外。”在这一问题上,叶氏也具有同样的看法,故尽管叶派中人,为与仲景学说分庭抗礼而颇多刻意罗织、甚不顾事实之议论(如鞠通及朱彬、汪廷珍等人,都硬说《伤寒论》只是一部论狭义伤寒的书等),但叶氏承认仲景也用卫气营血来辨外感,因此,叶氏只强调温病“治法与伤寒大异”,而“辨卫气营血(虽)与伤寒同。”然而,这实际上又要一个明显的错误,因为叶氏“四层”的浅深程次是“卫之后方言气,营之后方言血,”是卫最浅,气稍深,入营更重。叶氏所说的营分病变已明显地比气分病为甚,故卫分病先传气,再传营,这样逐步的加重,算是顺传,如卫分直入营分,突然的加重,就是逆传,所以叶氏在治疗上主张,“入营犹可透热转气。”而《伤寒论》卫气营血的浅深层次是营在气之前,营分病比气分病为轻,故太阳病的经(表)证即有伤营、伤卫,二伤营卫之说;而腑(里)证才有用五苓散治气分,用抵当汤治血分的疗法。说明营卫趋表而浅,气血主里而深,所以邪在太阳,一开始就可以有营分病,仲景主以调和营卫之桂枝汤。桂枝汤在《温病条辨》中是吴氏用以治温病初起恶风寒之首方,叶氏所说的营分病,则根本不能用这张方治疗,说明叶氏之辨卫气营血,与仲景之辨卫气营血异,近之温热家以卫气营血为热病辨证纲领,宗法叶氏,故营分病比气分病重,此法系叶氏所创,然叶氏偏说“辨营卫气血与伤寒同”,这就经不得推敲。
三、治法只有小异
“清代医家如叶天士、王孟英、吴鞠通诸氏,确实主张温病与伤寒对立。”①叶氏在《温热论》中说温病“冶法与伤寒大异”,就是这种主张的反映。但治法实际上只有小异,并无大异。伤寒家和温病家,对于外感热病的认识,虽然有许多不同,然论治法,仅在初起时有所出入。我们知道,所谓伤寒,有广狭二义,广义伤寒,包括了温病,《伤寒论》之于温病,虽理略而未详,法简而末备,但已开清热养阴治热病之法门,亦为后世温病学派赖以发展之基础。广义伤寒所包括在内的温病,与叶‘吴所说之温病,因为是同一个对象,故古今治法虽详略有殊,而原则一致,所以温热家之治温要方,如白虎、承气之类,都是从《伤寒论》中来。就狭义伤寒来说,其初虽与温病相对立,但化热之后,治法也完全相一致,如金寿山就说:“伤寒与温病治法之异,主要在初起见表证时,至于化热之后,都应该凉解,出入就不大了。”④陶节庵也说温病“表证不与正伤寒同治,里证同。”说明即狭义伤寒,化热传里之后,治法亦即与温病不殊。如谓伤寒始终当重视救阳,温病始终应重视救阴,则是一种错觉。所谓“仲景伤寒,法在救阳,叶吴温病,法在救阴”,这只是后人的一种见解,实则《伤寒’论》对于存津液也很为重视,因为对象相同,则正确处理,其原则上总大体相一致,而不可能始终两途、截然不同的。故若谓狭义伤寒与温病,初起用药,有宜凉宜温之大异,尚可。若泛谓伤寒温病治法右大异,则不可。2003-9-1422:23:50北海散人头衔:佛门弟子等级:管理员文章:3797积分:4270注册:2002-12-24
第2楼
四、温病亦多传变
伤寒家好称外感热病为伤寒,温热家好称外感热病为温病,这是旧时医家之习惯。但同样的一种疾病,同样的一个对象,其传变若非药物治疗等原因之影响,它必按照着自己一定的规律而发展,决无称它为伤寒就多传变,称它为温病就少传变的道理。寒温之争在病因,病因观点的争执,诚如陈苏生老中医所说,事实上就是“用药方法上的争执”(《温热管窥》)这种争执,都无非是为了说明自己治疗主张的正确,并不是说客观上确实存在着寒与温这二类各自按不同规律发展的热病。即退一步说,叶氏既云“伤寒多有变证,温热既久,在一经不移,以此为辨。”又云“三焦不得从外解,必致成里结,里结于何,在阳明胃与肠也。”这本身就已自相矛盾了。但崇拜叶氏的人总是曲为之释,如章虚谷,他说:“伤寒先受于是经,是经脉长而多传变,温邪先受于手经,手经脉短,故少传变。”说得好象手太阴肺经根本就不存在有寒证,寒邪就只会伤足经。又如周学海,他说“寒邪为敛,其入以渐,进一境即转一象,故变证多;温邪为开,重门洞辟,初病常兼二三经,再传而六经已毕,故变证少。”叶氏之说,奉无以自圆,要粉饰其矛盾,解释的使人信服,当然不是易事,故章、周二人之说,都不能使后人满意,故《温病学》说章虚谷“对伤寒多传变,温病少传变,说理甚为牵强,颇难令人信服。”并认为周学海之说,亦未必尽然,因为“温邪初起如兼有二三经的证候,其病情大多较为严重复杂,证候演变亦是变化多端。这怎能认为是变证少呢?因此周氏这段解释的理由是不充分的。”但谈醇不谈疵,言瑜不言瑕,这几乎已成为历来注《温热论》者之传统,故《温病学》的编者,亦但对章、周二人之注释表示不满,而对叶氏原文,也是丝毫的不加指谪,这与不满《伤寒论》中某些条文而只是指谪王叔和的方法一样,确是一种避免受数典忘祖指责的好方法,但这样一来,《温热论》也难免给人有一种字字金玉的错觉。实则按叶氏自己所说,温病初起在手太阴,逆传则入心包,顺传则入阳明,也可流连于三焦,虚则内陷入少阴(实则六经俱可涉及),既然并非不变不移,孰能教人据此以作为判断是伤寒还是温病之依据?!故多变不变之论,人谓堪称经验之谈,余谓最是无稽之说,谢诵穆也曾对此进行过驳斥,可谓是先得我心。
五、早用血药亦非动手就错
叶氏分卫气营血用药,划界颇严,他说:“卫之后方言气、营之后方言血。在卫汗之可也,到气才可清气,入营犹可透热转气,”“入血就恐耗血动血,”“否则前后不循缓急之法,虑其动手便错。”按照“到气才可清气”之说,不用说表证用血药,即气药亦不可骤用,但实则不然,桂枝汤之桂、芍,都是,血分药,吴氏竟以之为《温病条辨》之首方,这本身就说明了叶吴学说之矛盾。后人批评吴氏用桂枝汤之不妥,主要是指责他以温治温,余谓按照叶氏之说,还要批评他早用血药,背前后不循缓急之训。但实际上在卫分时用了血分药,不能说是一种过失。伤寒表证可以用血分药,温病表证也未必。须忌血分药,叶氏制订这一清规戒律,本身就不符合“见肝之病,知肝传脾,当先实脾”之原则,既然见到卫分证而知道它将向气分、营分、血分步步深入,为什么必须“到气才可清气”呢?为什么不可以按照见肝治脾的原则,来一个子治其气,予治其营,不使气分、营分证出现,在卫分时就解决它呢?“姜老治疗温病,不拘泥于‘卫之后方言气,营之后方言血,’‘到气才可清气’的顺应疗法,主张先证而治。”⑤这种治疗主张,使人很受启发,但在迷信叶氏学说的人,则是不敢想象的。祝味菊曾说:“医之为工,工于救逆,”叶氏学说指导温热病的治疗,就截断逆转来说,效果还不能令人满意,我们为什么必须匍伏其下,诚惶诚恐,不能越雷池一步呢!推陈致新,不断捉高疗效,是时代发展提出的要求,我们在理论与实践二个方面,都须勤加探索,理论上不宜因循守旧,泥于一家之说,临床上要从实际出发,以避免用药路子太窄,过去聂云台治肠伤寒(湿温),一开始就用大黄血药,亦有良效。近人“以活血化淤,通里攻下,清热解毒法治疗52例流行性出血热,全部治愈,特别是早期应用活血化淤药,具有增加吞噬细胞能力和增强网状内皮系统的活力的作用,对改善微循环,防止弥漫性血管内凝血等可能有所裨益。”⑥这些实例,说明温热病在早期使用血分药,也决非是“动手便错”,相反,明知卫将传气而不予治气,心知气将入血而不先治血,必待气分证出现始用气分药,必待血分证出现才用血分药,这种治法,尾随于病变之后而投药,说者每谓有是证,用是药,这是辨证论治,实际上并不符合“上工治未病”之原则,故并不真正符合辨证论治的精神。
六、营分受热不必即撤去气药
《温热论》“营分受热,则血液受劫,心神不定,夜甚无寐,或斑点隐隐,即撤去气药。如从风热陷入者,用犀角、竹叶之属;如从湿热陷入者,犀角、花露之品,参入凉血清热方中。”这段文字,理论上自相矛盾,临床上不符实际,根本不足以为训。若盲目尊信,为之曲释,恐不免“头脑蹒跚,不可几及”之诮。因就《温热论》来看,所谓卫分药,是指薄荷牛蒡之属;所谓气分药,是指竹叶、花露之品,所谓营分药,是指犀角、玄参之类;所谓血分药,则如生地、丹皮等物(实际上营分、血分药很难划分,如叶氏清营,常用生地)。叶氏戒人即撤去气药的同时,又教人用竹叶、花露等气药,其说之无以自圆,何等的明显!再则叶氏说“入营犹可透热转气”。所谓“入营犹可透热转气”,就是在用清营药的同时,继续使用银、翘、芩、连等气分药,以冀入营之邪热仍从气分透出而解。叶氏治热入营血的神犀丹之所以用了银花,连翘,黄芩、天花粉等许多气分药。吴鞠通治邪热入营的清营汤之所以也用银、翘、麦冬、竹叶、黄连等许多的气分药,就都是这个道理。如营分受热,就须即撤去气药,请问“入营犹可透热转气”之药法,何以解释?何以理解?由上述可见,“透热转气”与“撤去气药”二说,实难以并存。再从《临证指南·温热门》的医案来看,温病见营分证者,无论是伏气自内而发,还是新感从外而入。无论是气分邪热初传入营,还是气营之热势正两燔,叶氏均不曾撤去气药。如毛六十案,病机是温邪热入营中,治疗用生地、麦冬、杏仁、郁金汁、炒川贝、橘红,即此一案,已足说明“即撤去气药”说,理论与实践脱节。诸此类案,温热门中不少,如马案为少阴伏邪,治疗仍用竹叶、连翘,以冀血中伏邪透热转气,如某案为气血两燔,治疗用知、膏、竹叶清气热,如陈妪案为营中之热,治疗中也用了连翘、竹叶,茯神、远志、菖蒲等气分药。相反,邪初入营,叶氏有时不用一味营分药,竟全用清气药。如某案,病系春温,舌绛,营热有据,但所用之药如竹叶心、知母,花粉、滑石、生甘草、梨皮等六味,无一属营分药。笔者认为:营分受热,血液受劫之后,不可再单用气分药,须顾及营分,酌加清营凉血之晶,这是必要的。而即撤去气药,是不必要的。叶氏治是这样的治,说又是那样的说,《温热论》于尺幅之中,竟常矛盾若是,所以后人怀疑是顾景文凭记录作《温证论治》时,已不尽合符叶氏之原意。后人如必欲以《温热论》句句为叶氏之本意,则叶氏就不得辞其咎。
七、湿温无转疟之机括
前人在治疗温病湿病过程中,有时碰到原病缠绵棘手,后来偶因病人复患疟疾,随着疟疾的治愈,原病亦瘥。于是误认为是原病化疟了。又因疟疾辨证有属湿属温的,于是便确信湿温病可以化为疟疾。《温热论》“……因其仍在气分,犹可望其战汗之门户,转疟之机括。”以及《临证指南》“温邪兼雨湿,外搏为疟。”(疟门吴案)“此湿温客气为疟”(同书曹案)等这些文字,我们只要结合着看,就不准了解叶氏之观点。章虚谷认为湿温病只要展其气机,用“杏、朴、温胆之类,辛平甘苦以利升降而转气机,开战汗之门户,为化疟之丹头。”王孟英认为“转疟之机括一言,原指气机通达,病乃化疟,则为邪杀也。”显然,这样随文生训,都是以讹传讹。湿温自是湿温,疟疾自是疟疾,这二种病无互相转化之可能。具有现代医学知识的人,懂得前人这种认识之荒谬,所以现在都采用转变成疟状来解释,这种措词上的巧妙变化,说明了后人的认识已比前人正确,也反映出注释人对叶氏的崇拜。但后人的这种知识,不能说明正是叶氏原文的本意。叶氏说湿温能转疟,章,王等人况湿温会化疟,这是前人对疾病的一种错误认识,对此不实事求是、明明白白的指出,初学者就难免仍会受其说之影响。故湿温转化成疟之说,实亦《温热论》之瑕疵。
八,舌生芒刺,决非皆是上焦热极
The syndrome differentiation method of Wei (Defensive), Qi, Ying (Nutritive), and Xue (Blood) was first applied by Zhang Zhongjing. For instance, Article 53 of the *Shanghan Lun* (Treatise on Cold Pathogenic Diseases) explicitly states: "When a patient frequently sweats spontaneously, this indicates that the Ying Qi is harmonious, but the exterior is discordant because the Wei Qi does not harmonize with the Ying Qi." Therefore, Shi Yisen said: "The Taiyang chapter already includes Wei, Ying, Qi, and Blood; one cannot extract Wei, Ying, Qi, and Blood from the scope of Taiyang." Ye Tianshi held the same view on this issue. Thus, although followers of the Ye school engaged in deliberate fabrications and disregarded facts to rival Zhang Zhongjing's theory (such as Ju Tong, Zhu Bin, and Wang Tingzhen insisting that the *Shanghan Lun* only discusses narrow-sense Shanghan), Ye Tianshi acknowledged that Zhang Zhongjing also used Wei, Ying, Qi, and Blood to differentiate external contractions. Consequently, Ye Tianshi only emphasized that the treatment methods for Wenbing (Warm Diseases) are "greatly different" from those for Shanghan, while the differentiation of Wei, Ying, Qi, and Blood is "the same" as in Shanghan. However, this actually contains an obvious error. Because Ye Tianshi's sequence of depth in the "four levels" is "after Wei comes Qi, after Ying comes Xue," meaning Wei is the shallowest, Qi is slightly deeper, and entering Ying is heavier. The Ying-level lesions described by Ye Tianshi are clearly more severe than Qi-level diseases. Therefore, if Wei-level disease transmits to Qi first, then to Ying, gradually worsening, it is considered Shun Chuan (sequential transmission); if Wei-level disease directly enters Ying with sudden worsening, it is Ni Chuan (reverse transmission). Thus, in treatment, Ye Tianshi advocated, "Even when entering Ying, one can still penetrate the heat back to Qi." In contrast, the depth sequence of Wei, Ying, Qi, and Blood in the *Shanghan Lun* places Ying before Qi, where Ying-level disease is lighter than Qi-level disease. Thus, in Taiyang disease, the Jing (meridian/exterior) stage involves injuries to Ying or Wei, or both; only the Fu (organ/interior) stage uses Wuling San to treat Qi level and Didang Tang to treat Blood level. This shows that Ying and Wei tend toward the exterior and are shallow, while Qi and Blood govern the interior and are deep. Therefore, when pathogenic factors are in Taiyang, Ying-level disease can occur from the beginning, and Zhang Zhongjing primarily used Guizhi Tang (Cinnamon Twig Decoction) to harmonize Ying and Wei. In the *Wenbing Tiaobian* (Systematic Differentiation of Warm Diseases), Wu Jutong used Guizhi Tang as the primary formula for early-stage Wenbing with aversion to wind and cold. However, Ye Tianshi's Ying-level disease could fundamentally not be treated with this formula. This demonstrates that Ye Tianshi's differentiation of Wei, Ying, Qi, and Blood differs from Zhang Zhongjing's. Later warm disease practitioners adopted Wei, Ying, Qi, and Blood as the guideline for differentiating febrile diseases, following Ye Tianshi's method, so Ying-level disease is considered heavier than Qi-level disease. This method was created by Ye Tianshi, yet he insisted that "differentiating Ying, Wei, Qi, and Blood is the same as Shanghan," which cannot withstand scrutiny.
III. Treatment Methods Differ Only Slightly
"Qing dynasty physicians such as Ye Tianshi, Wang Mengying, and Wu Jutong indeed advocated that Wenbing and Shanghan are opposed."① Ye Tianshi's statement in the *Wenre Lun* (Treatise on Warm Heat) that Wenbing treatment methods are "greatly different" from Shanghan reflects this advocacy. However, in reality, the treatment methods differ only slightly, not greatly. Although Shanghan and Wenbing schools have many differences in understanding external febrile diseases, their discussion of treatment methods only diverges at the initial stage. We know that Shanghan has broad and narrow meanings. Broad-sense Shanghan includes Wenbing. Although the *Shanghan Lun* is brief and incomplete regarding Wenbing principles and methods, it opened the door for clearing heat and nourishing Yin to treat febrile diseases, serving as the foundation for the development of later Wenbing schools. Since the Wenbing included in broad-sense Shanghan and the Wenbing mentioned by Ye and Wu refer to the same object, although ancient and modern treatment methods vary in detail, their principles are consistent. Therefore, essential formulas for treating warmth by warm disease practitioners, such as Baihu Tang (White Tiger Decoction) and Chengqi Tang (Descending Qi Decoction), all originate from the *Shanghan Lun*. Regarding narrow-sense Shanghan, although initially opposed to Wenbing, after transforming into heat, the treatment methods become completely consistent. Jin Shoushan stated: "The difference between Shanghan and Wenbing treatment lies mainly in the initial appearance of exterior syndromes; after transforming into heat, both should be cooled and resolved, with little variation."④ Tao Jian'an also said that for Wenbing, "exterior syndromes are not treated like proper Shanghan, but interior syndromes are the same." This shows that even for narrow-sense Shanghan, after heat transforms and transmits to the interior, the treatment is no different from Wenbing. To claim that Shanghan always emphasizes saving Yang and Wenbing always emphasizes saving Yin is an illusion. The saying "Zhang Zhongjing's Shanghan focuses on saving Yang, Ye and Wu's Wenbing focuses on saving Yin" is merely a later interpretation. In fact, the *Shanghan Lun* also highly values preserving body fluids. Since the object is the same, correct handling implies that principles are generally consistent, and they cannot always follow two completely different paths. Therefore, it is acceptable to say that there are significant differences in using cooling or warming drugs at the initial stage of narrow-sense Shanghan versus Wenbing. However, it is incorrect to broadly state that Shanghan and Wenbing treatment methods are largely different. [Date/User Info omitted]
IV. Wenbing Also Involves Many Transmissions
Shanghan practitioners prefer to call external febrile diseases Shanghan, while warm disease practitioners prefer to call them Wenbing; this is a habit of old-time physicians. But for the same disease and the same object, unless influenced by drug treatment or other reasons, its transmission must develop according to its own certain laws. There is no logic that calling it Shanghan means more transmissions, while calling it Wenbing means fewer transmissions. The dispute between Cold and Warmth lies in etiology. As the old TCM doctor Chen Suseng said, the dispute over etiological views is essentially a "dispute over medication methods" (*Wenre Guankui*). These disputes are nothing more than to prove the correctness of one's own treatment proposals, not to say that objectively there exist two types of febrile diseases, Cold and Warmth, developing according to different laws. Even stepping back, Ye Tianshi said, "Shanghan often has complicated changes; after Warmth persists for a long time, it remains in one meridian without moving, using this to differentiate." Yet he also said, "If the Sanjiao cannot resolve from the exterior, it must lead to interior knotting. Where is this interior knotting? It is in the Yangming Stomach and Intestines." This itself is contradictory. However, worshippers of Ye Tianshi always interpret it forcibly. For example, Zhang Xugu said: "Shanghan is first received in this meridian; since the meridian is long, it transmits and changes often. Warm pathogens are first received in the hand meridians; since hand meridians are short, they transmit and change less." This sounds as if the Hand-Taiyin Lung Meridian never has cold syndromes, and cold pathogens only injure foot meridians. Similarly, Zhou Xuehai said: "Cold pathogens are constricting; they enter gradually, changing manifestation with each stage, hence many complications; Warm pathogens are opening; heavy gates are wide open, so early illness often involves two or three meridians, and after two transmissions, the six meridians are exhausted, hence few complications." Ye Tianshi's words cannot justify themselves. To whitewash contradictions and make explanations convincing is certainly not easy. Thus, the theories of Zhang and Zhou do not satisfy later generations. The *Wenbingxue* (Science of Warm Diseases) states that Zhang Xugu's explanation for "Shanghan having many transmissions and Wenbing having few" is very forced and hardly convincing. It also believes Zhou Xuehai's view is not entirely accurate because "if early Wenbing symptoms involve two or three meridians, the condition is mostly serious and complex, and syndrome evolution is also diverse. How can this be considered few complications? Therefore, Zhou's reasoning is insufficient." Discussing only merits and ignoring flaws, speaking only of jade and ignoring stones, has almost become the tradition of commentators on the *Wenre Lun*. Thus, the editors of *Wenbingxue*, while dissatisfied with Zhang and Zhou's annotations, did not criticize Ye Tianshi's original text at all. This is similar to criticizing only Wang Shuhe's methods for certain articles in the *Shanghan Lun*, which is indeed a good way to avoid accusations of forgetting one's ancestors. However, this makes the *Wenre Lun* give people an illusion of being flawless gold and jade. In reality, according to Ye Tianshi himself, early Wenbing starts in the Hand-Taiyin; reverse transmission enters the Pericardium, sequential transmission enters Yangming, it can linger in the Sanjiao, and deficiency leads to internal sinking into Shaoyin (actually all six meridians can be involved). Since it is not unchanging, who can teach people to use this as a basis for judging whether it is Shanghan or Wenbing?! Those who say the argument of many vs. few transmissions is an empirical talk, I consider it the most baseless theory. Xie Songmu once refuted this, which can be said to resonate with my thoughts.
V. Early Use of Blood-Invigorating Drugs Is Not Necessarily Wrong
Ye Tianshi strictly divided the use of drugs according to Wei, Ying, Qi, and Blood levels. He said: "After Wei comes Qi, after Ying comes Xue. In Wei, sweating is permissible; only when reaching Qi can one clear heat; even when entering Ying, one can still penetrate heat back to Qi... Entering Xue fears consuming and agitating blood... Otherwise, failing to follow the method of urgency and slowness, one worries about making mistakes upon acting." According to the saying "only when reaching Qi can one clear heat," needless to say, using blood-invigorating drugs for exterior syndromes, even Qi-clearing drugs should not be used abruptly. But in reality, this is not so. The Cinnamon Twig and Peony Root in Guizhi Tang are both Blood-level drugs. Wu Jutong surprisingly used it as the primary formula in the *Wenbing Tiaobian*, which itself illustrates the contradiction between Ye and Wu's theories. Later critics criticized Wu Jutong's use of Guizhi Tang mainly for accusing him of using warmth to treat warmth. I argue that according to Ye Tianshi's theory, he should also be criticized for using blood-invigorating drugs too early, violating the instruction to follow the order of urgency and slowness. However, using blood-invigorating drugs in the Wei level cannot be said to be a fault. Exterior syndromes of Shanghan can use blood-invigorating drugs, and exterior syndromes of Wenbing may well do so too. Ye Tianshi established this strict rule, which itself does not conform to the principle of "Seeing liver disease, knowing it transmits to the spleen, one should first strengthen the spleen." Since seeing Wei-level syndrome and knowing it will step-by-step deepen into Qi, Ying, and Blood levels, why must one wait until Qi to clear heat? Why not follow the principle of treating the spleen when seeing liver disease, preemptively treating Qi and Ying, preventing Qi and Ying syndromes from appearing, and resolving them at the Wei level? "Old Jiang's treatment of Wenbing does not stick to 'after Wei comes Qi, after Ying comes Xue' or 'only when reaching Qi can one clear heat' adaptive therapy, but advocates treating before the syndrome appears."⑤ This treatment proposal is very inspiring, but for those superstitious about Ye Tianshi's theory, it is unimaginable. Zhu Weiju once said: "Medicine as an art excels in rescuing reversals." If Ye Tianshi's theory guides the treatment of warm diseases, its effect in intercepting and reversing is still unsatisfactory. Why must we prostrate ourselves, trembling with fear, unable to cross the boundary! Pushing out the old to bring in the new and continuously improving efficacy is a requirement proposed by the development of the times. We must diligently explore in both theory and practice. Theoretically, one should not adhere to conservatism or cling to one school's theory; clinically, one must start from reality to avoid narrowing the path of medication. In the past, Nie Yuntai treated intestinal typhoid (damp-warmth) by using Rhubarb and blood-invigorating drugs from the beginning, achieving good results. Recent studies show that "using blood-invigorating and stasis-resolving, purgative, and heat-clearing and detoxifying methods to treat 52 cases of epidemic hemorrhagic fever resulted in complete cure, especially the early application of blood-invigorating and stasis-resolving drugs, which increases phagocytic cell capacity and enhances reticuloendothelial system activity, potentially benefiting microcirculation improvement and preventing disseminated intravascular coagulation."⑥ These examples illustrate that using blood-invigorating drugs in the early stage of warm diseases is definitely not "making a mistake upon acting." On the contrary, knowingly that Wei will transmit to Qi but not treating Qi, knowing that Qi will enter Blood but not treating Blood beforehand, waiting for Qi-level syndromes to appear before using Qi-level drugs, and waiting for Blood-level syndromes to appear before using Blood-level drugs—this method of administering drugs trailing behind the lesion—is often called by proponents "treating the syndrome with the corresponding drug," which is syndrome differentiation and treatment. In reality, it does not conform to the principle of "superior doctors treat disease before it arises," and thus does not truly conform to the spirit of syndrome differentiation and treatment.
VI. Removing Qi-Level Drugs Upon Ying-Level Heat Is Not Necessary
The *Wenre Lun* states: "When Ying level receives heat, blood fluid is robbed, heart-mind becomes unsettled, sleeplessness worsens at night, or spots appear faintly; immediately remove Qi-level drugs. If falling in from wind-heat, use Rhinoceros Horn and Bamboo Leaf type drugs; if falling in from damp-heat, use Rhinoceros Horn and Flower Dew type drugs, incorporated into cool-blood and heat-clearing formulas." This text is theoretically self-contradictory and clinically inconsistent with reality, fundamentally insufficient as a guide. Blindly believing in it and interpreting it forcibly may inevitably invite the ridicule of "being confused and unreachable." Looking at the *Wenre Lun*, so-called Wei-level drugs refer to Mint and Burdock Seed types; so-called Qi-level drugs refer to Bamboo Leaf and Flower Dew products; so-called Ying-level drugs refer to Rhinoceros Horn and Scrophularia types; so-called Blood-level drugs refer to Rehmannia Root and Moutan Bark substances (in reality, Ying and Blood level drugs are hard to distinguish, e.g., Ye Tianshi commonly uses Rehmannia Root to clear Ying). While Ye Tianshi warns against immediately removing Qi-level drugs, he simultaneously teaches using Bamboo Leaf and Flower Dew, etc., Qi-level drugs. How obvious is the inability of his theory to justify itself! Furthermore, Ye Tianshi said, "Even when entering Ying, one can still penetrate heat back to Qi." What is meant by "even when entering Ying, one can still penetrate heat back to Qi" is that while using Ying-clearing drugs, one continues to use Qi-level drugs such as Honeysuckle, Forsythia, Scutellaria, and Coptis, hoping that the pathogenic heat entering Ying still penetrates out through the Qi level to resolve. The reason Shenxi Dan (Divine Calamity Pill) used by Ye Tianshi for heat entering Ying and Blood contains so many Qi-level drugs like Honeysuckle, Forsythia, Scutellaria, and Trichosanthes Root is precisely for this reason. The reason Qingying Tang (Clear Ying Decoction) used by Wu Jutong for pathogenic heat entering Ying also uses so many Qi-level drugs like Honeysuckle, Forsythia, Ophiopogon, Bamboo Leaf, and Coptis is for the same reason. If Ying-level heat requires immediately removing Qi-level drugs, how can one explain and understand the drug method of "penetrating heat back to Qi"? From the above, it is evident that the two statements "penetrating heat back to Qi" and "immediately removing Qi-level drugs" are difficult to coexist. Furthermore, looking at medical cases in *Linzheng Zhinan·Wenre Men* (Guide to Clinical Practice·Warm Heat Section), for Wenbing showing Ying-level syndromes, whether latent qi erupts from within or new contraction enters from outside, whether Qi-level pathogenic heat initially transmits to Ying or Qi-Ying heat intensity is burning both, Ye Tianshi never removed Qi-level drugs. For example, Case of Mao, age 60, the pathogenesis is warm pathogen heat entering Ying; treatment uses Rehmannia Root, Ophiopogon, Apricot Kernel, Curcuma Juice, Stir-fried Chinese Fritillary Bulb, and Tangerine Peel. This single case is sufficient to show that the theory of "immediately removing Qi-level drugs" disconnects theory from practice. There are many such cases in the Warm Heat section. For example, Case of Ma involves Shaoyin latent pathogen; treatment still uses Bamboo Leaf and Forsythia, hoping to penetrate blood-borne latent pathogen heat back to Qi. A certain case involves Qi-Blood burning both; treatment uses Anemarrhena, Gypsum, and Bamboo Leaf to clear Qi heat. Case of Old Woman Chen involves heat in Ying; treatment also uses Forsythia, Bamboo Leaf, Polygalae Root, Polygala Root, and Acorus, etc., Qi-level drugs. Conversely, when pathogen initially enters Ying, Ye Tianshi sometimes does not use a single Ying-level drug, but entirely uses Qi-clearing drugs. For example, a certain case involves Spring Warmth, crimson tongue, evidence of Ying heat, but the drugs used are Bamboo Leaf Heart, Anemarrhena, Trichosanthes Root, Talcum, Raw Licorice, and Pear Skin, six flavors, none belonging to Ying-level drugs. The author believes: After Ying level receives heat and blood fluid is robbed, one cannot continue to use only Qi-level drugs; one must consider Ying level and appropriately add Ying-clearing and cool-blood crystals; this is necessary. But immediately removing Qi-level drugs is unnecessary. Ye Tianshi treats this way but says that way. The *Wenre Lun*, within a short space, is so often contradictory that later generations suspect that when Gu Jingping recorded and wrote *Wen Zheng Lun Zhi* (Treatise on Warm Syndrome Differentiation), it did not fully conform to Ye Tianshi's original intent. If later generations insist that every sentence of the *Wenre Lun* represents Ye Tianshi's true intent, then Ye Tianshi cannot escape blame.
VII. Damp-Warmth Has No Mechanism to Transform into Malaria
In the process of treating Wenbing and damp diseases, predecessors sometimes encountered original diseases that were lingering and tricky. Later, occasionally due to the patient contracting malaria again, as the malaria was cured, the original disease also healed. Thus, it was mistakenly believed that the original disease transformed into malaria. Furthermore, since malaria differentiation includes dampness and warmth, they became convinced that damp-warmth disease could transform into malaria. The *Wenre Lun* states: "...Because it is still in the Qi level, one can still hope for its portal of battle sweat and mechanism of transforming into malaria." And *Linzheng Zhinan* states: "Warm pathogen combined with rain and dampness, externally contending becomes malaria." (Case Wu in Malaria Section) "This damp-warmth external qi becomes malaria" (Case Cao in the same book). By reading these texts together, we can accurately understand Ye Tianshi's viewpoint. Zhang Xugu believed that for damp-warmth disease, as long as one expands its Qi mechanism, using "Apricot, Magnolia, Wendan Decoction types, pungent-pungent sweet-bitter to facilitate ascending-descending and turn Qi mechanism, opening the portal of battle sweat, becoming the head of transforming into malaria." Wang Mengying believed that the phrase "mechanism of transforming into malaria" originally refers to Qi mechanism being unblocked, the disease then transforms into malaria, thus killing the pathogen. Obviously, such interpretations generated from the text are passing on errors. Damp-warmth is damp-warmth, malaria is malaria; there is no possibility of mutual transformation between these two diseases. People with modern medical knowledge understand the absurdity of this predecessor's recognition, so now everyone adopts the explanation of "transforming into a malaria-like state." This clever change in wording shows that later generations' understanding is more correct than predecessors', reflecting annotators' worship of Ye Tianshi. But this later generation's knowledge cannot explain the true intent of Ye Tianshi's original text. Ye Tianshi said damp-warmth can transform into malaria; Zhang and Wang said damp-warmth would transform into malaria. This is a wrong understanding of disease by predecessors. Without pointing this out realistically and clearly, beginners will inevitably still be influenced by this theory. Therefore, the theory of damp-warmth transforming into malaria is indeed a flaw in the *Wenre Lun*.
VIII. Tongue Spikes Are Not All Due to Extreme Upper Jiao Heat