素问曰。病为本。工为标。标本不得。邪气不服。
又曰。标本已得。邪气乃服。夫所谓标本者。一体本末
之事。今病与工。自非一体。何其言标本也。盖谓某病为本。则以治某病者为标。因其本而治其标。则工与病。
自成一家矣。且如病伤寒者。以伤寒为本。则亦以能治伤寒之工为标。此所谓标本已得。邪气乃服也。如以伤
寒为本。而以能治痹疝之工为标。则标本不相得。邪气何缘可服哉。素问论此。乃以得不得为言。圣哲之意可
见。况病有轻重。工有高下。重病须高工。亦谓其标本相得也。扁鹊曰。人之所患患疾多。医之所患患道少。
道少疾多。此标本之所难相得也。凡病固皆难。惟伤寒为特甚。盖人之疾痛。或在皮肤。或肌肉。或骨髓。或
五脏六腑。着则久而不去。未有入经与经气流通者。惟伤寒之毒。能入大经。与经气相搏。经气不能胜。反藉
经隧恣意攻人。人为之拱手待毙。昔之所谓流注血气。生养人命之经。今化为寒温热毒。毒人生命之经矣。
是岂他疾之比哉。故自古以为难治之疾。方其疾作之始。日传一经。初传之际。证或难辨。用药尚疑。当是之
时。其工在明。及传证之始。急于用药。犹豫则差。其工在断。一经既过。又将别传。新故相乱。其工在审。
为之工者。自非六日之传。昭然豫判于胸中。亦未易酬对。三阴三阳之变。彼如疾风骏马。过不暂停。而欲逐
其后而攻之。谬矣。况有异气间袭。变动随出。或表或里。超然若神。不可以常拘者。将何应之。故仲景曰。
阴阳虚实之交错。其候至微。发汗吐下之相反。其祸至速。信斯言也。自非心精学博。机运无穷。未有不触途
面墙。倒行逆施者。此所谓贵于标本相得。而后邪气乃服也。惟其最为难治。故自张长沙以来。特为注意。
辨析毫厘。动辄十数万言以训后世。今医方论说。复无详于伤寒者。昔云难治之病。今反为晓然易见之疾。
患在常人苟且。不诵其书耳。则书之为后人利。岂不溥哉。是以陶隐居称仲景之书为众方之祖。孙真人叹其特
有神功。良有以也。雍之仲兄。字子言。尝通守夷陵秭归二郡。幼以多疾喜方。遍访名医。时尚及见常器之、康醇
道辈。
遂悟医师氏之学既久。深得于仲景之论。每叹此学大难穷尽。今则其道将绝。时为雍言之。雍初得闻仲景之书。未
甚领
略。渐磨日久。及老后笃好之。叹已晚矣。昔仲景感往昔之沦丧。伤横夭之莫救。乃撰伤寒杂病论。雍之用心。
亦复为此。虽学识疏略。无高人之见。而一言一事。上必有所本。中必得于心。而后敢笔之于书。尽去世俗妄
论欺惑之术。常如天地父母临其上。庶几后世复有扬子云。始知雍言之不谬也。今所论次。自岐黄以及近代诸
书。凡论辨问答证治。合一千五百余条。总五万言。分七十余门。集成论说二十卷。方药五卷。雍闻医家有好
事。或三十年而着论。或二十载而成书。其用心精专。故足以垂世。如雍行年八十。日暮途远。志在速成。
安能久于斯道。是以不逾年而略举大纲。亦由前人之述已备。继踵有作。不过书札之力而已。未能免疏略 牾
也。后之君子。或怜其衰晚昏谬。疏其失而正之。以成其美。此诚有望焉。嗟乎。予生不辰。上不得见张长沙
孙真人。北面抠衣而请。下不得进于庞朱二氏之前。独抱遗书。呻吟于深山穷谷之间。啜菽饮水而不厌焉者。
乐在其中矣。昔孔子多能鄙事。子夏虽小道必观。圣贤尚且不废。况后人乎。幸不以猥吝见黜也。
淳熙八年岁在辛丑暮春之月河南郭雍谨叙
近世诸家伤寒书。如高文庄伤寒类要。未得本。庞朱二氏。传世已久。常器之补治论。虽略有传。而不
得善本。今有文阙者补之。讹舛者正之。疑不敢用者去之。庶不累其名。后来者惟王仲弓监丞一书。颇有发明。
遇前人阙则取之。自此而下。非所当录。虽有传于世者。未足为后世不刊之说也。
《素问》说:疾病是根本,医生是标。如果标本不相契合,邪气就无法制服。
又说:如果标本已经契合,邪气就能被制服。所谓“标本”,本是一体之始终的关系。如今病人和医生并非同一实体,为何称它们为标本呢?大概是指某种疾病为本,那么治疗这种疾病的医生就是标。顺着疾病这个根本去治疗其标(即运用医术),那么医生与疾病就自成一家了。
况且比如患伤寒病的人,以伤寒为本,那么能治疗伤寒的医生就是标。这就是所谓的“标本已得,邪气乃服”。如果以伤寒为本,却用擅长治疗痹疝病的医生作为标,那么标本就不相契合,邪气又怎么能被制服呢?《素问》讨论这一点,是以是否“得”或“不得”来论述的,圣哲的心意由此可见。
何况疾病有轻重之分,医生有高下之别。重病需要高明的医生,也是指他们的标本相契合。扁鹊说:“人所担忧的是疾病繁多,医生所担忧的是医道浅薄。”医道浅薄而疾病繁多,这是标本难以相契合的原因。
大凡疾病都难治,只有伤寒特别严重。人的病痛,有的在皮肤,有的在肌肉,有的在骨髓,有的在五脏六腑。病邪附着则久久不去,没有进入经脉并与经气流通的。只有伤寒的毒邪,能进入大经脉,与经气相互搏结。经气不能战胜它,反而借助经络肆意攻击人体,让人只能拱手等待死亡。过去所谓的流注血气、滋养生命的经脉,现在变成了寒热温毒、危害人生命的途径了。这难道是其他疾病能相比的吗?
所以自古以来认为它是难治的疾病。当疾病发作之初,每天传变一经。在初传之际,证候或许难以辨别,用药尚存疑虑,这时医生的关键在于明察;等到传变证候开始显现时,急于用药,犹豫就会出错,这时医生的关键在于决断;一经传变既过,又将传变至他经,新旧症状混杂,这时医生的关键在于审慎。
作为医生,如果不是对六日传变的规律了然于胸并预先判断,也很容易应对失当。三阴三阳的变化,快如疾风骏马,经过不停留,想要追逐其后而攻伐它,就错了。何况有异气间杂侵袭,变化随之产生,或在表或在里,超然若神,不可以常规拘束的,将如何应对呢?
所以张仲景说:“阴阳虚实的交错,其征象极其细微;发汗、吐下等治法的相反,其祸害极其迅速。”相信这句话吧,如果不是心思精微、学识渊博、机运无穷的人,没有不触途面墙、倒行逆施的。这就是所说的贵在标本相契合,然后邪气才能被制服。
正因为伤寒最难治疗,所以自张仲景以来,特别注重于此。辨析毫厘之差,动辄数万言以教导后世。现在的医方论说中,再也没有比伤寒更详尽的了。过去认为是难治的病,现在反而成为清晰易见的疾病。问题在于普通人苟且偷懒,不诵读这些书籍罢了。那么书籍为后人带来的利益,难道不是非常广博吗?
因此陶弘景称赞仲景的书是众方的始祖,孙思邈感叹其具有神奇的功效,确实是有原因的。我的二哥字子言,曾经代理夷陵、秭归两郡太守。他自幼多病,喜欢研究药方,遍访名医。当时他还能见到常器之、康醇道等人。于是领悟到医师之学既然长久流传,深得仲景的论述精髓。常常感叹这门学问太难穷尽,如今其道将要断绝,时常对我说起。
我起初得到仲景的书,并未深刻领会。逐渐磨砺日久,到了老年后更加笃爱它,感叹自己太晚了。昔日仲景感慨往昔经典的沦丧,哀伤横死夭折者无人救助,于是撰写《伤寒杂病论》。我的用心,也是为了这个目的。虽然学识疏略,没有高人的见解,但一言一事,上必有所依据,中必心得于心,然后才敢笔录成书。摒弃世俗荒谬论调欺骗迷惑的手段,常常如同天地父母在头顶审视一样,希望后世再出现像扬雄那样的人,才知道我的话没有谬误。
现在所论述编排的内容,从岐伯、黄帝直到近代诸书,凡是论辩问答、证治内容,合一千五百余条,总计五万言,分七十余门,集成论说二十卷,方药五卷。我听说医家中有喜好著述的,有的三十年写论,有的二十年成书。他们用心精专,所以足以流传于世。像我今年八十岁,日暮途远,志向在于速成,怎能长久沉浸在这条道路上?因此不到一年就粗略举出大纲,也是因为前人的论述已经完备,继踵之作,不过是书信之力而已,未能避免疏漏和矛盾。后来的君子,或许怜悯我衰老昏谬,指出我的失误并加以纠正,以成就其完美,这确实是有所期望的。
唉!我生不逢时,上不能见到张仲景、孙真人,北面整衣请教;下不能进见庞安时、朱肱二位大家。独自抱着遗书,呻吟于深山穷谷之间,喝着豆汁清水而不厌倦,乐趣就在这其中了。昔日孔子多才多艺,精通各种鄙俗技艺,子夏说即使是小道也必须观察。圣贤尚且不废弃,何况后人呢?希望不要因我的粗陋吝啬而被排斥。
淳熙八年,岁次辛丑,暮春三月,河南郭雍恭敬地叙述。
近世各家关于伤寒的书籍,如高文庄的《伤寒类要》,我没有得到原本。庞安时、朱肱二氏的书传世已久。常器之的《补治论》,虽然略有流传,但没有得到好的版本。现在有文字缺失的就补充它,错误错乱的就校正它,有疑问不敢用的就去除它,希望不连累他们的名声。后来者只有王仲弓监丞的一本书,颇有发明创造。遇到前人缺失的地方就采纳它,自此以下,不属于应当收录的范围。虽然有流传在世的,也不足以成为后世不可更改的定论。
The *Suwen* (Basic Questions) states: The disease is the root (*ben*), and the physician is the branch (*biao*). If the root and branch do not correspond, the pathogenic factor cannot be subdued.
It further states: If the root and branch have corresponded, then the pathogenic factor can be subdued. What is meant by "root" and "branch" is a matter of the beginning and end of a single entity. Today, the patient and the physician are not one entity; why speak of them as root and branch? It is said that a specific disease constitutes the root, and thus the physician who treats that specific disease constitutes the branch. By following the root to treat the branch, the physician and the disease become integrated into one system.
For instance, in a case of *Shanghan* (Cold Damage), *Shanghan* is the root, and the physician capable of treating *Shanghan* is the branch. This is what is meant by "the root and branch have corresponded, and the pathogenic factor is subdued." If *Shanghan* is taken as the root, but a physician skilled in treating *Bishan* (Bi syndrome and hernia) is chosen as the branch, then the root and branch do not correspond; how could the pathogenic factor possibly be subdued? The *Suwen* discusses this in terms of correspondence or non-correspondence, revealing the intent of the sages.
Moreover, diseases vary in severity, and physicians vary in skill. Severe diseases require highly skilled physicians, which refers to the correspondence of root and branch. Bian Que said: "What people worry about is the multiplicity of diseases; what physicians worry about is the paucity of medical principles." When principles are few and diseases many, it is difficult for the root and branch to correspond.
All diseases are indeed difficult, but *Shanghan* is particularly severe. Human ailments may reside in the skin, muscles, bone marrow, or the five zang and six fu organs. Once pathogens attach, they linger and do not depart; normally, they do not enter the meridians and circulate with the meridian qi. Only the toxin of *Shanghan* can enter the major meridians and contend with the meridian qi. If the meridian qi cannot overcome it, it instead utilizes the meridians to attack the body recklessly, leaving the person helpless and awaiting death. The meridians once known for circulating blood and qi and nourishing life have now become pathways for cold, heat, and warm toxins that endanger life. How can this be compared to other diseases?
Therefore, since ancient times, it has been considered a difficult disease to treat. At the onset of the illness, the pathogen transmits through one meridian each day. During the initial transmission, symptoms may be hard to distinguish, and medication choices remain uncertain; at this time, the physician's key lies in clarity (*ming*). When the transmitted symptoms begin to manifest, urgency in medication is required; hesitation leads to error, so the physician's key lies in decisiveness (*duan*). After one meridian stage passes, transmission to another begins, mixing new and old symptoms; here, the physician's key lies in careful examination (*shen*).
A physician must have a clear, pre-judged understanding of the six-day transmission cycle; otherwise, responses will likely be inadequate. The changes of the Three Yin and Three Yang meridians are swift like a gale or a galloping horse, passing without pause. To chase after them and attack is erroneous. Furthermore, when heterogeneous pathogens invade intermittently, variations emerge spontaneously, sometimes in the exterior, sometimes in the interior, transcending normal constraints like spirits. How should one respond?
Thus, Zhang Zhongjing stated: "The interweaving of Yin-Yang deficiency and excess presents subtle signs; the opposition of sweating, vomiting, and purging methods brings rapid disaster." Believing this statement, unless one possesses profound insight, extensive learning, and infinite adaptability, one will inevitably hit a wall and act counterproductively. This emphasizes the importance of the root and branch corresponding, so that the pathogenic factor may be subdued.
Because it is the most difficult to treat, attention has been specially focused on it since Zhang Changsha (Zhang Zhongjing). Analyzing minute details, writing tens of thousands of words to instruct future generations. Among current medical theories and formulas, none are more detailed regarding *Shanghan*. A disease once considered difficult to treat is now clearly visible and easy to understand. The problem lies in ordinary people being negligent and failing to study these books. Thus, the benefit of these books to posterity is indeed vast.
Therefore, Tao Hongjing praised Zhang Zhongjing's book as the ancestor of all formulas, and Sun Simiao sighed at its miraculous efficacy, both having valid reasons. My second brother, courtesy name Ziyan, served as acting governor of Yiling and Zigui commanderies. Suffering from frequent illnesses since childhood, he favored medical prescriptions and visited famous physicians extensively. He was able to meet figures such as Chang Qizhi and Kang Chundao. Consequently, he realized that the art of medicine, having been passed down for a long time, deeply embodies Zhang Zhongjing's theories. He often lamented that this learning is extremely difficult to exhaust and that its lineage is nearing extinction, frequently speaking of this to me.
I initially obtained Zhang Zhongjing's book but did not fully grasp it. Through gradual study over time, I came to love it deeply in my old age, sighing that I had started too late. Formerly, Zhang Zhongjing lamented the loss of past classics and mourned those who died prematurely without rescue, leading him to compile the *Shanghan Zabing Lun* (Treatise on Cold Damage and Miscellaneous Diseases). My intention is the same. Although my knowledge is sparse and lacking in superior insights, every word and deed must have an upper source and inner conviction before I dare record it in writing. I discard worldly absurdities and deceptive techniques, always feeling as if Heaven, Earth, and parents are watching from above. I hope that someone like Yang Xiong will appear in later generations to confirm that my words are not erroneous.
The discussions compiled here range from Qibo and Huangdi to recent works. All debates, Q&A, symptom analysis, and treatments total over 1,500 entries, amounting to 50,000 characters, divided into over 70 categories, forming 20 volumes of theoretical discourse and 5 volumes of formulas and herbs. I have heard that medical scholars who enjoy writing may take thirty years for essays or twenty years for books. Their focused effort allows their work to endure. I am now eighty years old, with the sun setting and the road far; my ambition is quick completion. How can I linger long in this path? Therefore, within a year, I have outlined the main points. Since predecessors' accounts are already complete, subsequent works rely merely on letter-writing efforts and cannot avoid omissions and contradictions. Future gentlemen may pity my senile confusion, correct my errors, and perfect this work, which is indeed hoped for.
Alas! I was born in an ill-fated time. I cannot see Zhang Changsha or Sun Zhenren to bow and ask for instruction; nor can I approach Pang Anshi and Zhu Gong. Alone holding lost texts, groaning in deep mountains and remote valleys, drinking bean soup and water without weariness, finding joy therein. Confucius mastered many humble skills; Zixia said even minor arts must be observed. Even sages did not abandon them, let alone later generations. I hope I am not rejected for my clumsiness and stinginess.
In the eighth year of Chunxi, Xin Chou year, late spring month, Guo Yong of Henan respectfully records this.
Recent scholarly works on *Shanghan*, such as Gao Wenzhuang's *Shanghan Leyao*, I have not obtained the original. The works of Pang Anshi and Zhu Gong have been transmitted for a long time. Chang Qizhi's *Bu Zhi Lun* has slight circulation but no good edition. Where text is missing, I supplement it; where errors exist, I correct them; where doubts persist, I remove them, hoping not to tarnish their reputations. Among later authors, only Wang Zhonggong's monograph shows significant innovation. Where predecessors were deficient, I adopt his views. Below this point, nothing else is suitable for recording. Even if transmitted, they are insufficient to serve as unchangeable doctrines for posterity.