医,小道也,精义也,重任也,贱工也。古者大人之学,将以治天下国家,使无一夫不
被其
之近,不能兼及。况乎不可治者,又非使能起死者而使之生,其道不已小乎?虽然,古圣人
之治病也,通于天地之故,究乎性命之源,经络、脏腑、气血、骨脉,洞然如见,然后察其
受病之由,用药以驱除而调剂之。其中自有玄机妙悟,不可得而言喻者,盖与造化相维,其
义不亦精乎?道小,则有志之士有所不屑为,义精,则无识之徒有所不能窥也。人之所系,
莫大乎生死。王公大人,圣遇豪杰,可以旋转乾坤,而不能保无疾病之患。一有疾病,不得
不听之医者,而生杀唯命矣。夫一人系天下之重,而天下所系之人,其命又悬于医者。下而
一国一家所系之人更无论矣,其任不亦重乎?而独是其人者,又非有爵禄道德之尊,父兄师
保之重。既非世之所隆,而其人之自视,亦不过为衣服口食之计。虽以一介之微,呼之而立
,至其业不甚贱乎?任重,则托之者必得伟人;工贱,则业之者必无奇士。所以势出于相违
,而道因之易坠也。余少时颇有志于穷经,而肉数人疾病连年,死亡略尽。于是博览方书,
寝食俱废。如是数年,虽无生死骨肉之方,实有寻本溯源之学。九折臂而成医,至今尤信。
而窃概唐宋以来,无儒者为之振兴,视为下业,逡巡失传,至理已失,良法并亡。 焉伤怀
,恐自今以往不复有生人之术。不揣庸妄,用敷厥言,倘有所补所全者,或不仅一人一世已
乎?
乾隆丁丑秋七月洞溪徐大椿书于吴山之半松书屋
Medicine is a seemingly minor art, yet it possesses profound principles and heavy responsibilities, while being regarded as a lowly craft. In ancient times, the learning of great men aimed to govern the world and the state, ensuring that not a single person was left without receiving its benefits; (due to the complexity of affairs) they could not attend to every minute detail. Moreover, regarding diseases that are incurable, medicine cannot bring the dead back to life; does this not make the art appear insignificant? Nevertheless, when the sages of old treated diseases, they understood the laws of heaven and earth, investigated the source of life and nature, and clearly perceived the meridians (Jingluo), zang-fu organs, qi and blood, bones, and vessels. Then, they observed the cause of the disease and used herbs to expel pathogens and regulate the body. Within this process lies profound mystery and intuitive insight, which cannot be fully expressed in words; it seems to be intertwined with creation itself, making its principles indeed extremely refined. If the Dao is considered minor, then those with ambition will disdain to practice it; if the principles are too profound, then the ignorant will be unable to penetrate them. Nothing is more significant to humans than life and death. Princes, ministers, sage rulers, and heroes can turn the tide of history, but they cannot guarantee immunity from illness. Once ill, they must submit to the physician, with life and death at his disposal. The fate of an individual carries the weight of the world, and the lives of those upon whom the world relies hang in the balance of the physician's hands. This applies even more so to those relied upon by a nation or a family; thus, is not the responsibility immense? Yet, the physician himself lacks the noble status conferred by rank and salary, nor does he hold the authority of fathers, brothers, teachers, or guardians. Since he is not esteemed by society, and views his own role merely as a means to secure clothing and food, although humble in status and ready to respond to any call, is not this profession considered lowly? Because the responsibility is heavy, those who entrust their lives must find a great man; because the profession is lowly, those who engage in it are rarely extraordinary talents. Thus, the circumstances contradict each other, and the Dao easily falls into decline. In my youth, I had ambitions to thoroughly study the Classics, but relatives and friends suffered from illnesses for years, and many died. Consequently, I extensively studied medical texts, neglecting sleep and food. After several years, although I possessed no miraculous prescriptions to reverse death, I did acquire the learning of tracing origins and seeking roots. "Nine broken arms make a physician," a saying I still firmly believe. However, I secretly lament that since the Tang and Song dynasties, no Confucian scholars have revitalized this field, viewing it as a subordinate occupation, leading to hesitation and loss of transmission. The profound truths have been lost, and good methods perished together. I am deeply grieved, fearing that henceforth there will be no techniques to save lives. Presuming my mediocrity and presumption, I present these words. If they offer any benefit or preservation, perhaps they will extend beyond just one person or one generation?
Written by Xu Dachun of Dongxi in the Half-Pine Study on Wu Mountain, in the seventh month of autumn, Ding Chou year of Qianlong.